Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Bibliometric analysis of biochar research in 2021: a critical review for development, hotspots and trend directions

Bibliometric analysis of biochar research in 2021: a critical review for development, hotspots... 1 Introduction organisms (Woolf et  al. 2010; Wu et  al. 2021a). Many Biochar is a pyrogenic carbon-rich material formed processes can be used to produce biochar such as slow through the thermal decomposition of biomass feed- and fast pyrolysis, microwave-assisted pyrolysis, hydro- stock under an oxygen-limited condition (Hagemann thermal carbonization, gasification, flash carboniza - et  al. 2017; Inyang et  al. 2015; Woolf et  al. 2021). It tion, and torrefaction (Kostas et  al. 2020; Wu et  al. has been established that different biomass materials 2020; Wu et  al. 2021a; Xiao et  al. 2018) (Fig.  1). Slow have been utilized to produce biochar which entails pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization are the most agricultural waste, forestry waste, garden waste, food frequently used methods for the preparation of bio- waste, livestock manure, sewage sludge, and aquatic char (Dutta et  al. 2021; Lian and Xing 2017). Biochar Wu  et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 3 of 21 is a heterogeneous mixture containing both amorphous Meanwhile, the improvement in soil functions after less-carbonized fractions and microcrystalline graph- biochar application is beneficial to alleviate the salinity ite-like aromatic structures. It has special properties, and drought stress on plants (Mansoor et  al. 2021; Zhu such as highly developed porosity, high specific surface et  al. 2020). Finally, the multifunctional characteristic of area (SSA), abundant surface functional groups, and biochar makes it an effective material for environmental high content of mineral components. Biochar proper- pollution (Ahmad et al. 2014; Nidheesh et al. 2021). The ties are mainly regulated by feedstock composition and biochar’s multiple functions are connected to its physico- preparation procedures (Ahmad et  al. 2014; Cha et  al. chemical properties (Manya 2012; Zhang et  al. 2021g). 2016; Lian and Xing 2017). Considering the striking heterogeneity in physicochemi- Biochar has received increasing attention for its poten- cal properties of biochar, an in-depth understanding of tial benefits in carbon sequestration, climate change miti - the developments of biochar regarding its multifunc- gation, waste management, bioenergy production, soil tional applications is urgently required. improvement, and pollution control due to its unique Although several meta-analyses and review studies properties (Nidheesh et  al. 2021; Xiao et  al. 2018; Yang have been carried out to evaluate biochar’s multifunc- et  al. 2021e). Biochar has a high recalcitrant carbon (C) tional applications systematically, very few have investi- content and the strong adsorption capacity to carbon gated current trends and scientific developments in this dioxide (CO ). Its sustainable production and field appli - field. A conclusive study was performed here and could cations enable its great potential for long-term carbon help us to identify the main subject fields, the current storage and carbon emission reduction, thereby mitigat- research frontiers, and hotspots of biochar research ing climate change (Feng et  al. 2021b; Yang et  al. 2021e; (Wu et al. 2019; Wu et al. 2021a). Because new biochar Zhang et al. 2022). The conversion of biowaste, especially applications emerge, the main signs of progress and sewage sludge, into biochar through pyrolysis provides insights associated with this field will change over time. an alternative and promising way of managing waste bio- Additionally, the unintended consequences of biochar mass (Chen et al. 2020). The produced biochar can act as application are likely to emerge after long-term bio- a catalyst for bioenergy production (Malyan et al. 2021). char application. Therefore, it is necessary to provide Again, biochar positively affects plant productivity and an analytical overview of the main signs of progress and crop yields by improving soil quality and fertility levels insights into biochar research in 2021. (Farkas et al. 2020). Fig. 1 Biochar production and modification. Modified from Wu et al. (2020) Wu et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 4 of 21 Bibliometric analysis proceeded by Citespace software sharply, and this growth trend will continue, which indi- has gained rising interest in many fields due to its math - cates the huge and increasing attention as well as the ematical statistics and visual analytic functions (Chen increased amount of scientific knowledge of biochar 2004, 2017; Ren et al. 2021). It is believed to be an effec - research. tive tool for quantitatively evaluating a given field’s cur - rent situation and emerging trends (Kamali et  al. 2020). 3.2 Contributing country analysis In this study, a combined bibliometric analysis and criti- As can be realized from Additional file  1: Fig. S2 and cal appraisal of the related documents were utilized to Table  S1, China is the highest contributing country, quantitatively identify the research status and trend of accounting for 43.99% of the total publications. This is biochar in 2021. The aims of this review are to: (1) ana - most likely because China is a great agricultural country lyze the primary authors, countries, and keyword fre- with a large population, where agriculture occupies a sig- quency and hotspot trend of the publications; (2) identify nificant and strategic position in the national economy. the current trends and hot topics in the biochar field; (3) China was followed by the USA, with 504 publications, provide perspectives on full-scale applications of biochar. accounting for 9.11%. Besides China and USA, India, Paki- stan, South Korea, Australia, Canada, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, 2 Methods and Germany also have many scientific documents. Many 2.1 Literature search connections between countries indicate robust global A systematic literature search was conducted from the cooperation and communication in this field. Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection database using the keyword of "Biochar" in the title, keywords, and 3.3 Research institution analysis abstract (Ren et  al. 2021). A total of 5533 documents The top 10 institutions with the most publications in the were collected from the database in 2021. To guarantee field of biochar research are summarized in Additional the validity of data collected, the synonyms associated file  1: Table  S2. Chinese Academy of Sciences published with biochar research, such as “Cadmium” and “Cd”, “car- the largest number of papers in this field, followed by the bon dioxide” and “CO ”, “anaerobic digestion” and “AD”, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences and Zhejiang “nanoscale zero-valent iron” and “nZVI”, and “polycy- University. The Chinese Academy of Sciences is expected clic aromatic hydrocarbon” and “PAHs” were manually to be the leading institution in many fields. It can also be merged. found that 8 institutions were from China among the top 10 productive institutions. 2.2 S cientometrics analysis tools Cite-space is a new statistical analysis tool widely used 3.4 Keyword analysis for bibliometric analysis and visualization (Li et al. 2020; 3.4.1 Bio char for toxic metal immobilization Ren et al. 2021). It is a Java-based software first developed Biochar utilized for immobilizing toxic metals has caused by Professor Chaomei Chen and his team in 2004 (Chen the interest of researchers in 2021 (Fig.  2). Keyword co- 2004). Relevant documents were exported from the occurrence analysis suggested that the most studied toxic “marked list” (with “plain text” format) of WoS Core Col- metal was Cd (Table  1). Such heightened research inter lection and then inserted in Cite-space (5.3.R4) to ana- est in Cd was due to its being highly toxic and carcino- lyze their specific characteristics. The visual analysis of genic even at low concentrations (Purkayastha et al. 2014; cooperation networks of authors, contributing countries, Rai et al. 2019). institutions, categories, and keywords helps to reveal the The transformation of sewage sludge to biochar via clustering, knowledge structure, and emerging trends of pyrolysis provides a feasible approach for the safe dis biochar research. In the co-occurrence network maps, posal of the sludge (Buss 2021; Zhang et  al. 2021f ). The each node corresponds to one item (e.g., author, institu- sewage sludge-derived biochar had a much lower leach- tion, keyword), and lines link the nodes. The higher the ing potential of heavy metals than the sewage sludge itself node’s frequency, the larger the node’s size. The thickness (Wang et al. 2021d; Xiong et al. 2021). Recently, co-pyrol- of the line indicates the cooperation degree between the ysis of sewage sludge and waste biomass (e.g., rice straw, two nodes. rice husk, cotton stalk, and sawdust) has been proven to improve the porous structure and reduce the leaching 3 Results and discussion toxicity of heavy metals in sewage sludge-derived biochar 3.1 P ublications about biochar research (Tong et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2021d, 2021f, 2021g; Xiong A total of 5533 documents were extracted from WoS et al. 2021). Another study also reported that co-pyrolysis Core Collection in 2021 (Additional file  1: Fig. S1). It can of sewage sludge and calcium sulfate was conducive to be seen that the annual number of publications increased Wu  et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 5 of 21 Fig. 2 Keyword co-occurrence map of biochar research in 2021 Table 1 The top 20 keywords related to biochar research in 2021 shown promising results. The abundant mineral constitu - ents in sewage sludge-derived biochar, such as Si, Al, Fe, Rank Keyword Frequency and Ca, greatly participated in cationic metal removal via 1 Biochar 2774 cation exchange, complexation, and precipitation (Gopi- 2 Adsorption 1064 nath et al. 2021; Islam et al. 2021; Jellali et al. 2021). 3 Removal 716 Engineered biochar has gained much attention in terms 4 Pyrolysis 668 of immobilizing toxic metals in 2021. Modification may 5 Heavy metal 605 improve the carbon content, SSA, porous structure, 6 Aqueous solution 573 functional groups, and stability of biochar. Recently, 7 Bioma 545 metal oxides and salts have been widely used for biochar 8 Carbon 486 modification. Magnetic or metal-based biochar syn - 9 Activated carbon 484 thesized by using the transition metals (e.g., Fe, Co, Ni) 10 Sorption 449 and their oxides (e.g., F e O and Fe O ) with waste bio- 2 3 3 4 11 Water 448 mass exhibits advantages over pristine biochar in heavy 12 Soil 439 metal immobilization. For instance, a novel functional 13 Mechanism 419 colloid-like magnetic biochar with high dispersibility 14 Waste 327 synthesized via impregnation of Fe(II)/Fe(III)/artificial 15 Cadmium 325 humic acid onto corn stalk-derived biochar followed by 16 Pyrolysis temperature 312 torrefaction activation exhibited superior removal per- 17 Performance 311 formance for Cd (the maximum adsorption capacity of −1 18 Sewage sludge 303170 mg  g ) (Yang et al. 2021c). The removal mechanisms 19 Waste water 297 included ion exchange, Cd–π interaction, complexation, 20 Temperature 294 and precipitation (Fig.  3a). Hierarchically porous mag- netic biochar produced from K FeO pre-treated wheat 2 4 −1 straw at 700 °C effectively removed Cd by 80 mg  g (Fu immobilizing heavy metals in sewage sludge-derived bio- et  al. 2021b). The pre- and post-heat treatment modi - char (Liu et al. 2021a). The application of sewage sludge- fication with Fe could produce Fe-loaded biochar with derived biochar as a sorbent for toxic metal removal has different properties. Generally, the Fe pre-modification Wu et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 6 of 21 Fig. 3 Possible pathways for the removal of toxic metals by biochar. Cd removal mechanisms by functional colloid-like magnetic biochar (a) (Yang et al. 2021c); Hg(II) removal mechanisms by sulfurized magnetic biochar (b) (Hsu et al. 2021); As(III) removal mechanisms by M nO -biochar composite (c) (Cuong et al. 2021) Wu  et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 7 of 21 loaded greater Fe O micro-/nanoparticles on biochar Although most of the positive results are achieved for 3 4 and achieved greater surface area, while the Fe post- acidic heavy metal-contaminated soil amended with bio- modification enriched oxygen-containing functional char, there needs to be more research on the remediation groups on biochar (Reynel-Ávila et  al. 2021; Zhao et  al. effect of biochar on alkaline heavy metal-contaminated 2021b). Hsu et al. (2021) synthesized sulfurized magnetic soil. Previous studies showed that conventional biochar biochar via a single heating step. The product had high showed no significant remediation effect in alkaline soil. adsorption for Hg(II) (the maximum adsorption capacity Meanwhile, biochar amendment might reduce soil fertil- −1 of 8.93 mg  g ), and C-S functional groups were the vital ity and cause soil alkalization. Fe- and Fe/Zn-modified adsorptive sites for Hg(II) (Fig. 3b). biochar application promoted the transformation of For metal anions (mainly As and Cr), biochar-based exchangeable Cd into oxidizable and residual Cd (Sun composites are effective sorbents for Cr and As. An et  al. 2021c; Yang et  al. 2021g). Moreover, Fe-modified active MnO -biochar composite was prepared to enhance biochar increased the richness and diversity of bacterial As(III) removal from the aqueous solution. The removal communities in the alkaline contaminated soil (Sun et al. mechanisms involved partial As(III) adsorption and the 2021c). The combination of biochar with ferrous sulfate oxidation of As(III) to As(V) by MnO . The generated and pig manure is also reported to effectively immobilize As(V) could be removed by forming MnHAsO4⋅H2O Cd and reduce Cd uptake by wheat in the alkaline con- precipitation with Mn(II), complexation with Mn-OH taminated soil (Chen et al. 2021b). groups on the MnO surface, and O-containing func- tional groups on the biochar surface (Fig.  3c) (Cuong 3.4.2 Bio char‑based catalyst for biofuel production et  al. 2021). Nano zero-valent iron (nZVI) modified The employment of biochar as heterogeneous catalysts biochar has been proven to be a promising remediation for biofuel production gained much attention in 2021. material for Cr removal (Zhou et al. 2021b; Zhuang et al. Biochar-based catalyst possesses sustainable feedstock 2021). For instance, Zhuang et  al. (2021) synthesized availability, abundant surface functional groups and inor- sulfidated nZVI-supported biochar for Cr(VI) removal. ganic species, a hierarchical and well-developed porous The porous structure of biochar and sulfidated nZVI structure, and tunable surface functionality (Chi et  al. dispersed on biochar surface could provide adsorption 2021; Low and Yee 2021). sites for Cr(VI). Then, Fe and generated Fe(II) acted as Using biochar-based heterogeneous catalysts for bio- electron donors to reduce Cr(VI). The generated Cr(III) diesel production is still a great research hotspot in 2021. would form co-precipitation with Fe(III) and be removed The presence of biochar-based catalyst promoted the from the aqueous solution. transesterification or esterification of waste cooking oil, The employment of biochar in reducing the bio - vegetable oil, animal oil, or fats (Chi et al. 2021; Cho et al. availability and phytotoxicity of toxic metals in soil has 2021; Low and Yee 2021). Swine manure-derived biochar attracted growing interest. However, pristine biochar has could act as an alkaline catalyst for the transesterification a limited effect on the remediation of toxic metal-con - lipid fraction extracted from the swine manure (Fig.  4a). taminated soils (Arabi et al. 2021; El-Naggar et al. 2021). A high yield of biodiesel (≥ 94%) was achieved with the It was found that biochar, especially rice straw-derived application of the catalyst (Cho et al. 2021). A maximum biochar application contributed to the reduction of As(V) biodiesel yield of 96.4% was obtained with methanol: oil to As(III), which increased the potential mobility of As ratio of 9:1 at 70  °C for 2  h using K CO + Cu(NO ) - 2 3 3 2 in soils (El-Naggar et al. 2021). Heat treatment tempera- treated hydrochar-derived catalyst (Fig.  4b) (Abdullah ture (HTT) is a predominant parameter influencing As et  al. 2021). Likewise, Nazir et  al. (2021) obtained a bio- mobility in soil. A meta-analysis indicated that biochar diesel yield of 89.19% at 60 °C for 15 min in the transes- produced under low HTT (≤ 450  °C) did not affect As terification of oil with methanol at a molar ratio of 1:18, mobility in soil, but high-temperature biochar (> 450 °C) catalyzed by H SO -modified biochar. Moreover, the 2 4 exhibited high As mobilization in soil (Arabi et al. 2021). biochar-based catalyst exhibited high reusability and sta- Fe-modified biochar exhibited efficient removal of As bility with a minor loss in its activity after being reused from soil and reduced its mobility in paddy soil (Wen for six cycles. Microwave-assisted biofuel production has et  al. 2021). Similarly, Fe/Al/Zn (hydr)oxides modified recently gained great attention due to the advantages of biochar significantly reduced As uptake by arugula (Sun microwave heating (i.e., quick heating rate and energy et  al. 2021b). More importantly, Fe-modified biochar efficiency) (Nazir et al. 2021; Zailan et al. 2021). could be considered an efficient remediation material Syngas, produced through biomass gasification, usu - for moderately and highly Cd- and As-co-contaminated ally consists of H , CO, C H, CO , and other hydrocar- 2 4 2 farmland (Wen et al. 2021; Yang et al. 2021a, b). bons such as bio-oil or tar (Low and Yee 2021; Sun et al. 2021a). The addition of biochar as a catalyst for syngas Wu et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 8 of 21 Fig. 4 Employment of biochar as heterogeneous catalysts for biofuel production. Biodiesel production through biochar-catalyzed transesterification of lipid fraction extracted from the swine manure (a) (Cho et al. 2021); Biodiesel production with K CO + Cu(NO ) -treated 2 3 3 2 hydrochar as a catalyst (b) (Abdullah et al. 2021) production and upgrading has been largely reported a catalytic effect on tar removal (Feng et  al. 2021a ; Hu recently. Biochar-based catalysts have several advan- et  al. 2021a; Liu et  al. 2021c). By using walnut shell bio- tages in tar reforming and syngas cleaning: (1) the highly char with high contents of K O and CaO as a catalyst, the porous structure and large SSA are conducive to prolong- conversion efficiency of tar and H -rich gas production ing the retention time of the reactants and improving increased (Mazhkoo et  al. 2021). Anniwaer et  al. (2021) their conversion efficiency; (2) the abundant functional reported that biochar derived from Japanese cedarwood groups favor the reforming of volatiles from biomass heat possessed a highly porous structure and contained high treatment; and (3) the alkali and alkali earth metals and contents of alkali and alkaline earth metals, which might other inorganic species present in biochar can provide provide high catalytic activity for tar reforming. In this Wu  et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 9 of 21 study, 99% of the remaining tar was cracked/reformed, carbon sequestration potential of biochar produced from yielding H -rich syngas. Metal-supported biochar exhib- various crop residues. It was found that over 920 