Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Science-Based Critique of Epistemological Naturalism in Quine’s TraditionConclusion

A Science-Based Critique of Epistemological Naturalism in Quine’s Tradition: Conclusion [This chapter summarizes the insights of the previous chapters. It concludes that naturalists face a dilemma when trying to say what scientific justification amounts to, which in turn suggests that this is a non-empirical question. Furthermore, it assesses the prospects of naturalized epistemology based on this suggestion, and by drawing on the results of part one of the book.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

A Science-Based Critique of Epistemological Naturalism in Quine’s TraditionConclusion

Springer Journals — Jul 28, 2019

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-science-based-critique-of-epistemological-naturalism-in-quine-s-LanimzhCvA
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019
ISBN
978-3-030-24523-8
Pages
273 –282
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-24524-5_10
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[This chapter summarizes the insights of the previous chapters. It concludes that naturalists face a dilemma when trying to say what scientific justification amounts to, which in turn suggests that this is a non-empirical question. Furthermore, it assesses the prospects of naturalized epistemology based on this suggestion, and by drawing on the results of part one of the book.]

Published: Jul 28, 2019

Keywords: Naturalism; Scientific justification; Naturalized epistemology; Metaphilosophy; Epistemology

There are no references for this article.