Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[As an international observer, Michael Ignatieff concluded that one of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s (TRC) major accomplishments was to destroy any preconception that apartheid fell because it was unsustainable, but “not really all that bad.”1 The TRC, says Ignatieff, showed a very different picture of apartheid: “Not a few bad apples, not a few bad cops like Gideon Nieuwoudt, but a system, a culture, a way of life that was organized around contempt and violence of human beings” (21). He admits that truth commissions in general do not work miracles, but that they at least “reduce the number of lies in circulation” (quoted in Nolan 146). There are those, says Ignatieff, who would argue the process was a waste of time, or worse, an “exercise in kitsch, in sentimentality, in theatre, in hollow pretense” (Ignatieff 20). Still, he claims that all who attended the hearings, “even the harshest critics … would concede that something happened” (20, my emphasis). Ignatieff does not venture to say what this something is and implies that it resists articulation.]
Published: Oct 10, 2015
Keywords: Restorative Justice; Political Organization; African National Congress; Truth Commission; Armed Robbery
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.