kg CO 2 2e ited excellent catalytic activity in syngas upgrading. Hu t- (CO -equivalent) sequestration could be achieved in et  al. (2021a) loaded Fe–Ni on pine wood biochar as a China, demonstrating great carbon sequestration poten- catalyst for syngas production; their results indicated tial through biochar that was incorporated into soil that Fe–Ni-supported biochar significantly increased H / (Fig. 5a). Similarly, Leppäkoski et al. (2021) calculated the CO ratio to 1.97 in syngas. In addition, Fe–Ni-supported carbon footprint of willow biochar production and appli- biochar still exhibited excellent catalytic activity after five cation in marginal lands by conducting a cradle-to-grave times of reuse. Similarly, an H concentration of 67.35% LCA. Their results found that the carbon footprint of −1 in syngas and a gasification efficiency of 96.93% could willow biochar was − 1875 kg CO t , in which carbon 2e −1 achieve by using Fe/Ca/Al-loaded biochar as a catalyst sequestration (− 1704 kg CO t ) dominated the carbon 2e (Hu et  al. 2021b). In short, engineered biochar has tre- footprint. It is estimated that 63 − 82% of initial carbon mendous promise as a catalyst in syngas upgrading. in biochar was stably sequestered in soil after 100  years of using a greenhouse gas inventory model (Woolf et  al. 3.4.3 Biochar for global climate change mitigation 2021). These results indicate the long-term sequestration Biochar production and amendment have been increas- of carbon by biochar storage in soil. ingly adopted to mitigate global climate change (Woolf Biochar also has a high potential for CO capture and et  al. 2021). China’s rising influence on global climate storage (Shafawi et  al. 2021). It has been reported that change mitigation advances biochar’s role in climate gov- a large surface area, high micro-porosity, and abundant ernance. The functionality of biochar to achieve carbon– mineral contents of biochar contributed to C O capture neutral goals is mainly through carbon sequestration and (Feng et  al. 2021b; Shafawi et  al. 2021). To highlight, emission reduction (Cao et al. 2021; Nan et al. 2021). The N-doped biochar showed a superior C O uptake capac- high content of aromatic carbon within biochar is the ity. The N-doped biochar prepared by urea phosphate basis of its carbon sequestration benefits (Xu et al. 2021). impregnation-pyrolysis had a superior CO adsorption −1 Biochar storage in soil via agricultural soil management capacity of 1.34  mmol  g (Ma et  al. 2021). The excel - can also realize carbon sequestration (Guenet et al. 2021). lent adsorption property of CO was attributed to the Therefore, converting biomass waste into biochar and enhanced microporous structure and various N-contain- storing the produced biochar in soil has excellent poten- ing functional groups on the biochar (Fig.  5b). A related tial for carbon sequestration. Yang et  al. (2021d) used a study by Feng et  al. (2021b) showed that NH ·H O 3 2 life cycle assessment at the country level to evaluate the activation was beneficial to forming micropores and Fig. 5 Country-level potential of carbon sequestration for biochar implementation (a) (Yang et al. 2021d); The removal mechanisms of C O by N-doped biochar (b) (Ma et al. 2021); The removal mechanisms of CO by NH ·H O-activated biochar (c) (Feng et al. 2021b); The mitigation 2 3 2 mechanisms of N O Emission by biochar at the cellular level (d) (Zhang et al. 2021 g) 2 Wu et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 10 of 21 introducing N-containing functional groups on biochar resulted from the decrease in nitrifier denitrification (by surfaces. The N-containing functional groups dominated 74%) and heterotrophic denitrification (by 58%) (Zhang the adsorption of CO (Fig. 5c). et  al. 2021e). The N stable isotope tracing techniques Nitrous oxide (N O) has a global warming potential may help to fully understand N O emission mitigation 2 2 of 298 times that of C O , which plays an essential role mechanisms by biochar. in global warming (Zhang et  al. 2021g). Excessive appli- Biochar has been well-reported to mitigate C H emis- cation of N fertilization and low N use efficiency are sions from paddy soil (Dong et al. 2021; Jiang et al. 2021; the primary sources of soil N O emissions (Reay et  al. Qi et al. 2021b). The mechanisms of CH emission miti- 2 4 2012; Tian et  al. 2019). Numerous studies have demon- gation by biochar mainly included: (i) biochar inhibited strated the effectiveness of biochar in mitigating N O the activity and abundance of methanogens but stimu- emissions (Deng et al. 2021a; Jiang et al. 2021; Shin et al. lated those of methanotrophs (Nan et  al. 2021); (ii) bio- 2021). Lower N O emissions involved several mecha- char increased the adsorption of CH in soil (Zhao et al. 2 4 nisms, which included abiotic N retention mechanisms 2021a). Contrastingly, other studies have found that bio- and microbial N immobilization mechanisms (Guenet char amendment increased CH emissions from paddy et  al. 2021; Lehmann et  al. 2021; Liao et  al. 2021). The soils (Cao et al. 2021; Yang et al. 2021h). The unintended promoted microbial reduction of N O to N by biochar consequence of an increase in CH emissions may result 2 2 4 amendment was believed to be a permanent mitigation from the improved aeration condition after biochar benefit as the transformation could not be reversed, and application (Cao et al. 2021). Moreover, biochar’s geocon- N had left the soil system. The microbial reduction of ductor function could directly transfer electrons to meth- N O to N could result from an increased expression of anogens, stimulating CH production (Yang et al. 2021h). 2 2 4 denitrification-associated functional genes (e.g., nosZ, The contradictory studies could be due to the differences nirK, nirK, and narG) (Deng et al. 2021a; Liao et al. 2021; in biochar and soil properties (Malyan et  al. 2021; Yang Wu et  al. 2021b). Additionally, biochar could act as an et al. 2021h). Based on the discussions, biochar has great electron shuttle to facilitate electron transfer and N O potential in mitigating C H emissions from paddy soils. 2 4 reduction through biochar’s O-containing functional However, scientific soil management and proper biochar groups and carbon matrices (Yuan et al. 2021; Zhao et al. are necessary to avoid the unintended consequence of 2021c). It is important to note that the positive effects increased CH production. of biochar on denitrification metabolism could be elu - cidated at the cellular level by integrating physiological 3.4.4 Bio char for salinity and drought stress amelioration and multi-omics (proteomic and metabolomics) analy- Biochar has the potential to enhance salinity tolerance to ses (Zhang et  al. 2021g). It was observed that biochar plants by improving soil physical (porosity, water hold- could directly modulate carbon metabolism and allocate ing capacity, hydraulic conductivity, pH, SOC), chemi- the produced reducing power, thereby promoting N O cal (Na bioavailability, cation–anion exchange capacity, reduction (Fig. 5d). N stable isotope tracing techniques nutrients, enzymatic activities), and biological (microbial have been widely used to gain insight into N O emissions activities, symbiotic N -fixation) properties (Farhangi- 2 2 in biochar-amended soils (Craswell et  al. 2021). Zhang Abriz and Ghassemi-Golezani 2021; Singh et  al. 2021). 15 18 et  al. (2021c) utilized a dual isotope (   N– O) labeling Incorporating biochar in salt-affected soil improved 2+ 2+ + technique to differentiate the contribution of nitrifier soluble cation (Ca, Mg ) contents but decreased N a nitrification, nitrifier denitrification, nitrification-coupled concentration through its high sorption capacity. The 2+ + denitrification, and heterotrophic denitrification to soil higher Ca concentration and lower Na concentration N O emissions amended with biochar. Their results indi - facilitated K and P uptake by plants and thus promoted cated that biochar reduced N O emissions derived from plant productivity (Zhou et  al. 2021d). It was also found nitrifier denitrification by 45–94%, nitrification-coupled that biochar amendment in saline soil increased photo- denitrification by 30–64%, and heterotrophic denitrifica - synthetic rate, leaf water content, stomatal conductance, tion by 35–46%. Biochar application for N O emission pigment contents, nutrient uptake, and root and shoot mitigation was due to the decrease of nitrite concen- growth (Cui et  al. 2021a; Farhangi-Abriz and Ghassemi- tration while increasing N O reduction (Zhang et  al. Golezani 2021; Liang et  al. 2021c; Singh et  al. 2021). In 2021c). A long-term field study also used a dual isotope some cases, toxic metal contamination and soil salinity 15 18 (   N– O) labeling technique to measure the effects of may cause a more serious environmental concern. Soil biochar on N O emissions; the results showed that bio- salinity may aggravate the stress caused by toxic metals char decreased N O emissions by 48% and 22% in acidic on plants (Azadi and Raiesi 2021; Shabbir et  al. 2021). and alkaline soils, respectively. Lower N O emissions Biochar has been reported to mitigate the potential pres- sures of the co-occurrence of toxic metal contamination Wu  et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 11 of 21 and salinity (Azadi and Raiesi 2021; Shabbir et al. 2021). Toxic metals and antibiotics/antibiotic resistance The salt stress could also be alleviated by supplement - genes (ARGs) are the main contaminants in composting ing biochar with other additives. In addition, combining products (Lu et  al. 2021; Zhou et  al. 2021a). It has been biochar with compost has increased plant productivity reported that biochar amendment aerobic composting (Liang et al. 2021b). is an efficient technology for reducing ARGs abundance Drought stress has been considered a major chal- in livestock manure and sewage sludge (Fu et  al. 2021c; lenge for sustainable agricultural productivity (Man- Zhou et  al. 2021a). Qiu et  al. (2021) found that biochar soor et  al. 2021). It has been discovered that biochar reduced the total abundance of ARGs by 17.6% dur- amendment improved the retention and availability ing sewage sludge composting. The analysis revealed of soil water, which led to enhanced stomatal con- that biochar reduced the abundance of bacterial patho- ductance, photosynthetic rate, and productivity gens such as Bacteroides and Pseudomonas. It is sug- under drought stress (Fu et  al. 2021a; Kim et  al. 2021; gested that change in the bacterial community by biochar Safahani Langeroodi et  al. 2021). Biochar played a amendment dominated the reduction in the risk of ARGs positive role in nutrient supply and improved plant in manure/sludge composting (Mazhar et  al. 2021; Qiu performance in the clay soil under drought conditions et  al. 2021). Composting livestock manure or sewage (Mannan et  al. 2021). The biochar amendment could sludge with biochar has also been reported to reduce also alleviate the oxidative damage of plants induced the mobility and bioavailability of toxic metals. In sheep by drought stress (Khan et  al. 2021; Safahani Lan- manure composting, 10% biochar dose passivated copper geroodi et al. 2021). Overall, biochar is an efficient soil (Cu) and zinc (Zn) by 46.95% and 56.27%, respectively. amendment to ameliorate soil salinity/drought stress, Additionally, microbial diversity was improved, and improve soil functions, and promote plant productiv- Firmicutes was the dominant bacterial phylum in bio- ity in salt/drought-affected soil. char-based composting (Duan et  al. 2021). In similar studies, biochar amendment had a positive impact on the diversity of toxic metal-resistant bacteria and toxic met- 3.4.5 Biochar amendment in composting als (Cu, Zn, Pb, Ni, Cr, As) passivation during livestock Composting is a promising technology to convert organic manure/sewage sludge composting (Liu et  al. 2021b; waste into stable and humus-like products for use as Song et  al. 2021; Zhang et  al. 2021a). More importantly, organic fertilizer (Lu et al. 2021; Shan et al. 2021; Yin et al. reducing the bioavailability of toxic metals was responsi- 2021). Composting is a cost-effective way to manage agri - ble for lowering ARGs abundance (Qiu et al. 2021). cultural and breeding industry waste in China. However, No more than 10% biochar dose was recommended some issues such as greenhouse gases (CH, CO , and because excess biochar addition could cause severe water 4 2 N O) and odorous emissions (NH and H S), and nitro- loss and heat dissipation, thus negatively affecting the 2 3 2 gen loss during composting impede the development of composting process (Wang et  al. 2021c). Moreover, the these practices (Yin et  al. 2021; Zhou et  al. 2021c). The cost of biochar may also be a limiting factor (Wang et al. functionality of biochar as a bulking agent for compost- 2021e). ing has been proven to be a promising strategy for solv- ing the environmental trade-offs of composting. Biochar 3.4.6 Bio char as additives in anaerobic digestion as additives could enhance the aeration rate and provide Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a biological treatment main shelters for microorganisms to enhance their activ- method to convert organic wastes into renewable biogas ity, thus improving the humification process and com - and biofertilizer and to sustain waste management posting performance as well as minimizing GHGs and (Ambaye et al. 2021; Su et al. 2021). Particularly, organic odor emissions. These capabilities are mainly attributed wet wastes, including livestock manure, food waste, and to its unique properties, including porous structure, large sewage sludge, are the most commonly used wastes for SSA, and abundant functional groups (Awasthi et  al. AD. However, several key challenges persisted thor- 2021; Guo et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2021c). HHT is a criti- oughly, including low methane efficiency, operational cal parameter in assessing biochar’s function in mitigat- instability, unsatisfactory substrate degradation, and gen- ing GHGs emissions during composting (Yin et al. 2021). eration of toxic metabolic intermediates and gaseous pol- It is concluded that biochar pyrolyzed at high tempera- lutants (Zhang and Wang 2021). tures (500–900  °C) is more effective in mitigating CH Biochar has been identified as an effective additive to and N O emissions; in comparison, biochar produced at boost and improve AD performance (Qi et  al. 2021c; low temperatures (< 500 °C) has a greater effect on reduc - Shi et  al. 2021b; Sugiarto et  al. 2021a). It could sig- ing NH emissions (Yin et al. 2021). nificantly assist in shortening the lag phase of organic Wu et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 12 of 21 Fig. 6 Proposed schematic of dark fermentative hydrogen enhanced with biochar (a) (Bu et al. 2021); The anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge promoted by hydrochar and biochar (b) (Shi et al. 2021b) biodegradation, improving the production of methane volatile fatty acids)), and accelerated direct interspecies (CH ) and hydrogen (H ). Such improvement in AD electron transfer (DIET) (Ambaye et  al. 2021; Bu et  al. 4 2 process efficiency with biochar amendment could be 2021; Qi et al. 2021c). Bu et al. (2021) reported that bio- attributed to buffering capacity, adsorption of inhibi - char significantly boosted H production from pretreated tory substances (e.g., ammonia nitrogen (NH -N) and sugarcane bagasse by implementing efficient enrichment 4 Wu  et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 13 of 21 Table 2 Biochar performance in anaerobic digestion (AD) for the treatment of organic wet wastes Feedstock HTT (°C) Substrate in AD Dosage Performance References −1 Wood chip 700, 800, 900 Seed sludge 12 g L 900 °C HTT enhanced Qi et al. (2021d) specific CH production to −1 742 mL g ethanol Fenton sludge 200, 400, 600, 800 Seed sludge + feeding – 400 °C HTT increased CH Wang et al. (2021b) substrate production by 38.1% −1 Pine sawdust 650, 900 Food waste 15 g L 900 °C HTT increased Sugiarto et al. (2021a) cumulative CH produc- tion by 46.9% −1 Corn straw 300, 400, 500 Kitchen waste 10 g L 400 °C HTT enhanced CH Wang et al. (2021a) production rate by 152% −1 Enhanced accumula- Zhang et al. (2021b) Horticultural waste < 500 Seed sludge + food waste 50 g L tive CH production to −1 126.7 mL g volatile solid −1 RIce husk 550 Corn stover + chicken 10 g L Enhanced specific CH Yu et al. (2021) manure production by 18.5% Waste apple tree branch 550 Potato pulp waste + dairy 2% TS content Potato pulp waste/ Chen et al. (2021a) manure dairy manure enhanced maximum CH yield of −1 200 mL g TS Rice husk 300 Swine manure5% TS Increased accumulative Yang et al. (2021f ) waste CH yield by 23.6% −1 Waste wood pellet 800 Food waste 25 g L Enhanced the ultimate Cui et al. (2021b) accumulative CH yield by 214% −1 Corn stover 300, 400, 500 Waste activated sludge 1.0 g g 300 °C HTT increased the Shen et al. (2021) maximum CH production rate by 181.6% −1 Hickory wood chip 400, 900 Seed sludge 12 g L 900 °C HTT increased Qi et al. (2021c) specific CH production to 725 mL CH /g ethanol −1 Corn straw Hydrochar (260, 320); Waste activated sludge 10 g L Hydrochar (260 °C) Shi et al. (2021b) Biochar (500, 700) increased the CH meth- ane yield by 25.6% −1 Corn stover500, HNO -modification Food waste 10 g L Increased CH production Gao et al. (2021) 3 4 by 90% −1 Corn straw 550, nZVI-modification Sewage sludge + food 3.0 g g Increased the maximum Zhang and Wang (2021) waste CH production rate by 49.87% and colonization of functional bacteria and activating the increased DIET between syntrophic microorganisms extracellular electron transfer between functional bac- and the activity of microorganisms (Qi et al. 2021a). Bio- teria (Fig.  6a). Moreover, biochar amendment could also char could advance MPs removal in AD through direct advance the removal of key contaminants during the AD adsorption. In addition, biochar amendment could pro- treatment of organic wet wastes, such as heavy metals, mote microbial activity in AD, thus enhancing the bio- antibiotics, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), degradation of MPs (Qi et al. 2021d). Table 2 summarizes and microplastics (MPs). Biochar has been considered a the effects of biochar on AD performance. passivator to reduce the bioavailability of heavy metals The mineral contents (e.g., Fe, Ca, K, Na) present in by electrostatic adsorption, physical adsorption, compl- biochar play a crucial role in promoting C H and hydro- exation, precipitation, and redox effect in AD (Qi et  al. gen production. It was reported that the addition of 2021a). Adsorption and promotion of biodegradation leached biochar in the AD system resulted in lower C H are critical pathways for removing antibiotics with bio- and hydrogen production compared to unleached bio- char amendment in AD (Cheng et al. 2021). Biochar has char treatment (Sugiarto et  al. 2021b). The role of iron high-effective performance in promoting the biodegrada - (Fe) within biochar in boosting C H production in the tion of PAHs in AD. The enhancement was attributed to AD system was largely reported in 2021. Wang et  al. Wu et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 14 of 21 (2021b) showed that magnetite-contained biochar pre- resulting in the accumulation of toxic metabolic inter- pared from Fenton sludge pyrolyzed at 400  °C signifi - mediates that could delay methane production (Ambaye cantly improved AD performance due to magnetite’s high et al. 2021). conductivity. Fe-modified biochar could act as a catalytic medium for substrate hydrolysis and accelerating