Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Alternative approaches to the definition and identification of learning disabilities: Some questions and answers

Alternative approaches to the definition and identification of learning disabilities: Some... Recent consensus reports concur in suggesting major changes in the federal regulatory approach to the identification of learning disabilities (LD). These reports recommend abandoning the IQ-discrepancy model and the use of IQ tests for identification, and also recommend incorporation of response to instruction (RTI) as one of the identification criteria. These changes are also recommended to states in the current reauthorization of the U.S. Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (IDEA). While not mandatory, states that follow these recommendations will experience major changes in identification and treatment of students served under the LD category. This paper reviews the basis for these recommendations, summarizing four recent consensus group reports on special education that concur in suggesting these changes. Seventeen commonly asked questions about these changes are presented, with responses. In order to ensure adequate instruction for students with LD, it is essential that identification practices focus on assessments that are directly related to instruction, that any services for students who are struggling prioritize intervention over eligibility, and that special education be permitted to focus more on results and outcomes and less on eligibility and process. Identification models that incorporate RTI represent a shift in special education toward the goals of better achievement and behavioral outcomes for students identified with LD, as well as those students at risk for LD. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Annals of Dyslexia Springer Journals

Alternative approaches to the definition and identification of learning disabilities: Some questions and answers

Download PDF
28 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/alternative-approaches-to-the-definition-and-identification-of-y3YNOL8eWE
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by The International Dyslexia Association
Subject
Linguistics; Languages and Literature; Psycholinguistics; Education (general); Neurology; Interdisciplinary Studies
ISSN
0736-9387
eISSN
1934-7243
DOI
10.1007/s11881-004-0015-y
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Recent consensus reports concur in suggesting major changes in the federal regulatory approach to the identification of learning disabilities (LD). These reports recommend abandoning the IQ-discrepancy model and the use of IQ tests for identification, and also recommend incorporation of response to instruction (RTI) as one of the identification criteria. These changes are also recommended to states in the current reauthorization of the U.S. Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (IDEA). While not mandatory, states that follow these recommendations will experience major changes in identification and treatment of students served under the LD category. This paper reviews the basis for these recommendations, summarizing four recent consensus group reports on special education that concur in suggesting these changes. Seventeen commonly asked questions about these changes are presented, with responses. In order to ensure adequate instruction for students with LD, it is essential that identification practices focus on assessments that are directly related to instruction, that any services for students who are struggling prioritize intervention over eligibility, and that special education be permitted to focus more on results and outcomes and less on eligibility and process. Identification models that incorporate RTI represent a shift in special education toward the goals of better achievement and behavioral outcomes for students identified with LD, as well as those students at risk for LD.

Journal

Annals of Dyslexia – Springer Journals

Published: Jun 9, 2004

References

  • The impending demise of the discrepancy formula
    Aaron, P. G.
  • Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention: A review of the literature
    Al-Otaiba, S.; Fuchs, D.
  • Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice
  • The backward child
    Burt, C.
  • Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has the quest led us astray?
    Christensen, C. A.
  • Bringing research-based practice to scale
    Denton, C.; Vaughn, S.; Fletcher, J. M.
  • Minority students in special and gifted education
    Donovan, M. S.; Cross, C. T.
  • The cognitive neuropsychology of developmental (and acquired) dyslexia: A critical survey
    Ellis, A. W.
  • Rethinking special education for a new century
  • Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice
    Fletcher, J. M.; Lyon, G. R.; Barnes, M.; Stuebing, K. K.; Francis, D. J.; Olson, R. K.; Shaywitz, S. E.; Shaywitz, B. A.
  • Handbook of learning disabilities
    Fletcher, J. M.; Morris, R. D.; Lyon, G. R.
  • Defining learning and language disabilities: Conceptual and psychometric issues with the use of IQ tests
    Francis, D. J.; Fletcher, J. M.; Shaywitz, B. A.; Shaywitz, S. E.; Rourke, B. P.
  • Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct
    Fuchs, D.; Mock, D.; Morgan, P. L.; Young, C. L.
  • Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing identification of learning disabilities
    Fuchs, L. S.; Fuchs, D.
  • Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice
    Gresham, F. M.
  • Treatment integrity of school-based intervention studies: 1980–1990
    Gresham, F. M.; Gansle, K. A.; Noell, G. H.; Cohen, S.; Rosenblum, S.
  • Learning disabilities, low achievement, and mild mental retardation: More alike than different?
    Gresham, F. M.; MacMillan, D. L.; Bocian, K. M.
  • Developmental dyslexia: An update on genes, brains, and environments
    Grigorenko, E. L.
  • Learning disability and cultural disadvantage: The case for a relationship
    Kavale, K. A.
  • The handbook of school psychology
    Kavale, K. A.; Forness, S. R.
  • What definitions of learning disability say and don’t say: A critical analysis
    Kavale, K. A.; Forness, S. R.
  • Specific learning disabilities: Finding common ground
  • Child psychopathology (vol. II)
    Lyon, G. R.; Fletcher, J. M.; Barnes, M. C.
  • Rethinking special education for a new century
    Lyon, G. R.; Fletcher, J. M.; Shaywitz, S. E.; Shaywitz, B. A.; Torgesen, J. K.; Wood, F. B.; Schulte, A.; Olson, R.
  • Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice
    MacMillan, D. L.; Siperstein, G. N.
  • Developmental perspectives on children with high-incidence disabilities
    MacMillan, D. L.; Speece, D. L.
  • Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction
  • Learner characteristics that influence the treatment effectiveness of early literacy interventions: A meta-analytic review
    Nelson, J. R.; Benner, G. J.; Gonzalez, J.
  • Reading for understanding
  • Special education in transition: Functional assessment and noncategorical programming
    Reschly, D. J.; Tilly, W. D.; Grimes, J. P.
  • And miles to go. ...: State SLD requirements and authoritative recommendations
    Reschly, D. J.; Hosp, J. L.; Schmied, C. M.
  • On babies and bathwater: Addressing the problems of identification of learning disabilities
    Scruggs, T. E.; Mastropieri, M. A.
  • Dyslexia
    Shaywitz, S. E.
  • An evaluation of the regression discrepancy method for identifying children with learning disabilities
    Shepard, L.
  • Dyslexia-specific brain activation profile becomes normal following successful remedial training
    Simos, P. G.; Fletcher, J. M.; Bergman, E.; Breier, J. I.; Foorman, B. R.; Castillo, E. M.; Fitzgerald, M.; Papanicolaou, A. C.
  • Preventing reading difficulties in young children
    Snow, C. E.; Burns, M. S.; Griffin, P.
  • Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers
    Stanovich, K. E.
  • Validity of IQ-discrepancy classifications of reading disabilities: A meta-analysis
    Stuebing, K. K.; Fletcher, J. M.; LeDoux, J. M.; Lyon, G. R.; Shaywitz, S. E.; Shaywitz, B. A.
  • Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice
    Torgesen, J. K.
  • Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches
    Torgesen, J. K.; Alexander, A. W.; Wagner, R. K.; Rashotte, C. A.; Voeller, K. K. S.; Conway, T.
  • Assistance to states for education for handicapped children: Procedures for evaluating specific learning disabilities
  • Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ-Achievement discrepancy definition of reading disability
    Vellutino, F. R.; Scanlon, D. M.; Lyon, G. R.
  • Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale
    Vellutino, F. R.; Scanlon, D. M.; Jaccard, J.
  • Changes over the past decade in special education referral to placement probability: An incredibly reliable practice
    Ysseldyke, J. E.; Vanderwood, M. L.; Shriner, J.