Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[While one may inherit one’s “race”, language is not necessarily inherited and nowhere is this more evident than migrant cities where the second and third generations begin to use languages that are vastly different from their parents and grandparents. This chapter proposes the solidarity-plurality model as a way of understanding early identities. It uses parameters such as dress, food, religious rites and literary endeavours as a means to examine the processes of acculturation and assimilation. The postulation of a cline or continuum rather than a more static classificatory listing is useful for the study of intergenerational identities, for it suggests a gradual/fluid movement rather than a neat transition from one identity stage to the other.]
Published: Oct 21, 2015
Keywords: Chinese Origin; Hybrid Identity; Malay Language; Religious Rite; Chinese Merchant
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.