metha-4 Conclusions and perspectives nogenesis. The generated Fe oxides on the biochar sur - CiteSpace-based scientometric analysis was used to face contributed to the interspecies electron transfer in analyze the research trends and hotspots in the biochar syntrophic metabolism (Deng et  al. 2021b). Therefore, field based on 5535 publications collected from WoS introducing Fe oxides into biochar has great potential to core collection in 2021. The number of publications has improve AD performance. expanded dramatically in 2021 and the growth trend may Hydrochar has also been demonstrated to enhance AD continue. China and USA were pioneers in this field. The performance. He et  al. (2021) showed that hydrochar keyword clustering analysis indicated that “Biochar for promoted methane production rates by 36.4–237% in toxic metal immobilization”, “Biochar-based catalyst for AD of organic wastes via DIET mediated through surface biofuel production”, “Biochar for global climate change oxygen-containing functional groups. Hydrochar pre- mitigation”, “Biochar for salinity and drought stress ame- pared at lower temperatures had greater surface oxygen- lioration”, “Biochar amendment in composting”, and containing functional groups, which were related to the “Biochar as additives in anaerobic digestion” were the facilitated DIET. Similarly, Shi et  al. (2021a) found that main research trends and hotspots in biochar research hydrochar increased the methane yield and production in 2021. The employment of biochar as heterogeneous rate by 31.4% and 30.8%, respectively. Genome-centric catalysts for biofuel production became the focus of bio- metatranscriptomics analysis revealed that hydrochar char research in 2021. Biochar’s applications for heavy behaved as an electron shuttle to promote DIET between metal immobilization, global climate mitigation, salin- Syntrophomonas sp. FDU0164 and Methanosarcina sp. ity and drought stress amelioration, biofuel production, FDU0106. It should be noted that hydrochar exhibited and anaerobic digestion promotion represent sustainable a superior ability to promote methane yield and produc- growing topics in 2021. However, bioremediation using tion rate than biochar. Hydrochar had greater surface functional bacteria immobilized on biochar and biochar- oxygen-containing functional groups, which were related assisted advanced oxidation process were well-studied to facilitated DIET and enhanced methane yield and pro- but with less frequency in 2021 than in 2020. In short, the duction rate. The metabolomic analysis also showed that present review provides a comprehensive overview of the the alterations of metabolites associated with fatty acids research and the evolution of research hotspots in bio- and amino acids metabolism induced by hydrochar were char research. stronger than those of biochar (Fig. 6b) (Shi et al. 2021b). Although biochar has multifunctional applications in The addition of biochar in the anaerobic co-digestion agriculture, environment, and energy, its potential eco- of food waste or livestock manure with sewage sludge has logical risks, and long-term safety and implications are recently aroused considerable attention. It has highly syn- of great concern. Previous studies have confirmed that ergistic effects on hydrolysis acidification and methane biochar contained several toxic components, includ- production compared with digestion alone (Johnravin- ing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHs), volatile dar et  al. 2021; Liang et  al. 2021a; Zhang et  al. 2021d). organic compounds (VOCs), polychlorinated dibenzo- A recent study indicated that the anaerobic co-digestion p-dioxins (PCDDs), persistent free radicals (PFRs), toxic of pig manure with municipal sludge enhanced methane metals, and water-soluble organic compounds (WSOCs) yield by 83.0–136.5% and 31.3–68.0% at mesophilic and (Brtnicky et al. 2021; Godlewska et al. 2021). The detri - thermophilic temperatures, respectively (Zhang et  al. mental effects of these harmful substances were corre - 2021d). Notably, certain disadvantages of incompatible lated with their bioavailable fraction, which depended inoculum-to-substrate ratio, excessive acidification, and on the feedstock and preparation methods (Godlewska organic overloading may lead to the inhibition of biogas et  al. 2021; Wang et  al. 2019). PAHs are mostly formed production (Liang et al. 2021a). during the incomplete combustion of biowaste (Wang It is noted that biochar/hydrochar addition, exceed- et  al. 2017). It is suggested that biochar produced by ing a certain amount, could negatively affect AD perfor - slow pyrolysis had lower PAHs than by fast pyrolysis mance. In some cases, the negative effect was due to the (Wang et  al. 2017). Biochar produced under medium high sorption capacities of biochar, which might reduce temperatures (400–600 °C) often contained higher con- the contact between microbes and substrates. Another tents of bioavailable PAHs. In general, the majority of potential explanation is that a high dose of biochar accel- biochars contained a low bioavailable fraction of PAHs erated the hydrolysis and acidogenesis-acetogenesis, (Tomczyk et  al. 2020). PCDD/Fs are mainly formed on Wu  et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 15 of 21 the surface of biochar during the thermal treatment of contaminants are mainly originated from feedstock feedstock, especially food waste (El-Naggar et al. 2019). rich in heavy metals, especially sewage sludge, animal It is reported that low temperatures (200–400  °C) and manure, and plants grown on heavy metal-contami- short residence time favored the formation of PCDDs nated soils. The conversion of biomass abundant with on biochar surface (Lyu et  al. 2016). It is accepted heavy metals to biochar is considered a promising that PCDDs always existed in low quantities in bio- method for safely disposing of biomass and significantly char and posed a relatively marginal risk to organisms reducing the bioavailability and leaching of heavy met- (Godlewska et  al. 2021; Weidemann et  al. 2018). VOCs als (Devi and Saroha 2014; Wang et al. 2019; Zhang et al. are mainly formed on biochar surfaces or/and inside 2020). The contents of certain heavy metals increased biochar pores by the thermal decomposition of bio- with increasing HTTs, which may be attributed mainly mass. The contents of VOCs in biochar decreased with to the ‘concentration effect’ resulting from a decrease increasing HTTs (Buss et  al. 2015). Numerous stud- in biochar yield (Zhang et  al. 2020). The bioavailabil - ies have reported the stable and large molecular PFRs ity of heavy metals depends on heavy metal contents in biochar during the biomass carbonization process in raw biomass and the transformation and dissolution (Liao et al. 2014; Lieke et al. 2018; Yang et al. 2016; Zhen of heavy metals in biochar (Godlewska et al. 2021). The et al. 2021). It was found that the electron paramagnetic release of water-soluble organic compounds (WSOCs) resonance (EPR) signals in lignin-derived biochar were from hydrochar was higher than from biochar. With the higher than those in cellulose-derived biochar. The EPR increase in HTT, the contents of phenols and organic signals increased with increasing HTT for the major- acids in WSOCs increased (Hao et al. 2018). ity of biochar (Liao et  al. 2014). Besides organic com- Despite the ecologically acceptable levels of these pounds, heavy metals (e.g., Cd, Cu, and Pb) in biochar harmful substances for most biochar, it may pose an are highly concerned with their toxicity. Heavy metal ecological risk to soil biota (Fig.  7). For example, it is Fig. 7 Potential risks associated with biochar application to soils Wu et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 16 of 21 Received: 21 September 2022 Revised: 26 December 2022 Accepted: 2 revealed that the attendance of some contaminants (e.g., January 2023 PAHs, cresols, methylated phenols) in biochar might cause direct toxicity to soil microorganisms (Oleszczuk and Koltowski 2018; Yang et  al. 2019), for example, sig- nificant germination inhibition, plasma membrane dis - References ruption, and plant growth retardation (Liao et  al. 2014). Abdullah RF, Rashid U, Ibrahim ML, NolHakim MAHL, Moser BR, Alharthi FA (2021) Bifunctional biomass-based catalyst for biodiesel production via When incorporated into agricultural soils, dust emis- hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) pretreatment—synthesis, characteri- sions from biochar may cause a health hazard for farm- zation and optimization. Process Saf Environ 156:219–230. https:// doi. ers (Li et  al. 2018). The nano biochar after ball milling org/ 10. 1016/j. psep. 2021. 10. 007 Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan N, Mohan D, Vithanage M, had a higher potential ecological risk than pristine bio- Lee SS, Ok YS (2014) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management char due to its unique nanotoxicity (Huang et  al. 2021). in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19–33. https:// doi. org/ 10. Moreover, soil physicochemical changes caused by bio- 1016/j. chemo sphere. 2013. 10. 071 Ambaye TG, Rene ER, Nizami AS, Dupont C, Vaccari M, van Hullebusch ED char amendment may indirectly induce ecotoxicity to soil (2021) Beneficial role of biochar addition on the anaerobic digestion of organisms. The increase in soil pH after biochar addition food waste: a systematic and critical review of the operational param- may negatively affect earthworm reproductions (Van eters and mechanisms. J Environ Manage 290:112537. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jenvm an. 2021. 112537 Zwieten et  al. 2009). The strong adsorption of nutrients Anniwaer A, Chaihad N, Zahra ACA, Yu T, Kasai Y, Kongparakul S, Samart C, by biochar would reduce the bioavailability of nutrients, Abudula A, Guan G (2021) Steam co-gasification of Japanese cedar - thus inhibiting plant growth. Similarly, the accessibility wood and its commercial biochar for hydrogen-rich gas production. Int J Hydrogen Energ 46:34587–34598. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ijhyd ene. of water to plants would decrease due to biochar’s strong 2021. 08. 032 water retention capacity (Brtnicky et  al. 2021). It has to Arabi Z, Rinklebe J, El-Naggar A, Hou D, Sarmah AK, Moreno-Jimenez E (2021) be noted that an appropriate biochar application rate (Im)mobilization of arsenic, chromium, and nickel in soils via biochar: a meta-analysis. Environ Pollut 286:117199. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. may not have unintended adverse effects on soil organ - envpol. 2021. 117199 isms. Still, excess biochar addition is likely to generate Awasthi SK, Duan Y, Liu T, Zhou Y, Qin S, Liu H, Varjani S, Awasthi MK, Zhang Z, unintended consequences. Pandey A, Taherzadeh MJ (2021) Sequential presence of heavy metal resistant fungal communities influenced by biochar amendment in the poultry manure composting process. J Clean Prod 291:125947. https:// Supplementary Information doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jclep ro. 2021. 125947 The online version contains supplementary material available at https:// doi. Azadi N, Raiesi F (2021) Salinity-induced changes in cadmium availability affect org/ 10. 1007/ s42773- 023- 00204-2. soil microbial and biochemical functions: mitigating role of biochar. Chemosphere 274:129924. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. chemo sphere. 2021. 129924 Additional file 1. Table S1 The top 10 most productive countries in Brtnicky M, Datta R, Holatko J, Bielska L, Gusiatin ZM, Kucerik J, Hammer- biochararea in 2021. Table S2 The top 10 institutions in the field of schmiedt T, Danish S, Radziemska M, Mravcova L, Fahad S, Kintl A, biocharresearch in 2021. Fig. S1 The number of published documents on Sudoma M, Ahmed N et al (2021) A critical review of the possible biocharresearch. Fig. S2 Countries performing biochar research in 2021. adverse effects of biochar in the soil environment. Sci Total Environ 796:148756. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2021. 148756 Acknowledgements Bu J, Wei HL, Wang Y T, Cheng JR, Zhu MJ (2021) Biochar boosts dark fermenta- Not applicable. tive H2 production from sugarcane bagasse by selective enrichment/ colonization of functional bacteria and enhancing extracellular electron Author contributions transfer. Water Res 202:117440. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. watres. 2021. PW: Investigation, writing-original draft and editing, funding acquisition; BS: 117440 Writing-review and editing; HW: Review and editing; ZJ: Investigation; YW: Buss W (2021) Pyrolysis solves the issue of organic contaminants in sewage Investigation, review and editing, funding acquisition; WC: Investigation, sludge while retaining carbon—making the case for sewage sludge review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. treatment via pyrolysis. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9:10048–10053. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acssu schem eng. 1c036 51 Funding Buss W, Masek O, Graham M, Wust D (2015) Inherent organic compounds This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China in biochar—their content, composition and potential toxic effects. J (Project No. 42225701, 42007355). Environ Manage 156:150–157. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jenvm an. 2015. 03. 035 Availability of data and materials Cao Y, Shan Y, Wu P, Zhang P, Zhang Z, Zhao F, Zhu T (2021) Mitigating the All data generated during the current study are available from the correspond- global warming potential of rice paddy fields by straw and straw- ing author on reasonable request. derived biochar amendments. Geoderma 396:115081. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. geode rma. 2021. 115081 Cha JS, Park SH, Jung S-C, Ryu C, Jeon J-K, Shin M-C, Park Y-K (2016) Production Declarations and utilization of biochar: a review. J Ind Eng Chem 40:1–15. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jiec. 2016. 06. 002 Ethics approval and consent to participate Chen C (2004) Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowl- No applicable. edge domain visualization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(Suppl_1):5303– 5310. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1073/ pnas. 03075 13100 Competing interests Chen C (2017) Science mapping: a systematic review of the literature. J Data The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests Info Sci 2:1–40. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1515/ jdis- 2017- 0006 or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Wu  et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 17 of 21 Chen YD, Wang R, Duan X, Wang S, Ren NQ, Ho SH (2020) Production, proper- El-Naggar A, Chang SX, Cai Y, Lee YH, Wang J, Wang SL, Ryu C, Rinklebe J, Sik ties, and catalytic applications of sludge derived biochar for environ- Ok Y (2021) Mechanistic insights into the (im)mobilization of arsenic, mental remediation. Water Res 187:116390. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. cadmium, lead, and zinc in a multi-contaminated soil treated with watres. 2020. 116390 different biochars. Environ Int 156:106638. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. Chen M, Liu S, Yuan X, Li QX, Wang F, Xin F, Wen B (2021) Methane production envint. 2021. 106638 and characteristics of the microbial community in the co-digestion of Farhangi-Abriz S, Ghassemi-Golezani K (2021) Changes in soil properties and potato pulp waste and dairy manure amended with biochar. Renew salt tolerance of safflower in response to biochar-based metal oxide Energ 163:357–367. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. renene. 2020. 09. 006 nanocomposites of magnesium and manganese. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf Chen Z, Lu Z, Zhang Y, Li B, Chen C, Shen K (2021b) Eec ff ts of biochars com- 211:111904. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ecoenv. 2021. 111904 bined with ferrous sulfate and pig manure on the bioavailability of Cd Farkas E, Feigl V, Gruiz K, Vaszita E, Fekete-Kertesz I, Tolner M, Kerekes I, Pusztai and potential phytotoxicity for wheat in an alkaline contaminated soil. E, Kari A, Uzinger N, Rekasi M, Kirchkeszner C, Molnar M (2020) Long- Sci Total Environ 753:141832. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2020. term effects of grain husk and paper fibre sludge biochar on acidic 141832 and calcareous sandy soils—a scale-up field experiment applying a Cheng D, Ngo HH, Guo W, Chang SW, Nguyen DD, Nguyen QA, Zhang J, Liang complex monitoring toolkit. Sci Total Environ 731:138988. https:// doi. S (2021) Improving sulfonamide antibiotics removal from swine waste-org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2020. 138988 water by supplying a new pomelo peel derived biochar in an anaerobic Feng D, Guo D, Shang Q, Zhao Y, Zhang L, Guo X, Cheng J, Chang G, Guo Q, membrane bioreactor. Bioresource Technol 319:124160. https:// doi. org/ Sun S (2021a) Mechanism of biochar-gas-tar-soot formation during 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2020. 124160 pyrolysis of different biomass feedstocks: effect of inherent metal spe - Chi NTL, Anto S, Ahamed TS, Kumar SS, Shanmugam S, Samuel MS, Mathimani cies. Fuel 293:120409. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. fuel. 2021. 120409 T, Brindhadevi K, Pugazhendhi A (2021) A review on biochar production Feng D, Guo D, Zhang Y, Sun S, Zhao Y, Chang G, Guo Q, Qin Y (2021b) techniques and biochar based catalyst for biofuel production from Adsorption-enrichment characterization of CO and dynamic retention algae. Fuel 287:119411. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. fuel. 2020. 119411 of free NH in functionalized biochar with H O/NH ·H O activation 3 2 3 2 Cho S-H, Jung S, Park Y-K, Lin K-YA, Chen W-H, Tsang YF, Kwon EE (2021) Biofuel for promotion of new ammonia-based carbon capture. Chem Eng J production as an example of virtuous valorization of swine manure. 409:128193. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. cej. 2020. 128193 ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9:13761–13772. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acssu Fu G, Qiu X, Xu X, Zhang W, Zang F, Zhao C (2021a) The role of biochar particle schem eng. 1c043 82 size and application rate in promoting the hydraulic and physical Craswell ET, Chalk PM, Kaudal BB (2021) Role of 15N in tracing biologically properties of sandy desert soil. CATENA 207:105607. https:// doi. org/ 10. driven nitrogen dynamics in soils amended with biochar: a review. Soil 1016/j. catena. 2021. 105607 Biol Biochem 162:108416. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. soilb io. 2021. 108416 Fu H, Ma S, Xu S, Duan R, Cheng G, Zhao P (2021b) Hierarchically porous mag- Cui Q, Xia J, Yang H, Liu J, Shao P (2021a) Biochar and effective microorganisms netic biochar as an efficient amendment for cadmium in water and soil: promote Sesbania cannabina growth and soil quality in the coastal performance and mechanism. Chemosphere 281:130990. https:// doi. saline-alkali soil of the Yellow River Delta, China. Sci Total Environ org/ 10. 1016/j. chemo sphere. 2021. 130990 756:143801. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2020. 143801 Fu Y, Zhang A, Guo T, Zhu Y, Shao Y (2021c) Biochar and hyperthermophiles Cui Y, Mao F, Zhang J, He Y, Tong YW, Peng Y (2021b) Biochar enhanced high- as additives accelerate the removal of antibiotic resistance genes and solid mesophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste: cell viability and mobile genetic elements during composting. Materials (basel). https:// methanogenic pathways. Chemosphere 272:129863. https:// doi. org/ 10. doi. org/ 10. 