Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[This chapter analyses the Neo-Byzantine (or as it is called after the fall of communism, “Neo-Orthodox”) stylistic tendencies recuperated in the post-communist Romanian cultural-political sphere. Some styles and thematic clusters of religious inspiration (of Neo-Byzantine descent) that emerged in the 1980s as a peripheral cultural phenomenon in relation to the official culture of Ceauṣescu’s national communism were recuperated and developed after the fall of the regime, becoming—for a while—a mainstream cultural phenomenon. This exploration includes a critical survey of what was called during communism “Neo-Byzantinism,” as well as its moves towards the post-communist denominations of “Neo-Orthodoxism” and “Neo-Traditionalism.” Thus, this chapter asks whether these denominations accurately reveal the Neo-Orthodox artists’ set of concerns.]
Published: Oct 23, 2020
Keywords: Neo-Orthodox artists; Neo-Byzantine artists; Prolog art group; Neo-Traditionalism; National communism’s culture
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.