Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[The distinction was introduced in Chapter 1 between the reality that ought to be and the reality that is. In the reality that ought to be a further distinction was made between what is objectively right (norms and their content) and what is subjectively right, meaning rights and obligations. What is subjectively right depends on the content of norms as well as on what this content refers to in the reality that is—to actual subjects (people), states of affairs, and events.]
Published: Jan 1, 2005
Keywords: Social Contract; Legal Norm; Legal Positivism; Moral Power; Enactment Procedure
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.