3390/ ma141 85428 1016/j. chemo sphere. 2021. 129863 Gao B, Wang Y, Huang L, Liu S (2021) Study on the performance of Cuong DV, Wu PC, Chen LI, Hou CH (2021) Active MnO2/biochar composite HNO -modified biochar for enhanced medium temperature anaerobic for efficient As(III) removal: insight into the mechanisms of redox digestion of food waste. Waste Manag 135:338–346. https:// doi. org/ 10. transformation and adsorption. Water Res 188:116495. https:// doi. org/ 1016/j. wasman. 2021. 09. 020 10. 1016/j. watres. 2020. 116495 Godlewska P, Ok YS, Oleszczuk P (2021) The dark side of black gold: ecotoxico- Deng B, Yuan X, Siemann E, Wang S, Fang H, Wang B, Gao Y, Shad N, Liu X, logical aspects of biochar and biochar-amended soils. J Hazard Mater Zhang W, Guo X, Zhang L (2021) Feedstock particle size and pyrolysis 403:123833. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jhazm at. 2020. 123833 temperature regulate effects of biochar on soil nitrous oxide and Gopinath A, Divyapriya G, Srivastava V, Laiju AR, Nidheesh PV, Kumar MS (2021) carbon dioxide emissions. Waste Manag 120:33–40. https:// doi. org/ 10. Conversion of sewage sludge into biochar: a potential resource in 1016/j. wasman. 2020. 11. 015 water and wastewater treatment. Environ Res 194:110656. https:// doi. Deng Y, Xia J, Zhao R, Liu X, Xu J (2021b) Modified biochar promotes the direct org/ 10. 1016/j. envres. 2020. 110656 interspecies electron transfer between iron-reducing bacteria and Guenet B, Gabrielle B, Chenu C, Arrouays D, Balesdent J, Bernoux M, Bruni E, methanogens in high organic loading co-digestion. Bioresour Technol Caliman JP, Cardinael R, Chen S, Ciais P, Desbois D, Fouche J, Frank S et al 342:126030. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2021. 126030 (2021) Can N O emissions offset the benefits from soil organic carbon Devi P, Saroha AK (2014) Risk analysis of pyrolyzed biochar made from paper storage? Glob Chang Biol 27:237–256. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ gcb. mill effluent treatment plant sludge for bioavailability and eco-toxicity 15342 of heavy metals. Bioresour Technol 162:308–315. https:// doi. org/ 10. Guo X-x, Wu S-b, Wang X-q, Liu H-t (2021) Impact of biochar addition on three- 1016/j. biort ech. 2014. 03. 093 dimensional structural changes in aggregates associated with humus Dong D, Li J, Ying S, Wu J, Han X, Teng Y, Zhou M, Ren Y, Jiang P (2021) Mitiga- during swine manure composting. J Clean Prod 280:124380. https:// doi. tion of methane emission in a rice paddy field amended with biochar-org/ 10. 1016/j. jclep ro. 2020. 124380 based slow-release fertilizer. Sci Total Environ 792:148460. https:// doi. Hagemann N, Joseph S, Schmidt HP, Kammann CI, Harter J, Borch T, Young RB, org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2021. 148460 Varga K, Taherymoosavi S, Elliott KW, McKenna A, Albu M, Mayrhofer Duan Y, Yang J, Guo Y, Wu X, Tian Y, Li H, Awasthi MK (2021) Pollution control C, Obst M et al (2017) Organic coating on biochar explains its nutrient in biochar-driven clean composting: emphasize on heavy metal pas- retention and stimulation of soil fertility. Nat Commun 8:1089. https:// sivation and gaseous emissions mitigation. J Hazard Mater 420:126635. doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41467- 017- 01123-0 https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jhazm at. 2021. 126635 Hao S, Zhu X, Liu Y, Qian F, Fang Z, Shi Q, Zhang S, Chen J, Ren ZJ (2018) Dutta S, He M, Xiong X, Tsang DCW (2021) Sustainable management and recy- Production temperature effects on the structure of hydrochar-derived cling of food waste anaerobic digestate: a review. Bioresour Technol dissolved organic matter and associated toxicity. Environ Sci Technol 341:125915. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2021. 125915 52:7486–7495. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acs. est. 7b049 83 El-Naggar A, El-Naggar AH, Shaheen SM, Sarkar B, Chang SX, Tsang DCW, Rin- He J, Ren S, Zhang S, Luo G (2021) Modification of hydrochar increased klebe J, Ok YS (2019) Biochar composition-dependent impacts on soil the capacity to promote anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technol nutrient release, carbon mineralization, and potential environmental 341:125856. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2021. 125856 risk: a review. J Environ Manage 241:458–467. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. Hsu CJ, Cheng YH, Huang YP, Atkinson JD, Hsi HC (2021) A novel synthesis of jenvm an. 2019. 02. 044 sulfurized magnetic biochar for aqueous Hg(II) capture as a potential Wu et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 18 of 21 method for environmental remediation in water. Sci Total Environ Liang J, Luo L, Li D, Varjani S, Xu Y, Wong JWC (2021a) Promoting anaerobic 784:147240. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2021. 147240 co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste with different types of Hu Z, Miao Z, Chen H, Wu J, Wu W, Ren Y, Jiang E (2021) Chemical looping gasi- conductive materials: performance, stability, and underlying mecha- fication of biochar to produce hydrogen-rich syngas using Fe/Ca-based nism. Bioresour Technol 337:125384. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. oxygen carrier prepared by coprecipitation. J Energy Inst 94:157–166. 2021. 125384 https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. joei. 2020. 12. 006 Liang JF, Li QW, Gao JQ, Feng JG, Zhang XY, Hao YJ, Yu FH (2021b) Biochar- Hu J, Jia Z, Zhao S, Wang W, Zhang Q, Liu R, Huang Z (2021a) Activated char compost addition benefits Phragmites australis growth and soil prop - supported Fe–Ni catalyst for syngas production from catalytic gasifica- erty in coastal wetlands. Sci Total Environ 769:145166. https:// doi. org/ tion of pine wood. Bioresour Technol 340:125600. https:// doi. org/ 10. 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2021. 145166 1016/j. biort ech. 2021. 125600 Liang JF, Li QW, Gao JQ, Feng JG, Zhang XY, Wu YQ, Yu FH (2021c) Biochar Huang XC, Zhu SS, Zhang HL, Huang YC, Wang XD, Wang Y, Chen D (2021) rhizosphere addition promoted Phragmites australis growth and Biochar nanoparticles induced distinct biological effects on freshwater changed soil properties in the Yellow River Delta. Sci Total Environ algae via oxidative stress, membrane damage, and nutrient depletion. 761:143291. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2020. 143291 ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9:10761–10770. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acssu Liao S, Pan B, Li H, Zhang D, Xing B (2014) Detecting free radicals in biochars schem eng. 1c018 14 and determining their ability to inhibit the germination and growth Inyang MI, Gao B, Yao Y, Xue Y, Zimmerman A, Mosa A, Pullammanappallil P, Ok of corn, wheat and rice seedlings. Environ Sci Technol 48:8581–8587. YS, Cao X (2015) A review of biochar as a low-cost adsorbent for aque-https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ es404 250a ous heavy metal removal. Crit Rev Env Sci Tec 46:406–433. https:// doi. Liao J, Hu A, Zhao Z, Liu X, Jiang C, Zhang Z (2021) Biochar with large specific org/ 10. 1080/ 10643 389. 2015. 10968 80 surface area recruits N O-reducing microbes and mitigate N O emis- 2 2 Islam MS, Kwak JH, Nzediegwu C, Wang S, Palansuriya K, Kwon EE, Naeth MA, sion. Soil Biol Biochem 156:108212. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. soilb io. El-Din MG, Ok YS, Chang SX (2021) Biochar heavy metal removal in 2021. 108212 aqueous solution depends on feedstock type and pyrolysis purging Lieke T, Zhang XC, Steinberg CEW, Pan B (2018) Overlooked risks of biochars: gas. Environ Pollut 281:117094. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. envpol. 2021. persistent free radicals trigger neurotoxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans. 117094 Environ Sci Technol 52:7981–7987. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acs. est. Jellali S, Khiari B, Usman M, Hamdi H, Charabi Y, Jeguirim M (2021) Sludge-8b013 38 derived biochars: a review on the influence of synthesis conditions on Liu L, Huang L, Huang R, Lin H, Wang D (2021a) Immobilization of heavy met- pollutants removal efficiency from wastewaters. Renew Sust Energ Rev als in biochar derived from co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and calcium 144:111068. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. rser. 2021. 111068 sulfate. J Hazard Mater 403:123648. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jhazm at. Jiang Z, Yang S, Pang Q, Xu Y, Chen X, Sun X, Qi S, Yu W (2021) Biochar 2020. 123648 improved soil health and mitigated greenhouse gas emission from Liu L, Ye Q, Wu Q, Liu T, Peng S (2021b) Eec ff t of biochar addition on sludge controlled irrigation paddy field: insights into microbial diversity. J aerobic composting and greenbelt utilization. Environ Technol Inno Clean Prod 318:128595. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jclep ro. 2021. 128595 21:101279. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. eti. 2020. 101279 Johnravindar D, Wong JWC, Chakraborty D, Bodedla G, Kaur G (2021) Food Liu Y, Paskevicius M, Wang H, Parkinson G, Wei J, Asif Akhtar M, Li C-Z (2021c) waste and sewage sludge co-digestion amended with different Insights into the mechanism of tar reforming using biochar as a cata- biochars: VFA kinetics, methane yield and digestate quality assessment. lyst. Fuel 296:120672. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. fuel. 2021. 120672 J Environ Manage 290:112457. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jenvm an. 2021. Low YW, Yee KF (2021) A review on lignocellulosic biomass waste into biochar- 112457 derived catalyst: current conversion techniques, sustainable applica- Kamali M, Jahaninafard D, Mostafaie A, Davarazar M, Gomes APD, Tarelho LAC, tions and challenges. Biomass Bioenerg 154:106245. https:// doi. org/ 10. Dewil R, Aminabhavi TM (2020) Scientometric analysis and scien-1016/j. biomb ioe. 2021. 106245 tific trends on biochar application as soil amendment. Chem Eng J Lu H, Chen XH, Mo CH, Huang YH, He MY, Li YW, Feng NX, Katsoyiannis A, Cai 395:125128. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. cej. 2020. 125128 QY (2021) Occurrence and dissipation mechanism of organic pollutants Khan Z, Khan MN, Zhang K, Luo T, Zhu K, Hu L (2021) The application of during the composting of sewage sludge: a critical review. Bioresour biochar alleviated the adverse effects of drought on the growth, physi- Technol 328:124847. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2021. 124847 ology, yield and quality of rapeseed through regulation of soil status Lyu H, He Y, Tang J, Hecker M, Liu Q, Jones PD, Codling G, Giesy JP (2016) Eec ff t and nutrients availability. Ind Crop Prod 171:113878. https:// doi. org/ 10. of pyrolysis temperature on potential toxicity of biochar if applied to 1016/j. indcr op. 2021. 113878 the environment. Environ Pollut 218:1–7. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. Kim YJ, Hyun J, Yoo SY, Yoo G (2021) The role of biochar in alleviating soil envpol. 2016. 08. 014 drought stress in urban roadside greenery. Geoderma 404:115223. Ma Q, Chen W, Jin Z, Chen L, Zhou Q, Jiang X (2021) One-step synthesis of https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. geode rma. 2021. 115223 microporous nitrogen-doped biochar for efficient removal of CO and Kostas ET, Durán-Jiménez G, Shepherd BJ, Meredith W, Stevens LA, Williams H S. Fuel 289:119932. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. fuel. 2020. 119932 OSA, Lye GJ, Robinson JP (2020) Microwave pyrolysis of olive pomace Malyan SK, Kumar SS, Fagodiya RK, Ghosh P, Kumar A, Singh R, Singh L (2021) for bio-oil and bio-char production. Chem Eng J 387:123404. https:// Biochar for environmental sustainability in the energy-water-agroeco- doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. cej. 2019. 123404 system nexus. Renew Sust Energ Rev 149:111379. https:// doi. org/ 10. Lehmann J, Cowie A, Masiello CA, Kammann C, Woolf D, Amonette JE, 1016/j. rser. 2021. 111379 Cayuela ML, Camps-Arbestain M, Whitman T (2021) Biochar in climate Mannan MA, Mia S, Halder E, Dijkstra FA (2021) Biochar application rate does change mitigation. Nat Geosci 14:883–892. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ not improve plant water availability in soybean under drought stress. s41561- 021- 00852-8 Agr Water Manage 253:106940. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. agwat. 2021. Leppäkoski L, Marttila MP, Uusitalo V, Levänen J, Halonen V, Mikkilä MH (2021) 106940 Assessing the carbon footprint of biochar from willow grown on Mansoor S, Kour N, Manhas S, Zahid S, Wani OA, Sharma V, Wijaya L, Alyemeni marginal lands in Finland. Sustainability. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ su131 MN, Alsahli AA, El-Serehy HA, Paray BA, Ahmad P (2021) Biochar as a 810097 tool for effective management of drought and heavy metal toxicity. Li C, Bair DA, Parikh SJ (2018) Estimating potential dust emissions from biochar Chemosphere 271:129458. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. chemo sphere. amended soils under simulated tillage. Sci Total Environ 625:1093–1101. 2020. 129458 https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2017. 12. 249 Manya JJ (2012) Pyrolysis for biochar purposes: a review to establish current Li Q, Long R, Chen H, Chen F, Wang J (2020) Visualized analysis of global green knowledge gaps and research needs. Environ Sci Technol 46:7939– buildings: development, barriers and future directions. J Clean Prod 7954. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ es301 029g 245:118775. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jclep ro. 2019. 118775 Mazhar SH, Li X, Rashid A, Su J, Xu J, Brejnrod AD, Su JQ, Wu Y, Zhu YG, Zhou Lian F, Xing B (2017) Black carbon (Biochar) in water/soil environments: SG, Feng R, Rensing C (2021) Co-selection of antibiotic resistance molecular structure, sorption, stability, and potential risk. Environ Sci genes, and mobile genetic elements in the presence of heavy metals Technol 51:13517–13532. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acs. est. 7b025 28 Wu  et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 19 of 21 in poultry farm environments. Sci Total Environ 755:142702. https:// doi. Shafawi AN, Mohamed AR, Lahijani P, Mohammadi M (2021) Recent advances org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2020. 142702 in developing engineered biochar for C O capture: an insight into Mazhkoo S, Dadfar H, HajiHashemi M, Pourali O (2021) A comprehensive the biochar modification approaches. J Environ Chem Eng 9:106869. experimental and modeling investigation of walnut shell gasification https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jece. 2021. 106869 process in a pilot-scale downdraft gasifier integrated with an internal Shan G, Li W, Gao Y, Tan W, Xi B (2021) Additives for reducing nitrogen loss dur- combustion engine. Energ Convers Manage 231:113836. https:// doi. ing composting: a review. J Clean Prod 307:127308. https:// doi. org/ 10. org/ 10. 1016/j. encon man. 2021. 1138361016/j. jclep ro. 2021. 127308 Nan Q, Xin L, Qin Y, Waqas M, Wu W (2021) Exploring long-term effects of Shen Y, Yu Y, Zhang Y, Urgun-Demirtas M, Yuan H, Zhu N, Dai X (2021) Role of biochar on mitigating methane emissions from paddy soil: a review. redox-active biochar with distinctive electrochemical properties to pro- Biochar 3:125–134. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s42773- 021- 00096-0 mote methane production in anaerobic digestion of waste activated Nazir MH, Ayoub M, Zahid I, Shamsuddin RB, Yusup S, Ameen M, Zulqarnain sludge. J Clean Prod 278:123212. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jclep ro. 2020. QMU (2021) Development of lignin based heterogeneous solid acid 123212 catalyst derived from sugarcane bagasse for microwave assisted- Shi Z, Campanaro S, Usman M, Treu L, Basile A, Angelidaki I, Zhang S, Luo G transesterification of waste cooking oil. Biomass Bioenerg 146:105978. (2021) Genome-centric metatranscriptomics analysis reveals the role of https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biomb ioe. 2021. 105978 hydrochar in anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. Environ Sci Nidheesh PV, Gopinath A, Ranjith N, Praveen Akre A, Sreedharan V, Suresh Technol 55:8351–8361. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acs. est. 1c019 95 Kumar M (2021) Potential role of biochar in advanced oxidation Shi Z, Usman M, He J, Chen H, Zhang S, Luo G (2021b) Combined microbial processes: a sustainable approach. Chem Eng J 405:126582. https:// doi. transcript and metabolic analysis reveals the different roles of hydro - org/ 10. 1016/j. cej. 2020. 126582 char and biochar in promoting anaerobic digestion of waste activated Oleszczuk P, Koltowski M (2018) Changes of total and freely dissolved polycy- sludge. Water Res 205:117679. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. watres. 2021. clic aromatic hydrocarbons and toxicity of biochars treated with various 117679 aging processes. Environ Pollut 237:65–73. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. Shin J, Park D, Hong S, Jeong C, Kim H, Chung W (2021) Influence of activated envpol. 2018. 01. 073 biochar pellet fertilizer application on greenhouse gas emissions and Purkayastha D, Mishra U, Biswas S (2014) A comprehensive review on Cd(II) carbon sequestration in rice (Oryza sativa L.) production. Environ Pollut removal from aqueous solution. J Water Process Eng 2:105–128. https:// 285:117457. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. envpol. 2021. 117457 doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jwpe. 2014. 05. 009 Singh G, Mavi MS, Choudhary OP, Gupta N, Singh Y (2021) Rice straw biochar Qi C, Wang R, Jia S, Chen J, Li Y, Zhang J, Li G, Luo W (2021a) Biochar amend- application to soil irrigated with saline water in a cotton-wheat system ment to advance contaminant removal in anaerobic digestion of improves crop performance and soil functionality in north-west India. organic solid wastes: a review. Bioresource Technol 341:125827. https:// J Environ Manage 295:113277. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jenvm an. 2021. doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2021. 125827 113277 Qi L, Ma Z, Chang SX, Zhou P, Huang R, Wang Y, Wang Z, Gao M (2021b) Song C, Zhao Y, Pan D, Wang S, Wu D, Wang L, Hao J, Wei Z (2021) Heavy Biochar decreases methanogenic archaea abundance and methane metals passivation driven by the interaction of organic fractions emissions in a flooded paddy soil. Sci Total Environ 752:141958. https:// and functional bacteria during biochar/montmorillonite-amended doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2020. 141958 composting. Bioresource Technol 329:124923. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. Qi Q, Sun C, Zhang J, He Y, Wah Tong Y (2021c) Internal enhancement biort ech. 2021. 124923 mechanism of biochar with graphene structure in anaerobic digestion: Su C, Tao A, Zhao L, Wang P, Wang A, Huang X, Chen M (2021) Roles of modi- the bioavailability of trace elements and potential direct interspecies fied biochar in the performance, sludge characteristics, and microbial electron transfer. Chem Eng J 406:126833. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. cej. community features of anaerobic reactor for treatment food waste. 2020. 126833 Sci Total Environ 770:144668. