Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[School psychologists should be committed to enhancing the academic success and behavioral competence of all students (Ysseldyke et al., 2006). Comprehensive school-wide prevention and intervention programs designed to promote these conditions, however, are frequently not successful despite the concerted efforts of school personnel. Unfortunately, schools have historically been and largely continue to be institutions in which highly-touted interventions and prevention programs are frequently adopted despite little or no evidence of their effectiveness (Merrell, Ervin, & Gimpel, 2006). Short-term fads and unproven trends often develop and flourish, only to be eventually replaced by other well-intentioned but typically fleeting educational initiatives (Sarason, 1996). Not only are many of these faddish trends and programs (colloquially known as “bandwagons”) implemented with little or no research support, in many cases they also are ineffectively evaluated or not evaluated at all (Merrell et al., 2006).]
Published: Oct 23, 2010
Keywords: School Psychologist; School Personnel; Social Validity; Disruptive Behavior Problem; Suicide Prevention Program
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.