Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P.M. Blaikie, S.Z. Sadeque (2000)
Policy on High Places, Environment and Development in Himalayan Region
Martin Lewis, K. Brown, D. Pearce (1996)
The Causes of Tropical Deforestation: The Economic and Statistical Analysis of Factors Giving Rise to the Loss of the Tropical ForestsGeographical Review, 86
P.C. Tiwari (2000)
Land Use Changes in Himalayas and their Impact on the Plains Ecosystem: Need for Sustainable Land UseLand Use Ploicy, 17
J.C. Burgess (1992)
Economic Analysis of Causes of Tropical Deforestation
(1981)
Hydrometreolaogy and Sediment Data for Phewa Watershed: 1979 Data
D.R. Stoddart (1969)
Water, Earth and Man
M. Moench, J. Bandyopadhyay (1986)
PEOPLE-FOREST INTERACTION: A NEGLECTED PARAMETER .IN HIMALAYAN FOREST MANAGEMENTMountain Research and Development, 6
Michael Rock (1996)
The stork, the plow, rural social structure and tropical deforestation in poor countries?Ecological economics : the journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics, 18 2
P.L. Gautam, V. Singh (2003)
Operationalizing Sustainable Agriculture in the Mountains
(1994)
Population and deforestation
H.G. Champion, S.K. Seth (1968)
Forest Types of India
S. Ravindranath, S. Premnath (1997)
Biomass studies : field methods for monitoring biomass
J.C. Allen, D.F. Barnes (1985)
The Causes of Degradation in Developing CountriesAnnu Assoc Am Geogr, 75
A. Carter, D. Gilmour (1989)
INCREASE IN TREE COVER ON PRIVATE FARM LAND IN CENTRAL NEPALMountain Research and Development, 9
S.D. Sharma, A.K. Raina, M. Gera, P. Soni, M.K. Gupta (2005)
Annual Report of the European Union Project on Himalayan Degradation
H. Dregne (1990)
Erosion and soil productivity in AfricaJournal of Soil and Water Conservation, 45
D. Gilmour (1988)
Not seeing the trees for the forest: a re-appraisal of the deforestation crisis in two hill districts of NepalMountain Research and Development, 8
R.J. Sharma, A. Kumar (2003)
Livestock Care and Management Options in Watershed Management. Watershed Management in Himalaya: Concept and Strategy
E.F.K. Shitindi (1996)
On the Causes of Deforestation in Tanzania: An Economic Study [M.Phil. Economics Dissertation]
J.S. Singh, S.P. Singh (1992)
Forests of Himalaya
K. Sen, K. Rao, K. Saxena (1997)
Soil erosion due to settled upland farming in the Himalaya: a case study in Pranmati watershedInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 4
P. Tiwari (2000)
Land-use changes in Himalaya and their impact on the plains ecosystem: need for sustainable land useLand Use Policy, 17
M. Thomson, M. Wartburton (1985)
Decision Making under Contradicting Certainties: How to Save the Himalayas When You Can?t Find Out What?s Wrong With ThemJournal of Applied Systems Analysis, 12
K.R. Bontalakoti, K. Joshi, A.K. Mishra, B.P. Kothyari, R.K. Pande (2000)
The People and Resource Dynamics Project: First Three Years (1996?1999)
S. Cain (1938)
The Species-Area CurveAmerican Midland Naturalist, 19
P. Sankhayan, N. Gurung, B. Sitaula, O. Hofstad (2003)
Bio-economic modeling of land use and forest degradation at watershed level in NepalAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 94
(1998)
People and Resource Dynamics: Jhiko Khola watershedICIMOD Newsletter, 32
B. Larson (1994)
Changing the economics of environmental degradation in Madagascar: Lessons from the national environmental action plan processWorld Development, 22
B.P. Sah (1996)
Watershed Degradation and its Socio-economic Impacts using RS and GIS: A Case Study of Trijuga Watershed, Nepal [Dissertation (M.Sc.) NR 96-20.]
T. Mahat, D. Griffin, K. Shepherd (1987)
Human impacts on some forests of the Middle Hills of Nepal. Part 3. Forests in the subsistence economy of Sindhu Palchok and Kabhre Palanchok.Mountain Research and Development, 7
K. Bontalakoti, B. Joshi, A. Mishra, B. Kothyari, R. Pande, R. Allen, H. Schreier, S. Brown, P. Shah (2000)
Rainfall variation and soil erosion in the Bheta Gad watershed of Uttar Pradesh in the central Himalayas.
R. Sundriyal, E. Sharma (1996)
Anthropogenic pressure on tree structure and biomass in the temperate forest of Mamlay watershed in SikkimForest Ecology and Management, 81
M. Misra, N. Sahu, B. Rao, S. Nisanka (1995)
Domestic fuel energy consumption in an Indian urban ecosystemBiomass & Bioenergy, 9
E.P. Eckhholm (1976)
Losing Ground
P.L. Sankhayan, O. Hofstad (2001)
An Economic Model for Analyzing Woodland Degradation in Sub-Saharan Africa
(1989)
The Himalayan Dilemma: Reconciling Development and Conservation
Julia Allen, Doug Barnes (1985)
The Causes of Deforestation in Developing CountriesAnnals of The Association of American Geographers, 75
S. Rubab, T. Kandpal (1996)
A methodology for financial evaluation of biogas technology in India using cost functionsBiomass & Bioenergy, 10
S. Enke (1971)
Projected Costs and Benefits of Population Control
E. Robbe (1954)
Report to the Government of Nepal on Forestry
This study analyzes the vegetative and soil degradation, measured as biomass and soil loss, for Arnigad micro-watershed located in Indian Himalayan state of Uttarakhand, in systems framework by using dynamic linear programming bio-economic model. The focus is at investigating the effects of alternate policy regimes, i.e., introduction of improved energy sources for cooking along with substitution of existing local livestock breeds with improved breed, reduction in human population growth and introduction of high yielding varieties of main crops including paddy, maize and wheat. The model horizon extended over a period of 25 years, i.e., from 2006 to 2030. It was found that the model scenario incorporating increased use of improved energy sources along with substitution of local cows by improved cows could be the most effective policy option in reducing vegetative and soil degradation. The vegetative biomass density declined to 19.76% compared to 35.24% in the BASE scenario and soil erosion loss was also lowered by 29.13%. Also, the reduction of population growth rate to half of the BASE scenario led to minor improvements in degradation. Introduction of high yielding varieties of main crops slightly increased vegetative degradation but reduced soil loss (8.35%) with respect to the BASE scenario. Such a phenomenon could be explained in terms of changed crop mix resulting in reduced amount of crop by-products requiring increased lopping of tree branches for animal fodder. The policy option of the increased use of improved energy sources along with substitution of improved breed of cows resulted in 9.58% higher income. Introduction of high yielding varieties of crops led to 1.92% increase in income, but the income decreased by 1.25 % when population growth was reduced to half. The usefulness of the model lies in analyzing the systems behavior in its entirety where the results can predict the possible direction of change as a result of manipulation in alternate economic regimes.
Journal of Mountain Science – Springer Journals
Published: Nov 9, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.