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2020. Qi QX, Sun C, Cristhian C, Zhang TY, Zhang JX, Tian HL, He YL, Tong YW (2021d) 144668 Enhancement of methanogenic performance by gasification biochar Sugiarto Y, Sunyoto NMS, Zhu M, Jones I, Zhang D (2021) Eec ff t of biochar in on anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technol 330:124993. https:// doi. enhancing hydrogen production by mesophilic anaerobic digestion of org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2021. 124993 food wastes: the role of minerals. Int J Hydrogen Energ 46:3695–3703. Qiu X, Zhou G, Wang H, Wu X (2021) The behavior of antibiotic-resistance https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ijhyd ene. 2020. 10. 256 genes and their relationships with the bacterial community and heavy Sugiarto Y, Sunyoto NMS, Zhu M, Jones I, Zhang D (2021a) Eec ff t of biochar metals during sewage sludge composting. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf addition on microbial community and methane production during 216:112190. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ecoenv. 2021. 112190 anaerobic digestion of food wastes: The role of minerals in biochar. Rai PK, Lee SS, Zhang M, Tsang YF, Kim KH (2019) Heavy metals in food Bioresour Technol 323:124585. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2020. crops: health risks, fate, mechanisms, and management. Environ Int 124585 125:365–385. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. envint. 2019. 01. 067 Sun R, Wang J, Peng Y, Wang H, Chen Q (2021) Mitigation of arsenic accumula- Reay DS, Davidson EA, Smith KA, Smith P, Melillo JM, Dentener F, Crutzen PJ tion in arugula (Eruca sativa Mill.) using Fe/Al/Zn impregnated biochar (2012) Global agriculture and nitrous oxide emissions. Nat Clim Change composites. Environ Sci Pollut R 28:4136–4146. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ 2:410–416. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ nclim ate14 58s11356- 020- 10476-x Ren MN, Yu XJ, Mujumdar AS, Yagoub AA, Chen L, Zhou CS (2021) Visualizing Sun H, Sun S, Feng D, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Wu J, Qin Y (2021a) Mecha- the knowledge domain of pulsed light technology in the food field: a nism of coke formation and corresponding gas fraction characteristics scientometrics review. Innov Food Sci Emerg 74:102823. https:// doi. in biochar-catalyzed tar reforming during corn straw pyrolysis. Fuel Pro- org/ 10. 1016/j. ifset. 2021. 102823 cess Technol 221:106903. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. fuproc. 2021. 106903 Reynel-Ávila HE, Camacho-Aguilar KI, Bonilla-Petriciolet A, Mendoza-Castillo DI, Sun T, Xu Y, Sun Y, Wang L, Liang X, Zheng S (2021c) Cd immobilization and soil González-Ponce HA, Trejo-Valencia R, Azevedo DCS (2021) Engineered quality under Fe-modified biochar in weakly alkaline soil. Chemosphere magnetic carbon-based adsorbents for the removal of water priority 280:130606. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. chemo sphere. 2021. 130606 pollutants: an overview. Adsorpt Sci Technol 2021:1–41. https:// doi. org/ Tian H, Yang J, Xu R, Lu C, Canadell JG, Davidson EA, Jackson RB, Arneth A, 10. 1155/ 2021/ 99174 44 Chang J, Ciais P, Gerber S, Ito A, Joos F, Lienert S et al (2019) Global soil SafahaniLangeroodi AR, Mancinelli R, Radicetti E (2021) Contribution of nitrous oxide emissions since the preindustrial era estimated by an biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to sustainable cultivation of ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models: magnitude, attribution, and sunflower under semi-arid environment. Field Crop Res 273:108292. uncertainty. Glob Chang Biol 25:640–659. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ gcb. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. fcr. 2021. 108292 14514 Shabbir A, Saqib M, Murtaza G, Abbas G, Imran M, Rizwan M, Naeem MA, Tomczyk B, Siatecka A, Gao Y, Ok YS, Bogusz A, Oleszczuk P (2020) The conver- Ali S, Rashad Javeed HM (2021) Biochar mitigates arsenic-induced tion of sewage sludge to biochar as a sustainable tool of PAHs exposure human health risks and phytotoxicity in quinoa under saline conditions reduction during agricultural utilization of sewage sludges. J Hazard by modulating ionic and oxidative stress responses. Environ Pollut Mater 392:122416. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jhazm at. 2020. 122416 287:117348. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. envpol. 2021. 117348 Wu et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 20 of 21 Tong S, Zhang S, Yin H, Wang J, Chen M (2021) Study on co-hydrothermal Wu P, Wang ZY, Bolan NS, Wang HL, Wang YJ, Chen WF (2021) Visualizing treatment combined with pyrolysis of rice straw/sewage sludge: the development trend and research frontiers of biochar in 2020: a biochar properties and heavy metals behavior. J Anal Appl Pyrol scientometric perspective. Biochar 3:419–436. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ 155:105074. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jaap. 2021. 105074s42773- 021- 00120-3 Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Morris S, Chan KY, Downie A, Rust J, Joseph S, Cowie Wu Y, Liu J, Shaaban M, Hu R (2021b) Dynamics of soil N O emissions and A (2009) Eec ff ts of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste functional gene abundance in response to biochar application in the on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant Soil 327:235–246. presence of earthworms. Environ Pollut 268:115670. https:// doi. org/ 10. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11104- 009- 0050-x1016/j. envpol. 2020. 115670 Wang C, Wang Y, Herath HMSK (2017) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) Xiao X, Chen B, Chen Z, Zhu L, Schnoor JL (2018) Insight into multiple and in biochar—their formation, occurrence and analysis: a review. Org multilevel structures of biochars and their potential environmental Geochem 114:1–11. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. orgge ochem. 2017. 09. 001 applications: a critical review. Environ Sci Technol 52:5027–5047. Wang X, Li C, Li Z, Yu G, Wang Y (2019) Eec ff t of pyrolysis temperature on https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acs. est. 7b064 87 characteristics, chemical speciation and risk evaluation of heavy metals Xiong Q, Wu X, Lv H, Liu S, Hou H, Wu X (2021) Influence of rice husk addition in biochar derived from textile dyeing sludge. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf on phosphorus fractions and heavy metals risk of biochar derived from 168:45–52. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ecoenv. 2018. 10. 022 sewage sludge. Chemosphere 280:130566. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. Wang J, Zhao Z, Zhang Y (2021a) Enhancing anaerobic digestion of kitchen chemo sphere. 2021. 130566 wastes with biochar: link between different properties and critical Xu Z, He M, Xu X, Cao X, Tsang DCW (2021) Impacts of different activation mechanisms of promoting interspecies electron transfer. Renew Energ processes on the carbon stability of biochar for oxidation resistance. 167:791–799. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. renene. 2020. 11. 153 Bioresour Technol 338:125555. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2021. Wang M, Zhao Z, Zhang Y (2021b) Magnetite-contained biochar derived 125555 from fenton sludge modulated electron transfer of microorganisms Yang J, Pan B, Li H, Liao SH, Zhang D, Wu M, Xing BS (2016) Degradation of in anaerobic digestion. J Hazard Mater 403:123972. https:// doi. org/ 10. p-Nitrophenol on biochars: role of persistent free radicals. Environ Sci 1016/j. jhazm at. 2020. 123972 Technol 50:694–700. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acs. est. 5b040 42 Wang SP, Wang L, Sun ZY, Wang ST, Shen CH, Tang YQ, Kida K (2021c) Biochar Yang X, Ng W, Wong BSE, Baeg GH, Wang CH, Ok YS (2019) Characterization addition reduces nitrogen loss and accelerates composting process by and ecotoxicological investigation of biochar produced via slow pyroly- affecting the core microbial community during distilled grain waste sis: effect of feedstock composition and pyrolysis conditions. J Hazard composting. Bioresour Technol 337:125492. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. Mater 365:178–185. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jhazm at. 2018. 10. 047 biort ech. 2021. 125492 Yang Q, Zhou H, Bartocci P, Fantozzi F, Masek O, Agblevor FA, Wei Z, Yang Wang X, Chang VW, Li Z, Chen Z, Wang Y (2021d) Co-pyrolysis of sewage H, Chen H, Lu X, Chen G, Zheng C, Nielsen CP, McElroy MB (2021) sludge and organic fractions of municipal solid waste: synergistic Prospective contributions of biomass pyrolysis to China’s 2050 carbon effects on biochar properties and the environmental risk of heavy reduction and renewable energy goals. Nat Commun 12:1698. https:// metals. J Hazard Mater 412:125200. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jhazm at. doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41467- 021- 21868-z 2021. 125200 Yang D, Yang S, Wang L, Xu J, Liu X (2021a) Performance of biochar-supported Wang Y, Akdeniz N, Yi S (2021e) Biochar-amended poultry mortality compost- nanoscale zero-valent iron for cadmium and arsenic co-contaminated ing to increase compost temperatures, reduce ammonia emissions, soil remediation: insights on availability, bioaccumulation and health and decrease leachate’s chemical oxygen demand. Agr Ecosyst Environ risk. Environ Pollut 290:118054. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. envpol. 2021. 315:107451. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. agee. 2021. 107451 118054 Wang Z, Shen R, Ji S, Xie L, Zhang H (2021f ) Eec ff ts of biochar derived from Yang D, Yang S, Yuan H, Wang F, Wang H, Xu J, Liu X (2021b) Co-benefits of sewage sludge and sewage sludge/cotton stalks on the immobiliza- biochar-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron in simultaneously sta- tion and phytoavailability of Pb, Cu, and Zn in sandy loam soil. J Hazard bilizing soil heavy metals and reducing their bioaccessibility. J Hazard Mater 419:126468. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jhazm at. 2021. 126468 Mater 418:126292. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jhazm at. 2021. 126292 Wang Z, Tian Q, Guo J, Wu R, Zhu H, Zhang H (2021g) Co-pyrolysis of sewage Yang F, Du Q, Sui L, Cheng K (2021c) One-step fabrication of artificial humic sludge/cotton stalks with K CO for biochar production: improved acid-functionalized colloid-like magnetic biochar for rapid heavy metal 2 3 biochar porosity and reduced heavy metal leaching. Waste Manag removal. Bioresour Technol 328:124825. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort 135:199–207. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. wasman. 2021. 08. 042ech. 2021. 124825 Weidemann E, Buss W, Edo M, Masek O, Jansson S (2018) Influence of Yang Q, Mašek O, Zhao L, Nan H, Yu S, Yin J, Li Z, Cao X (2021d) Country-level pyrolysis temperature and production unit on formation of selected potential of carbon sequestration and environmental benefits by utiliz- PAHs, oxy-PAHs, N-PACs, PCDDs, and PCDFs in biochar—a screening ing crop residues for biochar implementation. Appl Energ 282:116275. study. Environ Sci Pollut R 25:3933–3940. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. apene rgy. 2020. 116275 s11356- 017- 0612-z Yang S, Chen Z, Wen Q (2021f ) Impacts of biochar on anaerobic digestion Wen E, Yang X, Chen H, Shaheen SM, Sarkar B, Xu S, Song H, Liang Y, Rinklebe of swine manure: methanogenesis and antibiotic resistance genes J, Hou D, Li Y, Wu F, Pohorely M, Wong JWC et al (2021) Iron-modified dissemination. Bioresour Technol 324:124679. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biochar and water management regime-induced changes in plant biort ech. 2021. 124679 growth, enzyme activities, and phytoavailability of arsenic, cadmium Yang T, Xu Y, Huang Q, Sun Y, Liang X, Wang L, Qin X, Zhao L (2021g) An and lead in a paddy soil. J Hazard Mater 407:124344. https:// doi. org/ 10. efficient biochar synthesized by iron-zinc modified corn straw for simul- 1016/j. jhazm at. 2020. 124344 taneously immobilization Cd in acidic and alkaline soils. Environ Pollut Woolf D, Amonette JE, Street-Perrott FA, Lehmann J, Joseph S (2010) Sustain- 291:118129. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. envpol. 2021. 118129 able biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nat Commun. https:// Yang Z, Sun T, Kleindienst S, Straub D, Kretzschmar R, Angenent LT, Kappler A doi. org/ 10. 1038/ ncomm s1053 (2021h) A coupled function of biochar as geobattery and geoconduc- Woolf D, Lehmann J, Ogle S, Kishimoto-Mo AW, McConkey B, Baldock J (2021) tor leads to stimulation of microbial Fe(III) reduction and methanogen- Greenhouse gas inventory model for biochar additions to soil. Environ esis in a paddy soil enrichment culture. Soil Biol Biochem 163:108446. Sci Technol 55:14795–14805. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acs. est. 1c024 25https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. soilb io. 2021. 108446 Wu P, Ata-Ul-Karim ST, Singh BP, Wang HL, Wu TL, Liu C, Fang GD, Zhou DM, Yin Y, Yang C, Li M, Zheng Y, Ge C, Gu J, Li H, Duan M, Wang X, Chen R (2021) Wang YJ, Chen WF (2019) A scientometric review of biochar research Research progress and prospects for using biochar to mitigate green- in the past 20 years (1998–2018). Biochar 1:23–43. https:// doi. org/ 10. house gas emissions during composting: a review. Sci Total Environ 1007/ s42773- 019- 00002-9 798:149294. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2021. 149294 Wu P, Wang Z, Wang H, Bolan NS, Wang Y, Chen W (2020) Visualizing the Yu Q, Sun C, Liu R, Yellezuome D, Zhu X, Bai R, Liu M, Sun M (2021) Anaerobic emerging trends of biochar research and applications in 2019: a sci- co-digestion of corn stover and chicken manure using continuous entometric analysis and review. Biochar 2:135–150. https:// doi. org/ 10. stirred tank reactor: the effect of biochar addition and urea pretreat - 1007/ s42773- 020- 00055-1 ment. Bioresour Technol 319:124197. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2020. 124197 Wu  et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 21 of 21 Yuan D, Yuan H, He X, Hu H, Qin S, Clough T, Wrage-Mönnig N, Luo J, He X, biochar-supported zerovalent iron. Chemosphere 263:127871. https:// Chen M, Zhou S (2021) Identification and verification of key func-doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. chemo sphere. 2020. 127871 tional groups of biochar influencing soil N O emission. Biol Fert Soils Zhou S, Wen X, Cao Z, Cheng R, Qian Y, Mi J, Wang Y, Liao X, Ma B, Zou Y, Wu 57:447–456. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00374- 021- 01541-9 Y (2021c) Modified cornstalk biochar can reduce ammonia emis- Zailan Z, Tahir M, Jusoh M, Zakaria ZY (2021) A review of sulfonic group bear- sions from compost by increasing the number of ammonia-oxidizing ing porous carbon catalyst for biodiesel production. Renew Energ bacteria and decreasing urease activity. Bioresour Technol 319:124120. 175:430–452. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. renene. 2021. 05. 030https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2020. 124120 Zhang M, Wang Y (2021) Impact of biochar supported nano zero-valent iron Zhou Z, Li Z, Zhang Z, You L, Xu L, Huang H, Wang X, Gao Y, Cui X (2021d) on anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste: methane Treatment of the saline-alkali soil with acidic corn stalk biochar and its production, performance stability and microbial community structure. effect on the sorghum yield in western Songnen Plain. Sci Total Environ Bioresour Technol 340:125715. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2021. 797:149190. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2021. 149190 125715 Zhu H, Yang J, Yao R, Wang X, Xie W, Zhu W, Liu X, Cao Y, Tao J (2020) Interac- Zhang P, Zhang X, Li Y, Han L (2020) Influence of pyrolysis temperature tive effects of soil amendments (biochar and gypsum) and salinity on chemical speciation, leaching ability, and environmental risk of on ammonia volatilization in coastal saline soil. CATENA 190:104527. heavy metals in biochar derived from cow manure. Bioresour Technol https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. catena. 2020. 104527 302:122850. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2020. 122850 Zhuang M, Wang H, Qi L, Cui L, Quan G, Yan J (2021) Production of activated Zhang F, Wei Z, Wang JJ (2021a) Integrated application effects of biochar biochar via a self-blowing strategy-supported sulfidated nanoscale and plant residue on ammonia loss, heavy metal immobilization, and zerovalent iron with enhanced reactivity and stability for Cr( VI) reduc- estrogen dissipation during the composting of poultry manure. Waste tion. J Clean Prod 315:128108. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jclep ro. 2021. Manag 131:117–125. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. wasman. 2021. 05. 037 128108 Zhang J, Cui Y, Zhang T, Hu Q, Wah Tong Y, He Y, Dai Y, Wang CH, Peng Y (2021b) Food waste treating by biochar-assisted high-solid anaerobic digestion coupled with steam gasification: enhanced bioenergy gen- eration and porous biochar production. Bioresour Technol 331:125051. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2021. 125051 Zhang Q, Wu Z, Zhang X, Duan P, Shen H, Gunina A, Yan X, Xiong Z (2021c) Biochar amendment mitigated N O emissions from paddy field during the wheat growing season. Environ Pollut 281:117026. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. envpol. 2021. 117026 Zhang Q, Zeng L, Fu X, Pan F, Shi X, Wang T (2021d) Comparison of anaero- bic co-digestion of pig manure and sludge at different mixing ratios at thermophilic and mesophilic temperatures. Bioresour Technol 337:125425. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2021. 125425 Zhang Q, Zhang X, Duan P, Jiang X, Shen H, Yan X, Xiong Z (2021e) The effect of long-term biochar amendment on N2O emissions: experiments with N(15)-O(18) isotopes combined with specific inhibition approaches. Sci Total Environ 769:144533. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2020. Zhang X, Xie H, Liu X, Kong D, Zhang S, Wang C (2021f ) A novel green substrate made by sludge digestate and its biochar: plant growth and greenhouse emission. Sci Total Environ 797:149194. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2021. 149194 Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Chen Y (2021g) Biochar mitigates N O emission of microbial denitrification through modulating carbon metabolism and allocation of reducing power. Environ Sci Technol 55:8068–8078. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acs. est. 1c019 76 Zhang X, Yang X, Yuan X, Tian S, Wang X, Zhang H, Han L (2022) Eec ff t of pyrolysis temperature on composition, carbon fraction and abiotic stability of straw biochars: correlation and quantitative analysis. Carbon Res 1:00017. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s44246- 022- 00017-1 Zhao Q, Wang Y, Xu Z, Yu Z (2021) How does biochar amendment affect soil methane oxidation? A review. J Soil Sediment 21:1575–1586. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11368- 021- 02889-z Zhao Q, Xu T, Song X, Nie S, Choi SE, Si C (2021b) Preparation and application in water treatment of magnetic biochar. Front Bioeng Biotech 9:769667. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3389/ fbioe. 2021. 769667 Zhao Z, Cao Y, Li S, Zhang Y (2021c) Eec ff ts of biowaste-derived biochar on the electron transport efficiency during anaerobic acid orange 7 removal. Bioresour Technol 320:124295. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2020. Zhen Y, Zhu S, Sun Z, Tian Y, Li Z, Yang C, Ma J (2021) Identifying the persistent free radicals (PFRs) formed as crucial metastable intermediates during peroxymonosulfate (PMS) activation by N-Doped carbonaceous materi- als. Environ Sci Technol 55:9293–9304. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acs. est. 1c019 74 Zhou G, Qiu X, Wu X, Lu S (2021a) Horizontal gene transfer is a key determi- nant of antibiotic resistance genes profiles during chicken manure composting with the addition of biochar and zeolite. J Hazard Mater 408:124883. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jhazm at. 2020. 124883 Zhou M, Yang X, Sun R, Wang X, Yin W, Wang S, Wang J (2021b) The contribu- tion of lignocellulosic constituents to Cr( VI) reduction capacity of http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Biochar Springer Journals

