Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[I will adopt and adapt a current distinction terminologically traceable to Peirce (1839–1914), among others—that between “type” and “token”—and use it to render into English the German distinction between Tatbestand and Tatsache (or Sachverhalt; cf. Kaufmann 1982—Arthur Kaufmann, 1923–2001).]
Published: Jan 1, 2005
Keywords: Pineal Gland; Legal Norm; Compound Type; Deontic Logic; Constitutive Rule
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.