Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Stranger in His Own Field? Bellah’s Radical Critique of Science

A Stranger in His Own Field? Bellah’s Radical Critique of Science Over the sixty years of his career, Robert Bellah has occupied an enigmatic position in the field of American sociology. Despite his triumphant academic career and his standing as a prominent advocate of sociology in the public sphere, he felt increasingly dissatisfied with the direction of sociology and believed he was underrecognized and misinterpreted by many of his peers. Drawing on Matteo Bortolini’s A Joyfully Serious Man, this article reviews various biographical circumstances that may account for Bellah’s ambiguous status as a sociologist. It then argues that the most significant source of tension with the sociological profession was Bellah’s aversion to science as manifested in many of his writings, where he engaged in a relentless critique of positivism and scientism. This negative side of Bellah’s epistemology, i.e. what he defined as bad or dangerous knowledge, is often overlooked both by Bortolini in his book and by commentators who try to derive a usable epistemology from Bellah’s oeuvre. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The American Sociologist Springer Journals

A Stranger in His Own Field? Bellah’s Radical Critique of Science

Brandmayr, Federico
The American Sociologist , Volume OnlineFirst – May 3, 2023
Download PDF
12 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-stranger-in-his-own-field-bellah-s-radical-critique-of-science-2M41SHg66c

References (18)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
ISSN
0003-1232
eISSN
1936-4784
DOI
10.1007/s12108-023-09573-4
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Over the sixty years of his career, Robert Bellah has occupied an enigmatic position in the field of American sociology. Despite his triumphant academic career and his standing as a prominent advocate of sociology in the public sphere, he felt increasingly dissatisfied with the direction of sociology and believed he was underrecognized and misinterpreted by many of his peers. Drawing on Matteo Bortolini’s A Joyfully Serious Man, this article reviews various biographical circumstances that may account for Bellah’s ambiguous status as a sociologist. It then argues that the most significant source of tension with the sociological profession was Bellah’s aversion to science as manifested in many of his writings, where he engaged in a relentless critique of positivism and scientism. This negative side of Bellah’s epistemology, i.e. what he defined as bad or dangerous knowledge, is often overlooked both by Bortolini in his book and by commentators who try to derive a usable epistemology from Bellah’s oeuvre.

Journal

The American Sociologist – Springer Journals

Published: May 3, 2023

Keywords: Bellah; Sociology; Science; Epistemology; Positivism; Scientism

There are no references for this article.