Bibliometric analysis of biochar research in 2021: a critical review for development, hotspots and trend directions

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/bibliometric-analysis-of-biochar-research-in-2021-a-critical-review-rFL3Jc2PP5
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2023
ISSN
2524-7972
eISSN
2524-7867
DOI
10.1007/s42773-023-00204-2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

1 Introduction organisms (Woolf et  al. 2010; Wu et  al. 2021a). Many Biochar is a pyrogenic carbon-rich material formed processes can be used to produce biochar such as slow through the thermal decomposition of biomass feed- and fast pyrolysis, microwave-assisted pyrolysis, hydro- stock under an oxygen-limited condition (Hagemann thermal carbonization, gasification, flash carboniza - et  al. 2017; Inyang et  al. 2015; Woolf et  al. 2021). It tion, and torrefaction (Kostas et  al. 2020; Wu et  al. has been established that different biomass materials 2020; Wu et  al. 2021a; Xiao et  al. 2018) (Fig.  1). Slow have been utilized to produce biochar which entails pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization are the most agricultural waste, forestry waste, garden waste, food frequently used methods for the preparation of bio- waste, livestock manure, sewage sludge, and aquatic char (Dutta et  al. 2021; Lian and Xing 2017). Biochar Wu  et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 3 of 21 is a heterogeneous mixture containing both amorphous Meanwhile, the improvement in soil functions after less-carbonized fractions and microcrystalline graph- biochar application is beneficial to alleviate the salinity ite-like aromatic structures. It has special properties, and drought stress on plants (Mansoor et  al. 2021; Zhu such as highly developed porosity, high specific surface et  al. 2020). Finally, the multifunctional characteristic of area (SSA), abundant surface functional groups, and biochar makes it an effective material for environmental high content of mineral components. Biochar proper- pollution (Ahmad et al. 2014; Nidheesh et al. 2021). The ties are mainly regulated by feedstock composition and biochar’s multiple functions are connected to its physico- preparation procedures (Ahmad et  al. 2014; Cha et  al. chemical properties (Manya 2012; Zhang et  al. 2021g). 2016; Lian and Xing 2017). Considering the striking heterogeneity in physicochemi- Biochar has received increasing attention for its poten- cal properties of biochar, an in-depth understanding of tial benefits in carbon sequestration, climate change miti - the developments of biochar regarding its multifunc- gation, waste management, bioenergy production, soil tional applications is urgently required. improvement, and pollution control due to its unique Although several meta-analyses and review studies properties (Nidheesh et  al. 2021; Xiao et  al. 2018; Yang have been carried out to evaluate biochar’s multifunc- et  al. 2021e). Biochar has a high recalcitrant carbon (C) tional applications systematically, very few have investi- content and the strong adsorption capacity to carbon gated current trends and scientific developments in this dioxide (CO ). Its sustainable production and field appli - field. A conclusive study was performed here and could cations enable its great potential for long-term carbon help us to identify the main subject fields, the current storage and carbon emission reduction, thereby mitigat- research frontiers, and hotspots of biochar research ing climate change (Feng et  al. 2021b; Yang et  al. 2021e; (Wu et al. 2019; Wu et al. 2021a). Because new biochar Zhang et al. 2022). The conversion of biowaste, especially applications emerge, the main signs of progress and sewage sludge, into biochar through pyrolysis provides insights associated with this field will change over time. an alternative and promising way of managing waste bio- Additionally, the unintended consequences of biochar mass (Chen et al. 2020). The produced biochar can act as application are likely to emerge after long-term bio- a catalyst for bioenergy production (Malyan et al. 2021). char application. Therefore, it is necessary to provide Again, biochar positively affects plant productivity and an analytical overview of the main signs of progress and crop yields by improving soil quality and fertility levels insights into biochar research in 2021. (Farkas et al. 2020). Fig. 1 Biochar production and modification. Modified from Wu et al. (2020) Wu et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 4 of 21 Bibliometric analysis proceeded by Citespace software sharply, and this growth trend will continue, which indi- has gained rising interest in many fields due to its math - cates the huge and increasing attention as well as the ematical statistics and visual analytic functions (Chen increased amount of scientific knowledge of biochar 2004, 2017; Ren et al. 2021). It is believed to be an effec - research. tive tool for quantitatively evaluating a given field’s cur - rent situation and emerging trends (Kamali et  al. 2020). 3.2 Contributing country analysis In this study, a combined bibliometric analysis and criti- As can be realized from Additional file  1: Fig. S2 and cal appraisal of the related documents were utilized to Table  S1, China is the highest contributing country, quantitatively identify the research status and trend of accounting for 43.99% of the total publications. This is biochar in 2021. The aims of this review are to: (1) ana - most likely because China is a great agricultural country lyze the primary authors, countries, and keyword fre- with a large population, where agriculture occupies a sig- quency and hotspot trend of the publications; (2) identify nificant and strategic position in the national economy. the current trends and hot topics in the biochar field; (3) China was followed by the USA, with 504 publications, provide perspectives on full-scale applications of biochar. accounting for 9.11%. Besides China and USA, India, Paki- stan, South Korea, Australia, Canada, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, 2 Methods and Germany also have many scientific documents. Many 2.1 Literature search connections between countries indicate robust global A systematic literature search was conducted from the cooperation and communication in this field. Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection database using the keyword of "Biochar" in the title, keywords, and 3.3 Research institution analysis abstract (Ren et  al. 2021). A total of 5533 documents The top 10 institutions with the most publications in the were collected from the database in 2021. To guarantee field of biochar research are summarized in Additional the validity of data collected, the synonyms associated file  1: Table  S2. Chinese Academy of Sciences published with biochar research, such as “Cadmium” and “Cd”, “car- the largest number of papers in this field, followed by the bon dioxide” and “CO ”, “anaerobic digestion” and “AD”, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences and Zhejiang “nanoscale zero-valent iron” and “nZVI”, and “polycy- University. The Chinese Academy of Sciences is expected clic aromatic hydrocarbon” and “PAHs” were manually to be the leading institution in many fields. It can also be merged. found that 8 institutions were from China among the top 10 productive institutions. 2.2 S cientometrics analysis tools Cite-space is a new statistical analysis tool widely used 3.4 Keyword analysis for bibliometric analysis and visualization (Li et al. 2020; 3.4.1 Bio char for toxic metal immobilization Ren et al. 2021). It is a Java-based software first developed Biochar utilized for immobilizing toxic metals has caused by Professor Chaomei Chen and his team in 2004 (Chen the interest of researchers in 2021 (Fig.  2). Keyword co- 2004). Relevant documents were exported from the occurrence analysis suggested that the most studied toxic “marked list” (with “plain text” format) of WoS Core Col- metal was Cd (Table  1). Such heightened research inter lection and then inserted in Cite-space (5.3.R4) to ana- est in Cd was due to its being highly toxic and carcino- lyze their specific characteristics. The visual analysis of genic even at low concentrations (Purkayastha et al. 2014; cooperation networks of authors, contributing countries, Rai et al. 2019). institutions, categories, and keywords helps to reveal the The transformation of sewage sludge to biochar via clustering, knowledge structure, and emerging trends of pyrolysis provides a feasible approach for the safe dis biochar research. In the co-occurrence network maps, posal of the sludge (Buss 2021; Zhang et  al. 2021f ). The each node corresponds to one item (e.g., author, institu- sewage sludge-derived biochar had a much lower leach- tion, keyword), and lines link the nodes. The higher the ing potential of heavy metals than the sewage sludge itself node’s frequency, the larger the node’s size. The thickness (Wang et al. 2021d; Xiong et al. 2021). Recently, co-pyrol- of the line indicates the cooperation degree between the ysis of sewage sludge and waste biomass (e.g., rice straw, two nodes. rice husk, cotton stalk, and sawdust) has been proven to improve the porous structure and reduce the leaching 3 Results and discussion toxicity of heavy metals in sewage sludge-derived biochar 3.1 P ublications about biochar research (Tong et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2021d, 2021f, 2021g; Xiong A total of 5533 documents were extracted from WoS et al. 2021). Another study also reported that co-pyrolysis Core Collection in 2021 (Additional file  1: Fig. S1). It can of sewage sludge and calcium sulfate was conducive to be seen that the annual number of publications increased Wu  et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 5 of 21 Fig. 2 Keyword co-occurrence map of biochar research in 2021 Table 1 The top 20 keywords related to biochar research in 2021 shown promising results. The abundant mineral constitu - ents in sewage sludge-derived biochar, such as Si, Al, Fe, Rank Keyword Frequency and Ca, greatly participated in cationic metal removal via 1 Biochar 2774 cation exchange, complexation, and precipitation (Gopi- 2 Adsorption 1064 nath et al. 2021; Islam et al. 2021; Jellali et al. 2021). 3 Removal 716 Engineered biochar has gained much attention in terms 4 Pyrolysis 668 of immobilizing toxic metals in 2021. Modification may 5 Heavy metal 605 improve the carbon content, SSA, porous structure, 6 Aqueous solution 573 functional groups, and stability of biochar. Recently, 7 Bioma 545 metal oxides and salts have been widely used for biochar 8 Carbon 486 modification. Magnetic or metal-based biochar syn - 9 Activated carbon 484 thesized by using the transition metals (e.g., Fe, Co, Ni) 10 Sorption 449 and their oxides (e.g., F e O and Fe O ) with waste bio- 2 3 3 4 11 Water 448 mass exhibits advantages over pristine biochar in heavy 12 Soil 439 metal immobilization. For instance, a novel functional 13 Mechanism 419 colloid-like magnetic biochar with high dispersibility 14 Waste 327 synthesized via impregnation of Fe(II)/Fe(III)/artificial 15 Cadmium 325 humic acid onto corn stalk-derived biochar followed by 16 Pyrolysis temperature 312 torrefaction activation exhibited superior removal per- 17 Performance 311 formance for Cd (the maximum adsorption capacity of −1 18 Sewage sludge 303170 mg  g ) (Yang et al. 2021c). The removal mechanisms 19 Waste water 297 included ion exchange, Cd–π interaction, complexation, 20 Temperature 294 and precipitation (Fig.  3a). Hierarchically porous mag- netic biochar produced from K FeO pre-treated wheat 2 4 −1 straw at 700 °C effectively removed Cd by 80 mg  g (Fu immobilizing heavy metals in sewage sludge-derived bio- et  al. 2021b). The pre- and post-heat treatment modi - char (Liu et al. 2021a). The application of sewage sludge- fication with Fe could produce Fe-loaded biochar with derived biochar as a sorbent for toxic metal removal has different properties. Generally, the Fe pre-modification Wu et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 6 of 21 Fig. 3 Possible pathways for the removal of toxic metals by biochar. Cd removal mechanisms by functional colloid-like magnetic biochar (a) (Yang et al. 2021c); Hg(II) removal mechanisms by sulfurized magnetic biochar (b) (Hsu et al. 2021); As(III) removal mechanisms by M nO -biochar composite (c) (Cuong et al. 2021) Wu  et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 7 of 21 loaded greater Fe O micro-/nanoparticles on biochar Although most of the positive results are achieved for 3 4 and achieved greater surface area, while the Fe post- acidic heavy metal-contaminated soil amended with bio- modification enriched oxygen-containing functional char, there needs to be more research on the remediation groups on biochar (Reynel-Ávila et  al. 2021; Zhao et  al. effect of biochar on alkaline heavy metal-contaminated 2021b). Hsu et al. (2021) synthesized sulfurized magnetic soil. Previous studies showed that conventional biochar biochar via a single heating step. The product had high showed no significant remediation effect in alkaline soil. adsorption for Hg(II) (the maximum adsorption capacity Meanwhile, biochar amendment might reduce soil fertil- −1 of 8.93 mg  g ), and C-S functional groups were the vital ity and cause soil alkalization. Fe- and Fe/Zn-modified adsorptive sites for Hg(II) (Fig. 3b). biochar application promoted the transformation of For metal anions (mainly As and Cr), biochar-based exchangeable Cd into oxidizable and residual Cd (Sun composites are effective sorbents for Cr and As. An et  al. 2021c; Yang et  al. 2021g). Moreover, Fe-modified active MnO -biochar composite was prepared to enhance biochar increased the richness and diversity of bacterial As(III) removal from the aqueous solution. The removal communities in the alkaline contaminated soil (Sun et al. mechanisms involved partial As(III) adsorption and the 2021c). The combination of biochar with ferrous sulfate oxidation of As(III) to As(V) by MnO . The generated and pig manure is also reported to effectively immobilize As(V) could be removed by forming MnHAsO4⋅H2O Cd and reduce Cd uptake by wheat in the alkaline con- precipitation with Mn(II), complexation with Mn-OH taminated soil (Chen et al. 2021b). groups on the MnO surface, and O-containing func- tional groups on the biochar surface (Fig.  3c) (Cuong 3.4.2 Bio char‑based catalyst for biofuel production et  al. 2021). Nano zero-valent iron (nZVI) modified The employment of biochar as heterogeneous catalysts biochar has been proven to be a promising remediation for biofuel production gained much attention in 2021. material for Cr removal (Zhou et al. 2021b; Zhuang et al. Biochar-based catalyst possesses sustainable feedstock 2021). For instance, Zhuang et  al. (2021) synthesized availability, abundant surface functional groups and inor- sulfidated nZVI-supported biochar for Cr(VI) removal. ganic species, a hierarchical and well-developed porous The porous structure of biochar and sulfidated nZVI structure, and tunable surface functionality (Chi et  al. dispersed on biochar surface could provide adsorption 2021; Low and Yee 2021). sites for Cr(VI). Then, Fe and generated Fe(II) acted as Using biochar-based heterogeneous catalysts for bio- electron donors to reduce Cr(VI). The generated Cr(III) diesel production is still a great research hotspot in 2021. would form co-precipitation with Fe(III) and be removed The presence of biochar-based catalyst promoted the from the aqueous solution. transesterification or esterification of waste cooking oil, The employment of biochar in reducing the bio - vegetable oil, animal oil, or fats (Chi et al. 2021; Cho et al. availability and phytotoxicity of toxic metals in soil has 2021; Low and Yee 2021). Swine manure-derived biochar attracted growing interest. However, pristine biochar has could act as an alkaline catalyst for the transesterification a limited effect on the remediation of toxic metal-con - lipid fraction extracted from the swine manure (Fig.  4a). taminated soils (Arabi et al. 2021; El-Naggar et al. 2021). A high yield of biodiesel (≥ 94%) was achieved with the It was found that biochar, especially rice straw-derived application of the catalyst (Cho et al. 2021). A maximum biochar application contributed to the reduction of As(V) biodiesel yield of 96.4% was obtained with methanol: oil to As(III), which increased the potential mobility of As ratio of 9:1 at 70  °C for 2  h using K CO + Cu(NO ) - 2 3 3 2 in soils (El-Naggar et al. 2021). Heat treatment tempera- treated hydrochar-derived catalyst (Fig.  4b) (Abdullah ture (HTT) is a predominant parameter influencing As et  al. 2021). Likewise, Nazir et  al. (2021) obtained a bio- mobility in soil. A meta-analysis indicated that biochar diesel yield of 89.19% at 60 °C for 15 min in the transes- produced under low HTT (≤ 450  °C) did not affect As terification of oil with methanol at a molar ratio of 1:18, mobility in soil, but high-temperature biochar (> 450 °C) catalyzed by H SO -modified biochar. Moreover, the 2 4 exhibited high As mobilization in soil (Arabi et al. 2021). biochar-based catalyst exhibited high reusability and sta- Fe-modified biochar exhibited efficient removal of As bility with a minor loss in its activity after being reused from soil and reduced its mobility in paddy soil (Wen for six cycles. Microwave-assisted biofuel production has et  al. 2021). Similarly, Fe/Al/Zn (hydr)oxides modified recently gained great attention due to the advantages of biochar significantly reduced As uptake by arugula (Sun microwave heating (i.e., quick heating rate and energy et  al. 2021b). More importantly, Fe-modified biochar efficiency) (Nazir et al. 2021; Zailan et al. 2021). could be considered an efficient remediation material Syngas, produced through biomass gasification, usu - for moderately and highly Cd- and As-co-contaminated ally consists of H , CO, C H, CO , and other hydrocar- 2 4 2 farmland (Wen et al. 2021; Yang et al. 2021a, b). bons such as bio-oil or tar (Low and Yee 2021; Sun et al. 2021a). The addition of biochar as a catalyst for syngas Wu et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 8 of 21 Fig. 4 Employment of biochar as heterogeneous catalysts for biofuel production. Biodiesel production through biochar-catalyzed transesterification of lipid fraction extracted from the swine manure (a) (Cho et al. 2021); Biodiesel production with K CO + Cu(NO ) -treated 2 3 3 2 hydrochar as a catalyst (b) (Abdullah et al. 2021) production and upgrading has been largely reported a catalytic effect on tar removal (Feng et  al. 2021a ; Hu recently. Biochar-based catalysts have several advan- et  al. 2021a; Liu et  al. 