Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2006)
A prospective randomized blinded comparison of sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for safe bowel cleansingAliment Pharmacol Ther, 23
(2003)
Sodium phosphate is superior to polyethylene glycol in bowel cleansing and shortens the time it takes to visualize colon mucosaScand J Gastroenterol, 38
(2009)
Bowel preparation before colonoscopy in the era of mass screening for colo-rectal cancer: a practical approachDig Liver Dis, 41
(2003)
A randomized single-blind trial of whole versus split-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparationGastrointest Endosc, 58
(2006)
Colonoscopic screening for colorectal cancer improves quality of life measures: a population-based screening studyHealth Qual Life Outcomes, 4
(2008)
Bowel preparation for colonoscopy with sodium phosphate solution versus polyethylene glycol-based lavage: a multicenter trialDiagn Ther Endosc, 2008
(2003)
A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy (HSG-01*)Endoscopy, 35
(2006)
Which is the optimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy—a meta-analysisColorectal Dis, 8
(2007)
Surveillance colonoscopy practice in Lynch syndrome in the Netherlands: a nationwide surveyWorld J Gastroenterol, 13
(2009)
A multicentre, observational study of sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate as a precolonoscopy bowel preparationCan J Gastroenterol, 23
(2011)
Polyethylene glycol versus sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: a treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsBMC Gastroenterol, 11
(2011)
Bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: prospective randomized assessment of efficacy and of induced mucosal abnormality with three preparation agentsEndoscopy, 43
(2006)
Commonly used preparations for colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability, and safety–a Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position paperCan J Gastroenterol, 20
(2005)
Polyethylene glycol versus sodium phosphate in bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: a randomized trialEndoscopy, 37
(2005)
Prospective randomized comparison of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol lavage for colonoscopy preparationWorld J Gastroenterol, 11
(1999)
A prospective randomised study comparing polyethylene glycol and sodium phosphate bowel cleansing solutions for colonoscopyUlster Med J, 68
(2010)
Body mass index increases risk of colorectal adenomas in men with Lynch syndrome: the GEOLynch cohort studyJ Clin Oncol, 28
(2005)
A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparationGastrointest Endosc, 62
(1984)
Familial colon carcinomaNed Tijdschr Geneeskd, 128
(2012)
Meta-analysis: the relative efficacy of oral bowel preparations for colonoscopy 1985–2010Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 35
(2006)
The frequency of a positive family history for colorectal cancer: a population-based study in the NetherlandsNeth J Med, 64
Lynch gene carriers undergo regular surveillance colonoscopies. Polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution (PEG) is routinely prescribed for bowel cleansing, but often poorly tolerated by patients. Sodium phosphate (NaP) may be an alternative. Prospective and random comparison of bowel preparation with PEG and NaP on colon cleansing and patients’ acceptance. Patients, who previously underwent a colonoscopy, were invited to participate and randomly assigned to either PEG or NaP. They were asked to fill in a questionnaire about preparation tolerability and future preferences. The endoscopist filled out a report about the quality of colon cleansing. 125 Patients were included in the study. Nine (7%) were excluded because of missing data. The remaining 116 patients (53 PEG and 63 NaP) were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. Before colonoscopy 20 (38%) patients using PEG experienced the preparation almost intolerable, in contrast to 7(11%) of those using NaP (P = 0.001). Eleven patients in the PEG group and 48 in the NaP group would prefer NaP in the future. The colonoscopy was poorly tolerated in 17% of the individuals in both groups (P = 0.963). The endoscopist observed a more than 75% clean colon in 83% of patients on PEG and in 71% of patients on NaP (P = 0.076), however the coecum (P = 0.025) and ascending colon was cleaner after PEG. Lynch patients tolerated NaP better and preferred this formula for future bowel preparation. Colon cleansing was suboptimal with both treatments with a tendency towards a cleaner proximal colon with PEG.
Familial Cancer – Springer Journals
Published: Feb 23, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.