Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Consent is central to traditional contract theories of freedom. On these accounts, consent grounds political obligation and political authority insofar as it creates or confers legitimacy onto the state or political institutions (Beran 1977; Simmons 1976).1 But the importance of consent to social freedom transcends legitimizing authority forces. Consent in the social sphere legitimizes the content of individuals’ lives and relations: work, friendship, love, sex, family, and community. Social relations, both personal and institutional, rely on individual consent to establish a link to whom and what one is connected. This makes consent necessary for one to function as a fully choosing subject in her relations. Supposing that conditions for social freedom obtain, consent signifies the absence of domination in relations. On this account, granting social consent to relation content serves to eliminate authority rather than legitimize it.2]
Published: Nov 9, 2015
Keywords: Social Relation; Social Power; Contract Theory; Social Reciprocity; Disciplinary Power
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.