Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Bülow, J. Björk, I. Christensen, O. Fausa, H. Järvinen, F. Moesgaard, H. Vasen (2004)
Duodenal adenomatosis in familial adenomatous polyposisGut, 53
K. Nugent, A. Spigelman, C. Williams, I. Talbot, R. Phillips (1994)
Surveillance of Duodenal Polyps in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: Progress ReportJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 87
C. Groves, B. Saunders, A. Spigelman, R. Phillips (2002)
Duodenal cancer in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP): results of a 10 year prospective studyGut, 50
M. Gallagher, R. Phillips, S. Bulow (2005)
Surveillance and management of upper gastrointestinal disease in Familial Adenomatous PolyposisFamilial Cancer, 5
S. Castro, C. Eijck, J. Rutten, C. Dejong, H. Goor, O. Busch, D. Gouma (2008)
Pancreas‐preserving total duodenectomy versus standard pancreatoduodenectomy for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and polyps in the duodenumBritish Journal of Surgery, 95
H. Vasen, G. Moslein, Á. Alonso, S. Aretz, I. Bernstein, L. Bertario, I. Blanco, Steffen Bülow, J. Burn, G. Capellá, C. Colas, C. Engel, I. Frayling, W. Friedl, F. Hes, S. Hodgson, H. Järvinen, Mecklin Jp, P. Møller, T. Myrhøi, F. Nagengast, Y. Parc, R. Phillips, S. Clark, M. León, L. Renkonen-Sinisalo, J. Sampson, A. Stormorken, S. Tejpar, Huber Thomas, J. Wijnen (2008)
Guidelines for the clinical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)Gut, 57
K. Nugent, A. Spigelman, R. Phillips (1993)
Life expectancy after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposisDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 36
H. Vasen, S. Bülow, T. Myrhøj, L. Mathus-vliegen, G. Griffioen, E. Buskens, B. Taal, F. Nagengast, J. Slors, P. Ruiter (1997)
Decision analysis in the management of duodenal adenomatosis in familial adenomatous polyposis.Gut, 40
A. Spigelman, I. Talbot, C. Williams, P. Domizio, R. Phillips (1989)
UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER IN PATIENTS WITH FAMILIAL ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSISThe Lancet, 334
R. Phillips, M. Wallace, P. Lynch, E. Hawk, G. Gordon, B. Saunders, N. Wakabayashi, Yu Shen, Stuart Zimmerman, L. Godio, M. Rodrigues-Bigas, L. Su, J. Sherman, G. Kelloff, B. Levin, G. Steinbach (2002)
A randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study of celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor, on duodenal polyposis in familial adenomatous polyposisGut, 50
S. Bülow, I. Christensen, H. Højen, J. Björk, M. Elmberg, H. Järvinen, A. Lepistö, M. Nieuwenhuis, H. Vasen (2012)
Duodenal surveillance improves the prognosis after duodenal cancer in familial adenomatous polyposisColorectal Disease, 14
L. Brosens, J. Keller, J. Keller, G. Offerhaus, G. Offerhaus, M. Goggins, F. Giardiello (2005)
Prevention and management of duodenal polyps in familial adenomatous polyposisGut, 54
S. Bushby, A. Harkness (1946)
Oral penicillin in gonorrhoea.Lancet, 2 6431
Duodenal polyposis is found in the majority of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Endoscopic surveillance programmes grade the severity of duodenal disease according to the Spigelman classification (stages 0–IV) to identify patients at risk of developing adenocarcinoma. To evaluate the progression of duodenal polyposis in patients with a previous diagnosis of Spigelman stage IV disease who have been downstaged by endoscopic or pharmacological means. A database search of a large polyposis registry identified patients who had been downstaged from stage IV disease and had further opportunity for disease progression. These patients were divided into three groups according to their new Spigelman stage. A measure of a patient’s disease progression was obtained by the increase in stage over the recommended follow up time period for their new, reduced, Spigelman stage. Group 1 (n = 16) were downstaged to stage III disease, with 50 % progressing back to stage IV over the recommended 1-year follow up period. Group 2 (n = 19) were downstaged to stage II disease, with 84 % progressing over the recommended 3-year follow up period. Group 3 (n = 6) were downstaged to stage I disease, with 100 % progressing over the recommended 5-year follow up period. Patients downstaged from Spigelman stage IV demonstrate an increased rate of disease progression in comparison to reported rates of primary disease progression. An amendment to the current endoscopic surveillance protocol is recommended to ensure that once a patient has been diagnosed with stage IV disease they are treated as a high-risk patient in perpetuity.
Familial Cancer – Springer Journals
Published: Jul 4, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.