Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[The aim of this book is to provide a theory of causation in the special sciences (that is, a theory of causation in the social sciences, the biological sciences and other higher-level sciences). I attempt to reach this goal by pursuing a negative target and a positive target: the main negative target is to argue against a currently influential theory of causation, the interventionist theory of causation. The book will focus mainly on the interventionist theory developed in James Woodward’s (2003) book Making Things Happen. Counter-arguments against the interventionist theory will attempt to show that the central concept of the interventionist theory of causation — that is, the concept of a possible intervention — is immensely problematic. For this reason, I will argue that the interventionist theory of causation is not tenable. The main positive target of the book consists in replacing the interventionist approach with my own explication of causation in the special sciences, the comparative variability theory of causation.]
Published: Oct 6, 2015
Keywords: Special Science; Causal Statement; Causal Claim; Distinction Criterion; Naturalist Criterion
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.