Advances in Longitudinal HCI ResearchLongitudinal Studies in HCI Research: A Review of CHI Publications From 1982–2019
Advances in Longitudinal HCI Research: Longitudinal Studies in HCI Research: A Review of CHI...
Kjærup, Maria; Skov, Mikael B.; Nielsen, Peter Axel; Kjeldskov, Jesper; Gerken, Jens; Reiterer, Harald
2021-08-12 00:00:00
[Longitudinal studies in HCI research have the potential to increase our understanding of how human–technology interactions evolve over time. Potentially, longitudinal studies eliminate learning or novelty effects by considering change through repeated measurements of interaction and use. However, there seems to exist no agreement of how longitudinal HCI study designs are characterized. We conducted an analysis of 106 HCI papers published at the CHI conference from 1982 to 2019 where longitudinal studies were explicitly reported. We analysed these papers using classical longitudinal study metrics, e.g. duration, metrics, methods, change or stability. We illustrate that longitudinal studies in HCI research are highly diverse in terms of duration lasting from few days to several years and different metrics are applied. It appears that the paper contribution type highly influences study design, while only a little more than half of the papers discuss or illustrate change/stability during their studies. We further underline considerations of durations versus saturation, identifying points of measurements and matching contribution types with research questions. Finally, we urge researchers to extend implications presented on perceiving duration as a singular attribute, as well as longitudinal systematic approaches to ‘in situ’ studies and ethnography in HCI.]
http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.pnghttp://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journals/advances-in-longitudinal-hci-research-longitudinal-studies-in-hci-N01HtFYzVq
Advances in Longitudinal HCI ResearchLongitudinal Studies in HCI Research: A Review of CHI Publications From 1982–2019
[Longitudinal studies in HCI research have the potential to increase our understanding of how human–technology interactions evolve over time. Potentially, longitudinal studies eliminate learning or novelty effects by considering change through repeated measurements of interaction and use. However, there seems to exist no agreement of how longitudinal HCI study designs are characterized. We conducted an analysis of 106 HCI papers published at the CHI conference from 1982 to 2019 where longitudinal studies were explicitly reported. We analysed these papers using classical longitudinal study metrics, e.g. duration, metrics, methods, change or stability. We illustrate that longitudinal studies in HCI research are highly diverse in terms of duration lasting from few days to several years and different metrics are applied. It appears that the paper contribution type highly influences study design, while only a little more than half of the papers discuss or illustrate change/stability during their studies. We further underline considerations of durations versus saturation, identifying points of measurements and matching contribution types with research questions. Finally, we urge researchers to extend implications presented on perceiving duration as a singular attribute, as well as longitudinal systematic approaches to ‘in situ’ studies and ethnography in HCI.]
Published: Aug 12, 2021
Keywords: Longitudinal; Literature review; Study design; Duration; Change
Recommended Articles
Loading...
There are no references for this article.
Share the Full Text of this Article with up to 5 Colleagues for FREE
Sign up for your 14-Day Free Trial Now!
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
To get new article updates from a journal on your personalized homepage, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.