Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jian Li, P. Stoica (2013)
Robust Adaptive Beamforming
Qiang Wang, Qin Jiang (2010)
Simulation of Matched Field Processing Localization Based on Empirical Mode Decomposition and Karhunen-Loève Expansion in Underwater Waveguide EnvironmentEURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2010
A. Baggeroer, W. Kuperman, P. Mikhalevsky (1993)
An overview of matched field methods in ocean acousticsIEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 18
F. Jensen, W. Kuperman, M. Porter, H. Schmidt, S. McKay (1994)
Computational Ocean AcousticsComputers in Physics, 9
(2011)
Sonar Systems
Kilseok Cho, A. George, R. Subramaniyan, Keonwook Kim (2004)
PARALLEL ALGORITHMS FOR ADAPTIVE MATCHED-FIELD PROCESSING ON DISTRIBUTED ARRAY SYSTEMSJournal of Computational Acoustics, 12
Z. Xiao, Wen Xu, X. Gong (2009)
Robust matched field processing for source localization using convex optimizationOCEANS 2009-EUROPE
J. Gebbie (2014)
Advances in Aquatic Target Localization with Passive Sonar
A. Tolstoy (1992)
Matched Field Processing for Underwater Acoustics
Matched field processing (MFP) has been a method widely applied for shallow underwater target localization, which is a critical issue in underwater acoustic. To enhance the efficiency of conventional MFP methods, different adaptive MFP algorithms have been developed; the white noise constraints (WNC) MFP or diagonal loading (DL) algorithm is such a typical one. The WNC or DL one has been considered to be the most desirable method because it is more robust to environment mismatch in practical in comparison with the minimum-variance distortionless response MFP algorithm, a popular high-resolution method. Although having exceptional ability to localize underwater sources in mismatch scenarios, the DL method has still been not reach high resolution in certain cases. In the paper, we proposed an adaptive method known as improved diagonal loading algorithm to make an increase in the resolution and the peak background rate in the ambiguity surface of source localization results in comparison with DL one. The proposed algorithm works by adding one more parameter that is adjusted in the steering vector of the DL algorithm. The simulation results show that the new algorithm attains better beamforming performance in terms of high resolution than the existing adaptive MFP algorithms in the case of environmental mismatch caused by noise effects and the limitation of the snapshots.
Acoustics Australia – Springer Journals
Published: May 22, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.