Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
FW Martin (1970)
Compounds of the stigmatic surface of Zea mays LAnn Bot, 34
S Ghose, KR Shivanna (1984)
Structure and cytochemistry of the stigma and pollen-pistil interaction in ZephyranthusAnn Bot, 53
Y Heslop-Harrison (1981)
Stigma characteristics and angiosperm I, taxonomyNord J Bot, 1
K Benes (1968)
On the stainability of pollen cell walls with alcian blueBiolia Plant, 10
A Rana (2009)
Morphological differences in the stigma of fruit bearing and fruitless plants of Kigelia pinnata DC. (Bignoniaceae)J Plant Reprod Biol, 1
MK Kandasamy, MK Thorsness, SJ Rundle, ML Goldberg, JB Nasrallah, ME Nasrallah (1993)
Ablation of papillar cell function in Brassica flowers results in the loss of stigma receptivity to pollinationPlant Cell, 5
A Fahn (1988)
Secretory tissue in vascular plantsNew Phytol, 108
MV Gonzalez, M Coque, M Herrero (1995)
Papillar integrity as an indicator of stigma receptivity in kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa)J Exp Bot, 46
RL Nicholson, R Hammerschmidt (1992)
Phenolic compounds and their role in disease resistanceAnnu Rev Phytopathol, 30
Y Heslop-Harrison, KR Shivanna (1977)
The receptive surface of the angiosperm stigmaAnn Bot, 41
M Raina, R Kumar, V Kaul (2017)
Stigmatic limitations on reproductive success in a paleotropical tree: causes and consequencesAoB Plants, 9
S Verma, R Magotra, AK Koul (2001)
Tropical ecosystems: structure, diversity and human welfare
J Kenrick, RB Knox (1981)
Post pollination exudate from stigmas of Acacia (Mimosaceae)Ann Bot, 48
JB Nasrallah, ME Nasrallah (1993)
Pollen-stigma signalling in the sporophytic self-incompatibility responsePlant Cell, 5
J Heslop-Harrison, Y Heslop-Harrison, RB Knox, B Howlett (1973)
Pollen wall proteins: gametophytic and sporophytic fractions in the pollen wall of the MalvaceaeAnn Bot, 37
M Cresti, A Tiezzi (2011)
Sexual plant reproduction
N Feder, TP O’Brien (1968)
Plant microtechniques: some principles and new methodsAm J Bot, 55
KV Krishnamurthy (1999)
Methods in cell wall cytochemistry
E Szember, S Wocior (1991)
Influence of flavanoids and other phenolic compounds on pollen germination and growth of the pollen tubeFruit Sci Rep, 28
AT Slater, DM Calder (1990)
Fine structure of the wet, detached cell stigma of the orchid Dendrobrium speciosum SmSex Plant Reprod, 3
M Stpiczynska (2003)
Stigma receptivity during the life span of Platanthera chlorantha Custar (Rchib.) flowersActa Biol Crac Ser Bot, 45/1
KR Shivanna, NS Rangaswamy (1992)
Pollen biology?a laboratory manual
SK Kulloli, R Ramasubbu, AK Sreekala, AG Pandurangan (2010)
Cytochemical localization of stigma surface esterases in three species of Impatiens (Balsaminaceae) of Western GhatsAsian J Exp Biol Sci, 1
AH Gentry (1976)
Relationships of the Madagascar Bignoniaceae: a striking case of convergent evolutionPlant Syst Evolut, 126
C Galen, JA Shykoff, RC Plowright (1986)
Consequences of stigma receptivity schedules for sexual selection in flowering plantsAm Soc Nat, 127
J Heslop-Harrison, Y Heslop-Harrison (1985)
Surfaces and secretions in the pollen-stigma interaction: a brief reviewJ Cell Sci Suppl, 2
The stigma of Kigelia pinnata is spathulate, wet and sensitive to touch. Consisting of two flaps or folds, the inner surface of these stigmatic flaps is papillate. Covered by a prominent papillar zone, each papilla contains lipid and phenolic deposits which remain entrapped below the thick cuticle till the stigma attains receptivity. Gradual unfolding of stigmatic flaps; about 1 h post anthesis, marks the beginning of stigma receptivity. Reaching a peak at 24 h after anthesis, the stigma remains receptive for 48 h. Papillae gradually lose turgidity after 72 h post anthesis and liberate their contents into the outside medium. During this time, stigma receptivity declines sharply as can be made out from the germination of only 10% pollen. Thereafter, none of the pollen deposited on the stigma germinates. The papillar phenology exhibits a close coordination with stigma receptivity indicating that both the processes are proportionately related to each other. Therefore, evaluation of papillar integrity can be used as a quick method to check stigma receptivity in K. pinnata.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 4, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.