Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[After the explanations and analyses in the previous seven chapters, let us return to the question raised in Chap. 1: “In spite of the continuous increase of depression patients, why is the lifetime prevalence of depression in China so low by international comparison?” This book has tried to answer this question within the context of neoliberal globalization and proposed a sociological analytical framework with a two-layered and two-faceted matrix—the “global/international level” and the “domestic/national level”, and the “social structure” perspective and the “social construction” perspective based on a detailed comparative analysis of five research paradigms in medical sociology.]
Published: Sep 11, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.