2021c). By using walnut shell bio- tages in tar reforming and syngas cleaning: (1) the highly char with high contents of K O and CaO as a catalyst, the porous structure and large SSA are conducive to prolong- conversion efficiency of tar and H -rich gas production ing the retention time of the reactants and improving increased (Mazhkoo et  al. 2021). Anniwaer et  al. (2021) their conversion efficiency; (2) the abundant functional reported that biochar derived from Japanese cedarwood groups favor the reforming of volatiles from biomass heat possessed a highly porous structure and contained high treatment; and (3) the alkali and alkali earth metals and contents of alkali and alkaline earth metals, which might other inorganic species present in biochar can provide provide high catalytic activity for tar reforming. In this Wu  et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 9 of 21 study, 99% of the remaining tar was cracked/reformed, carbon sequestration potential of biochar produced from yielding H -rich syngas. Metal-supported biochar exhib- various crop residues. It was found that over 920 kg CO 2 2e ited excellent catalytic activity in syngas upgrading. Hu t- (CO -equivalent) sequestration could be achieved in et  al. (2021a) loaded Fe–Ni on pine wood biochar as a China, demonstrating great carbon sequestration poten- catalyst for syngas production; their results indicated tial through biochar that was incorporated into soil that Fe–Ni-supported biochar significantly increased H / (Fig. 5a). Similarly, Leppäkoski et al. (2021) calculated the CO ratio to 1.97 in syngas. In addition, Fe–Ni-supported carbon footprint of willow biochar production and appli- biochar still exhibited excellent catalytic activity after five cation in marginal lands by conducting a cradle-to-grave times of reuse. Similarly, an H concentration of 67.35% LCA. Their results found that the carbon footprint of −1 in syngas and a gasification efficiency of 96.93% could willow biochar was − 1875 kg CO t , in which carbon 2e −1 achieve by using Fe/Ca/Al-loaded biochar as a catalyst sequestration (− 1704 kg CO t ) dominated the carbon 2e (Hu et  al. 2021b). In short, engineered biochar has tre- footprint. It is estimated that 63 − 82% of initial carbon mendous promise as a catalyst in syngas upgrading. in biochar was stably sequestered in soil after 100  years of using a greenhouse gas inventory model (Woolf et  al. 3.4.3 Biochar for global climate change mitigation 2021). These results indicate the long-term sequestration Biochar production and amendment have been increas- of carbon by biochar storage in soil. ingly adopted to mitigate global climate change (Woolf Biochar also has a high potential for CO capture and et  al. 2021). China’s rising influence on global climate storage (Shafawi et  al. 2021). It has been reported that change mitigation advances biochar’s role in climate gov- a large surface area, high micro-porosity, and abundant ernance. The functionality of biochar to achieve carbon– mineral contents of biochar contributed to C O capture neutral goals is mainly through carbon sequestration and (Feng et  al. 2021b; Shafawi et  al. 2021). To highlight, emission reduction (Cao et al. 2021; Nan et al. 2021). The N-doped biochar showed a superior C O uptake capac- high content of aromatic carbon within biochar is the ity. The N-doped biochar prepared by urea phosphate basis of its carbon sequestration benefits (Xu et al. 2021). impregnation-pyrolysis had a superior CO adsorption −1 Biochar storage in soil via agricultural soil management capacity of 1.34  mmol  g (Ma et  al. 2021). The excel - can also realize carbon sequestration (Guenet et al. 2021). lent adsorption property of CO was attributed to the Therefore, converting biomass waste into biochar and enhanced microporous structure and various N-contain- storing the produced biochar in soil has excellent poten- ing functional groups on the biochar (Fig.  5b). A related tial for carbon sequestration. Yang et  al. (2021d) used a study by Feng et  al. (2021b) showed that NH ·H O 3 2 life cycle assessment at the country level to evaluate the activation was beneficial to forming micropores and Fig. 5 Country-level potential of carbon sequestration for biochar implementation (a) (Yang et al. 2021d); The removal mechanisms of C O by N-doped biochar (b) (Ma et al. 2021); The removal mechanisms of CO by NH ·H O-activated biochar (c) (Feng et al. 2021b); The mitigation 2 3 2 mechanisms of N O Emission by biochar at the cellular level (d) (Zhang et al. 2021 g) 2 Wu et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 10 of 21 introducing N-containing functional groups on biochar resulted from the decrease in nitrifier denitrification (by surfaces. The N-containing functional groups dominated 74%) and heterotrophic denitrification (by 58%) (Zhang the adsorption of CO (Fig. 5c). et  al. 2021e). The N stable isotope tracing techniques Nitrous oxide (N O) has a global warming potential may help to fully understand N O emission mitigation 2 2 of 298 times that of C O , which plays an essential role mechanisms by biochar. in global warming (Zhang et  al. 2021g). Excessive appli- Biochar has been well-reported to mitigate C H emis- cation of N fertilization and low N use efficiency are sions from paddy soil (Dong et al. 2021; Jiang et al. 2021; the primary sources of soil N O emissions (Reay et  al. Qi et al. 2021b). The mechanisms of CH emission miti- 2 4 2012; Tian et  al. 2019). Numerous studies have demon- gation by biochar mainly included: (i) biochar inhibited strated the effectiveness of biochar in mitigating N O the activity and abundance of methanogens but stimu- emissions (Deng et al. 2021a; Jiang et al. 2021; Shin et al. lated those of methanotrophs (Nan et  al. 2021); (ii) bio- 2021). Lower N O emissions involved several mecha- char increased the adsorption of CH in soil (Zhao et al. 2 4 nisms, which included abiotic N retention mechanisms 2021a). Contrastingly, other studies have found that bio- and microbial N immobilization mechanisms (Guenet char amendment increased CH emissions from paddy et  al. 2021; Lehmann et  al. 2021; Liao et  al. 2021). The soils (Cao et al. 2021; Yang et al. 2021h). The unintended promoted microbial reduction of N O to N by biochar consequence of an increase in CH emissions may result 2 2 4 amendment was believed to be a permanent mitigation from the improved aeration condition after biochar benefit as the transformation could not be reversed, and application (Cao et al. 2021). Moreover, biochar’s geocon- N had left the soil system. The microbial reduction of ductor function could directly transfer electrons to meth- N O to N could result from an increased expression of anogens, stimulating CH production (Yang et al. 2021h). 2 2 4 denitrification-associated functional genes (e.g., nosZ, The contradictory studies could be due to the differences nirK, nirK, and narG) (Deng et al. 2021a; Liao et al. 2021; in biochar and soil properties (Malyan et  al. 2021; Yang Wu et  al. 2021b). Additionally, biochar could act as an et al. 2021h). Based on the discussions, biochar has great electron shuttle to facilitate electron transfer and N O potential in mitigating C H emissions from paddy soils. 2 4 reduction through biochar’s O-containing functional However, scientific soil management and proper biochar groups and carbon matrices (Yuan et al. 2021; Zhao et al. are necessary to avoid the unintended consequence of 2021c). It is important to note that the positive effects increased CH production. of biochar on denitrification metabolism could be elu - cidated at the cellular level by integrating physiological 3.4.4 Bio char for salinity and drought stress amelioration and multi-omics (proteomic and metabolomics) analy- Biochar has the potential to enhance salinity tolerance to ses (Zhang et  al. 2021g). It was observed that biochar plants by improving soil physical (porosity, water hold- could directly modulate carbon metabolism and allocate ing capacity, hydraulic conductivity, pH, SOC), chemi- the produced reducing power, thereby promoting N O cal (Na bioavailability, cation–anion exchange capacity, reduction (Fig. 5d). N stable isotope tracing techniques nutrients, enzymatic activities), and biological (microbial have been widely used to gain insight into N O emissions activities, symbiotic N -fixation) properties (Farhangi- 2 2 in biochar-amended soils (Craswell et  al. 2021). Zhang Abriz and Ghassemi-Golezani 2021; Singh et  al. 2021). 15 18 et  al. (2021c) utilized a dual isotope (   N– O) labeling Incorporating biochar in salt-affected soil improved 2+ 2+ + technique to differentiate the contribution of nitrifier soluble cation (Ca, Mg ) contents but decreased N a nitrification, nitrifier denitrification, nitrification-coupled concentration through its high sorption capacity. The 2+ + denitrification, and heterotrophic denitrification to soil higher Ca concentration and lower Na concentration N O emissions amended with biochar. Their results indi - facilitated K and P uptake by plants and thus promoted cated that biochar reduced N O emissions derived from plant productivity (Zhou et  al. 2021d). It was also found nitrifier denitrification by 45–94%, nitrification-coupled that biochar amendment in saline soil increased photo- denitrification by 30–64%, and heterotrophic denitrifica - synthetic rate, leaf water content, stomatal conductance, tion by 35–46%. Biochar application for N O emission pigment contents, nutrient uptake, and root and shoot mitigation was due to the decrease of nitrite concen- growth (Cui et  al. 2021a; Farhangi-Abriz and Ghassemi- tration while increasing N O reduction (Zhang et  al. Golezani 2021; Liang et  al. 2021c; Singh et  al. 2021). In 2021c). A long-term field study also used a dual isotope some cases, toxic metal contamination and soil salinity 15 18 (   N– O) labeling technique to measure the effects of may cause a more serious environmental concern. Soil biochar on N O emissions; the results showed that bio- salinity may aggravate the stress caused by toxic metals char decreased N O emissions by 48% and 22% in acidic on plants (Azadi and Raiesi 2021; Shabbir et  al. 2021). and alkaline soils, respectively. Lower N O emissions Biochar has been reported to mitigate the potential pres- sures of the co-occurrence of toxic metal contamination Wu  et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 11 of 21 and salinity (Azadi and Raiesi 2021; Shabbir et al. 2021). Toxic metals and antibiotics/antibiotic resistance The salt stress could also be alleviated by supplement - genes (ARGs) are the main contaminants in composting ing biochar with other additives. In addition, combining products (Lu et  al. 2021; Zhou et  al. 2021a). It has been biochar with compost has increased plant productivity reported that biochar amendment aerobic composting (Liang et al. 2021b). is an efficient technology for reducing ARGs abundance Drought stress has been considered a major chal- in livestock manure and sewage sludge (Fu et  al. 2021c; lenge for sustainable agricultural productivity (Man- Zhou et  al. 2021a). Qiu et  al. (2021) found that biochar soor et  al. 2021). It has been discovered that biochar reduced the total abundance of ARGs by 17.6% dur- amendment improved the retention and availability ing sewage sludge composting. The analysis revealed of soil water, which led to enhanced stomatal con- that biochar reduced the abundance of bacterial patho- ductance, photosynthetic rate, and productivity gens such as Bacteroides and Pseudomonas. It is sug- under drought stress (Fu et  al. 2021a; Kim et  al. 2021; gested that change in the bacterial community by biochar Safahani Langeroodi et  al. 2021). Biochar played a amendment dominated the reduction in the risk of ARGs positive role in nutrient supply and improved plant in manure/sludge composting (Mazhar et  al. 2021; Qiu performance in the clay soil under drought conditions et  al. 2021). Composting livestock manure or sewage (Mannan et  al. 2021). The biochar amendment could sludge with biochar has also been reported to reduce also alleviate the oxidative damage of plants induced the mobility and bioavailability of toxic metals. In sheep by drought stress (Khan et  al. 2021; Safahani Lan- manure composting, 10% biochar dose passivated copper geroodi et al. 2021). Overall, biochar is an efficient soil (Cu) and zinc (Zn) by 46.95% and 56.27%, respectively. amendment to ameliorate soil salinity/drought stress, Additionally, microbial diversity was improved, and improve soil functions, and promote plant productiv- Firmicutes was the dominant bacterial phylum in bio- ity in salt/drought-affected soil. char-based composting (Duan et  al. 2021). In similar studies, biochar amendment had a positive impact on the diversity of toxic metal-resistant bacteria and toxic met- 3.4.5 Biochar amendment in composting als (Cu, Zn, Pb, Ni, Cr, As) passivation during livestock Composting is a promising technology to convert organic manure/sewage sludge composting (Liu et  al. 2021b; waste into stable and humus-like products for use as Song et  al. 2021; Zhang et  al. 2021a). More importantly, organic fertilizer (Lu et al. 2021; Shan et al. 2021; Yin et al. reducing the bioavailability of toxic metals was responsi- 2021). Composting is a cost-effective way to manage agri - ble for lowering ARGs abundance (Qiu et al. 2021). cultural and breeding industry waste in China. However, No more than 10% biochar dose was recommended some issues such as greenhouse gases (CH, CO , and because excess biochar addition could cause severe water 4 2 N O) and odorous emissions (NH and H S), and nitro- loss and heat dissipation, thus negatively affecting the 2 3 2 gen loss during composting impede the development of composting process (Wang et  al. 2021c). Moreover, the these practices (Yin et  al. 2021; Zhou et  al. 2021c). The cost of biochar may also be a limiting factor (Wang et al. functionality of biochar as a bulking agent for compost- 2021e). ing has been proven to be a promising strategy for solv- ing the environmental trade-offs of composting. Biochar 3.4.6 Bio char as additives in anaerobic digestion as additives could enhance the aeration rate and provide Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a biological treatment main shelters for microorganisms to enhance their activ- method to convert organic wastes into renewable biogas ity, thus improving the humification process and com - and biofertilizer and to sustain waste management posting performance as well as minimizing GHGs and (Ambaye et al. 2021; Su et al. 2021). Particularly, organic odor emissions. These capabilities are mainly attributed wet wastes, including livestock manure, food waste, and to its unique properties, including porous structure, large sewage sludge, are the most commonly used wastes for SSA, and abundant functional groups (Awasthi et  al. AD. However, several key challenges persisted thor- 2021; Guo et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2021c). HHT is a criti- oughly, including low methane efficiency, operational cal parameter in assessing biochar’s function in mitigat- instability, unsatisfactory substrate degradation, and gen- ing GHGs emissions during composting (Yin et al. 2021). eration of toxic metabolic intermediates and gaseous pol- It is concluded that biochar pyrolyzed at high tempera- lutants (Zhang and Wang 2021). tures (500–900  °C) is more effective in mitigating CH Biochar has been identified as an effective additive to and N O emissions; in comparison, biochar produced at boost and improve AD performance (Qi et  al. 2021c; low temperatures (< 500 °C) has a greater effect on reduc - Shi et  al. 2021b; Sugiarto et  al. 2021a). It could sig- ing NH emissions (Yin et al. 2021). nificantly assist in shortening the lag phase of organic Wu et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 12 of 21 Fig. 6 Proposed schematic of dark fermentative hydrogen enhanced with biochar (a) (Bu et al. 2021); The anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge promoted by hydrochar and biochar (b) (Shi et al. 2021b) biodegradation, improving the production of methane volatile fatty acids)), and accelerated direct interspecies (CH ) and hydrogen (H ). Such improvement in AD electron transfer (DIET) (Ambaye et  al. 2021; Bu et  al. 4 2 process efficiency with biochar amendment could be 2021; Qi et al. 2021c). Bu et al. (2021) reported that bio- attributed to buffering capacity, adsorption of inhibi - char significantly boosted H production from pretreated tory substances (e.g., ammonia nitrogen (NH -N) and sugarcane bagasse by implementing efficient enrichment 4 Wu  et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 13 of 21 Table 2 Biochar performance in anaerobic digestion (AD) for the treatment of organic wet wastes Feedstock HTT (°C) Substrate in AD Dosage Performance References −1 Wood chip 700, 800, 900 Seed sludge 12 g L 900 °C HTT enhanced Qi et al. (2021d) specific CH production to −1 742 mL g ethanol Fenton sludge 200, 400, 600, 800 Seed sludge + feeding – 400 °C HTT increased CH Wang et al. (2021b) substrate production by 38.1% −1 Pine sawdust 650, 900 Food waste 15 g L 900 °C HTT increased Sugiarto et al. (2021a) cumulative CH produc- tion by 46.9% −1 Corn straw 300, 400, 500 Kitchen waste 10 g L 400 °C HTT enhanced CH Wang et al. (2021a) production rate by 152% −1 Enhanced accumula- Zhang et al. (2021b) Horticultural waste < 500 Seed sludge + food waste 50 g L tive CH production to −1 126.7 mL g volatile solid −1 RIce husk 550 Corn stover + chicken 10 g L Enhanced specific CH Yu et al. (2021) manure production by 18.5% Waste apple tree branch 550 Potato pulp waste + dairy 2% TS content Potato pulp waste/ Chen et al. (2021a) manure dairy manure enhanced maximum CH yield of −1 200 mL g TS Rice husk 300 Swine manure5% TS Increased accumulative Yang et al. (2021f ) waste CH yield by 23.6% −1 Waste wood pellet 800 Food waste 25 g L Enhanced the ultimate Cui et al. (2021b) accumulative CH yield by 214% −1 Corn stover 300, 400, 500 Waste activated sludge 1.0 g g 300 °C HTT increased the Shen et al. (2021) maximum CH production rate by 181.6% −1 Hickory wood chip 400, 900 Seed sludge 12 g L 900 °C HTT increased Qi et al. (2021c) specific CH production to 725 mL CH /g ethanol −1 Corn straw Hydrochar (260, 320); Waste activated sludge 10 g L Hydrochar (260 °C) Shi et al. (2021b) Biochar (500, 700) increased the CH meth- ane yield by 25.6% −1 Corn stover500, HNO -modification Food waste 10 g L Increased CH production Gao et al. (2021) 3 4 by 90% −1 Corn straw 550, nZVI-modification Sewage sludge + food 3.0 g g Increased the maximum Zhang and Wang (2021) waste CH production rate by 49.87% and colonization of functional bacteria and activating the increased DIET between syntrophic microorganisms extracellular electron transfer between functional bac- and the activity of microorganisms (Qi et al. 2021a). Bio- teria (Fig.  6a). Moreover, biochar amendment could also char could advance MPs removal in AD through direct advance the removal of key contaminants during the AD adsorption. In addition, biochar amendment could pro- treatment of organic wet wastes, such as heavy metals, mote microbial activity in AD, thus enhancing the bio- antibiotics, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), degradation of MPs (Qi et al. 2021d). Table 2 summarizes and microplastics (MPs). Biochar has been considered a the effects of biochar on AD performance. passivator to reduce the bioavailability of heavy metals The mineral contents (e.g., Fe, Ca, K, Na) present in by electrostatic adsorption, physical adsorption, compl- biochar play a crucial role in promoting C H and hydro- exation, precipitation, and redox effect in AD (Qi et  al. gen production. It was reported that the addition of 2021a). Adsorption and promotion of biodegradation leached biochar in the AD system resulted in lower C H are critical pathways for removing antibiotics with bio- and hydrogen production compared to unleached bio- char amendment in AD (Cheng et al. 2021). Biochar has char treatment (Sugiarto et  al. 2021b). The role of iron high-effective performance in promoting the biodegrada - (Fe) within biochar in boosting C H production in the tion of PAHs in AD. The enhancement was attributed to AD system was largely reported in 2021. Wang et  al. Wu et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 14 of 21 (2021b) showed that magnetite-contained biochar pre- resulting in the accumulation of toxic metabolic inter- pared from Fenton sludge pyrolyzed at 400  °C signifi - mediates that could delay methane production (Ambaye cantly improved AD performance due to magnetite’s high et al. 2021). conductivity. Fe-modified biochar could act as a catalytic medium for substrate hydrolysis and accelerating metha-4 Conclusions and perspectives nogenesis. The generated Fe oxides on the biochar sur - CiteSpace-based scientometric analysis was used to face contributed to the interspecies electron transfer in analyze the research trends and hotspots in the biochar syntrophic metabolism (Deng et  al. 2021b). Therefore, field based on 5535 publications collected from WoS introducing Fe oxides into biochar has great potential to core collection in 2021. The number of publications has improve AD performance. expanded dramatically in 2021 and the growth trend may Hydrochar has also been demonstrated to enhance AD continue. China and USA were pioneers in this field. The performance. He et  al. (2021) showed that hydrochar keyword clustering analysis indicated that “Biochar for promoted methane production rates by 36.4–237% in toxic metal immobilization”, “Biochar-based catalyst for AD of organic wastes via DIET mediated through surface biofuel production”, “Biochar for global climate change oxygen-containing functional groups. Hydrochar pre- mitigation”, “Biochar for salinity and drought stress ame- pared at lower temperatures had greater surface oxygen- lioration”, “Biochar amendment in composting”, and containing functional groups, which were related to the “Biochar as additives in anaerobic digestion” were the facilitated DIET. Similarly, Shi et  al. (2021a) found that main research trends and hotspots in biochar research hydrochar increased the methane yield and production in 2021. The employment of biochar as heterogeneous rate by 31.4% and 30.8%, respectively. Genome-centric catalysts for biofuel production became the focus of bio- metatranscriptomics analysis revealed that hydrochar char research in 2021. Biochar’s applications for heavy behaved as an electron shuttle to promote DIET between metal immobilization, global climate mitigation, salin- Syntrophomonas sp. FDU0164 and Methanosarcina sp. ity and drought stress amelioration, biofuel production, FDU0106. It should be noted that hydrochar exhibited and anaerobic digestion promotion represent sustainable a superior ability to promote methane yield and produc- growing topics in 2021. However, bioremediation using tion rate than biochar. Hydrochar had greater surface functional bacteria immobilized on biochar and biochar- oxygen-containing functional groups, which were related assisted advanced oxidation process were well-studied to facilitated DIET and enhanced methane yield and pro- but with less frequency in 2021 than in 2020. In short, the duction rate. The metabolomic analysis also showed that present review provides a comprehensive overview of the the alterations of metabolites associated with fatty acids research and the evolution of research hotspots in bio- and amino acids metabolism induced by hydrochar were char research. stronger than those of biochar (Fig. 6b) (Shi et al. 2021b). Although biochar has multifunctional applications in The addition of biochar in the anaerobic co-digestion agriculture, environment, and energy, its potential eco- of food waste or livestock manure with sewage sludge has logical risks, and long-term safety and implications are recently aroused considerable attention. It has highly syn- of great concern. Previous studies have confirmed that ergistic effects on hydrolysis acidification and methane biochar contained several toxic components, includ- production compared with digestion alone (Johnravin- ing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHs), volatile dar et  al. 2021; Liang et  al. 2021a; Zhang et  al. 2021d). organic compounds (VOCs), polychlorinated dibenzo- A recent study indicated that the anaerobic co-digestion p-dioxins (PCDDs), persistent free radicals (PFRs), toxic of pig manure with municipal sludge enhanced methane metals, and water-soluble organic compounds (WSOCs) yield by 83.0–136.5% and 31.3–68.0% at mesophilic and (Brtnicky et al. 2021; Godlewska et al. 2021). The detri - thermophilic temperatures, respectively (Zhang et  al. mental effects of these harmful substances were corre - 2021d). Notably, certain disadvantages of incompatible lated with their bioavailable fraction, which depended inoculum-to-substrate ratio, excessive acidification, and on the feedstock and preparation methods (Godlewska organic overloading may lead to the inhibition of biogas et  al. 2021; Wang et  al. 2019). PAHs are mostly formed production (Liang et al. 2021a). during the incomplete combustion of biowaste (Wang It is noted that biochar/hydrochar addition, exceed- et  al. 2017). It is suggested that biochar produced by ing a certain amount, could negatively affect AD perfor - slow pyrolysis had lower PAHs than by fast pyrolysis mance. In some cases, the negative effect was due to the (Wang et  al. 2017). Biochar produced under medium high sorption capacities of biochar, which might reduce temperatures (400–600 °C) often contained higher con- the contact between microbes and substrates. Another tents of bioavailable PAHs. In general, the majority of potential explanation is that a high dose of biochar accel- biochars contained a low bioavailable fraction of PAHs erated the hydrolysis and acidogenesis-acetogenesis, (Tomczyk et  al. 2020). PCDD/Fs are mainly formed on Wu  et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 15 of 21 the surface of biochar during the thermal treatment of contaminants are mainly originated from feedstock feedstock, especially food waste (El-Naggar et al. 2019). rich in heavy metals, especially sewage sludge, animal It is reported that low temperatures (200–400  °C) and manure, and plants grown on heavy metal-contami- short residence time favored the formation of PCDDs nated soils. The conversion of biomass abundant with on biochar surface (Lyu et  al. 2016). It is accepted heavy metals to biochar is considered a promising that PCDDs always existed in low quantities in bio- method for safely disposing of biomass and significantly char and posed a relatively marginal risk to organisms reducing the bioavailability and leaching of heavy met- (Godlewska et  al. 2021; Weidemann et  al. 2018). VOCs als (Devi and Saroha 2014; Wang et al. 2019; Zhang et al. are mainly formed on biochar surfaces or/and inside 2020). The contents of certain heavy metals increased biochar pores by the thermal decomposition of bio- with increasing HTTs, which may be attributed mainly mass. The contents of VOCs in biochar decreased with to the ‘concentration effect’ resulting from a decrease increasing HTTs (Buss et  al. 2015). Numerous stud- in biochar yield (Zhang et  al. 2020). The bioavailabil - ies have reported the stable and large molecular PFRs ity of heavy metals depends on heavy metal contents in biochar during the biomass carbonization process in raw biomass and the transformation and dissolution (Liao et al. 2014; Lieke et al. 2018; Yang et al. 2016; Zhen of heavy metals in biochar (Godlewska et al. 2021). The et al. 2021). It was found that the electron paramagnetic release of water-soluble organic compounds (WSOCs) resonance (EPR) signals in lignin-derived biochar were from hydrochar was higher than from biochar. With the higher than those in cellulose-derived biochar. The EPR increase in HTT, the contents of phenols and organic signals increased with increasing HTT for the major- acids in WSOCs increased (Hao et al. 2018). ity of biochar (Liao et  al. 2014). Besides organic com- Despite the ecologically acceptable levels of these pounds, heavy metals (e.g., Cd, Cu, and Pb) in biochar harmful substances for most biochar, it may pose an are highly concerned with their toxicity. Heavy metal ecological risk to soil biota (Fig.  7). For example, it is Fig. 7 Potential risks associated with biochar application to soils Wu et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 16 of 21 Received: 21 September 2022 Revised: 26 December 2022 Accepted: 2 revealed that the attendance of some contaminants (e.g., January 2023 PAHs, cresols, methylated phenols) in biochar might cause direct toxicity to soil microorganisms (Oleszczuk and Koltowski 2018; Yang et  al. 2019), for example, sig- nificant germination inhibition, plasma membrane dis - References ruption, and plant growth retardation (Liao et  al. 2014). Abdullah RF, Rashid U, Ibrahim ML, NolHakim MAHL, Moser BR, Alharthi FA (2021) Bifunctional biomass-based catalyst for biodiesel production via When incorporated into agricultural soils, dust emis- hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) pretreatment—synthesis, characteri- sions from biochar may cause a health hazard for farm- zation and optimization. Process Saf Environ 156:219–230. https:// doi. ers (Li et  al. 2018). The nano biochar after ball milling org/ 10. 1016/j. psep. 2021. 10. 007 Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan N, Mohan D, Vithanage M, had a higher potential ecological risk than pristine bio- Lee SS, Ok YS (2014) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management char due to its unique nanotoxicity (Huang et  al. 2021). in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19–33. https:// doi. org/ 10. Moreover, soil physicochemical changes caused by bio- 1016/j. chemo sphere. 2013. 10. 071 Ambaye TG, Rene ER, Nizami AS, Dupont C, Vaccari M, van Hullebusch ED char amendment may indirectly induce ecotoxicity to soil (2021) Beneficial role of biochar addition on the anaerobic digestion of organisms. The increase in soil pH after biochar addition food waste: a systematic and critical review of the operational param- may negatively affect earthworm reproductions (Van eters and mechanisms. J Environ Manage 290:112537. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jenvm an. 2021. 112537 Zwieten et  al. 2009). The strong adsorption of nutrients Anniwaer A, Chaihad N, Zahra ACA, Yu T, Kasai Y, Kongparakul S, Samart C, by biochar would reduce the bioavailability of nutrients, Abudula A, Guan G (2021) Steam co-gasification of Japanese cedar - thus inhibiting plant growth. Similarly, the accessibility wood and its commercial biochar for hydrogen-rich gas production. Int J Hydrogen Energ 46:34587–34598. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ijhyd ene. of water to plants would decrease due to biochar’s strong 2021. 08. 032 water retention capacity (Brtnicky et  al. 2021). It has to Arabi Z, Rinklebe J, El-Naggar A, Hou D, Sarmah AK, Moreno-Jimenez E (2021) be noted that an appropriate biochar application rate (Im)mobilization of arsenic, chromium, and nickel in soils via biochar: a meta-analysis. Environ Pollut 286:117199. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. may not have unintended adverse effects on soil organ - envpol. 2021. 117199 isms. Still, excess biochar addition is likely to generate Awasthi SK, Duan Y, Liu T, Zhou Y, Qin S, Liu H, Varjani S, Awasthi MK, Zhang Z, unintended consequences. Pandey A, Taherzadeh MJ (2021) Sequential presence of heavy metal resistant fungal communities influenced by biochar amendment in the poultry manure composting process. J Clean Prod 291:125947. https:// Supplementary Information doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jclep ro. 2021. 125947 The online version contains supplementary material available at https:// doi. Azadi N, Raiesi F (2021) Salinity-induced changes in cadmium availability affect org/ 10. 1007/ s42773- 023- 00204-2. soil microbial and biochemical functions: mitigating role of biochar. Chemosphere 274:129924. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. chemo sphere. 2021. 129924 Additional file 1. Table S1 The top 10 most productive countries in Brtnicky M, Datta R, Holatko J, Bielska L, Gusiatin ZM, Kucerik J, Hammer- biochararea in 2021. Table S2 The top 10 institutions in the field of schmiedt T, Danish S, Radziemska M, Mravcova L, Fahad S, Kintl A, biocharresearch in 2021. Fig. S1 The number of published documents on Sudoma M, Ahmed N et al (2021) A critical review of the possible biocharresearch. Fig. S2 Countries performing biochar research in 2021. adverse effects of biochar in the soil environment. Sci Total Environ 796:148756. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2021. 148756 Acknowledgements Bu J, Wei HL, Wang Y T, Cheng JR, Zhu MJ (2021) Biochar boosts dark fermenta- Not applicable. tive H2 production from sugarcane bagasse by selective enrichment/ colonization of functional bacteria and enhancing extracellular electron Author contributions transfer. Water Res 202:117440. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. watres. 2021. PW: Investigation, writing-original draft and editing, funding acquisition; BS: 117440 Writing-review and editing; HW: Review and editing; ZJ: Investigation; YW: Buss W (2021) Pyrolysis solves the issue of organic contaminants in sewage Investigation, review and editing, funding acquisition; WC: Investigation, sludge while retaining carbon—making the case for sewage sludge review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. treatment via pyrolysis. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9:10048–10053. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acssu schem eng. 1c036 51 Funding Buss W, Masek O, Graham M, Wust D (2015) Inherent organic compounds This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China in biochar—their content, composition and potential toxic effects. J (Project No. 42225701, 42007355). Environ Manage 156:150–157. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jenvm an. 2015. 03. 035 Availability of data and materials Cao Y, Shan Y, Wu P, Zhang P, Zhang Z, Zhao F, Zhu T (2021) Mitigating the All data generated during the current study are available from the correspond- global warming potential of rice paddy fields by straw and straw- ing author on reasonable request. derived biochar amendments. Geoderma 396:115081. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. geode rma. 2021. 115081 Cha JS, Park SH, Jung S-C, Ryu C, Jeon J-K, Shin M-C, Park Y-K (2016) Production Declarations and utilization of biochar: a review. J Ind Eng Chem 40:1–15. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jiec. 2016. 06. 002 Ethics approval and consent to participate Chen C (2004) Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowl- No applicable. edge domain visualization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(Suppl_1):5303– 5310. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1073/ pnas. 03075 13100 Competing interests Chen C (2017) Science mapping: a systematic review of the literature. J Data The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests Info Sci 2:1–40. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1515/ jdis- 2017- 0006 or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Wu  et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 17 of 21 Chen YD, Wang R, Duan X, Wang S, Ren NQ, Ho SH (2020) Production, proper- El-Naggar A, Chang SX, Cai Y, Lee YH, Wang J, Wang SL, Ryu C, Rinklebe J, Sik ties, and catalytic applications of sludge derived biochar for environ- Ok Y (2021) Mechanistic insights into the (im)mobilization of arsenic, mental remediation. Water Res 187:116390. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. cadmium, lead, and zinc in a multi-contaminated soil treated with watres. 2020. 116390 different biochars. Environ Int 156:106638. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. Chen M, Liu S, Yuan X, Li QX, Wang F, Xin F, Wen B (2021) Methane production envint. 2021. 106638 and characteristics of the microbial community in the co-digestion of Farhangi-Abriz S, Ghassemi-Golezani K (2021) Changes in soil properties and potato pulp waste and dairy manure amended with biochar. Renew salt tolerance of safflower in response to biochar-based metal oxide Energ 163:357–367. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. renene. 2020. 09. 006 nanocomposites of magnesium and manganese. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf Chen Z, Lu Z, Zhang Y, Li B, Chen C, Shen K (2021b) Eec ff ts of biochars com- 211:111904. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ecoenv. 2021. 111904 bined with ferrous sulfate and pig manure on the bioavailability of Cd Farkas E, Feigl V, Gruiz K, Vaszita E, Fekete-Kertesz I, Tolner M, Kerekes I, Pusztai and potential phytotoxicity for wheat in an alkaline contaminated soil. E, Kari A, Uzinger N, Rekasi M, Kirchkeszner C, Molnar M (2020) Long- Sci Total Environ 753:141832. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2020. term effects of grain husk and paper fibre sludge biochar on acidic 141832 and calcareous sandy soils—a scale-up field experiment applying a Cheng D, Ngo HH, Guo W, Chang SW, Nguyen DD, Nguyen QA, Zhang J, Liang complex monitoring toolkit. Sci Total Environ 731:138988. https:// doi. S (2021) Improving sulfonamide antibiotics removal from swine waste-org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2020. 138988 water by supplying a new pomelo peel derived biochar in an anaerobic Feng D, Guo D, Shang Q, Zhao Y, Zhang L, Guo X, Cheng J, Chang G, Guo Q, membrane bioreactor. Bioresource Technol 319:124160. https:// doi. org/ Sun S (2021a) Mechanism of biochar-gas-tar-soot formation during 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2020. 124160 pyrolysis of different biomass feedstocks: effect of inherent metal spe - Chi NTL, Anto S, Ahamed TS, Kumar SS, Shanmugam S, Samuel MS, Mathimani cies. Fuel 293:120409. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. fuel. 2021. 120409 T, Brindhadevi K, Pugazhendhi A (2021) A review on biochar production Feng D, Guo D, Zhang Y, Sun S, Zhao Y, Chang G, Guo Q, Qin Y (2021b) techniques and biochar based catalyst for biofuel production from Adsorption-enrichment characterization of CO and dynamic retention algae. Fuel 287:119411. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. fuel. 2020. 119411 of free NH in functionalized biochar with H O/NH ·H O activation 3 2 3 2 Cho S-H, Jung S, Park Y-K, Lin K-YA, Chen W-H, Tsang YF, Kwon EE (2021) Biofuel for promotion of new ammonia-based carbon capture. Chem Eng J production as an example of virtuous valorization of swine manure. 409:128193. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. cej. 2020. 128193 ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9:13761–13772. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acssu Fu G, Qiu X, Xu X, Zhang W, Zang F, Zhao C (2021a) The role of biochar particle schem eng. 1c043 82 size and application rate in promoting the hydraulic and physical Craswell ET, Chalk PM, Kaudal BB (2021) Role of 15N in tracing biologically properties of sandy desert soil. CATENA 207:105607. https:// doi. org/ 10. driven nitrogen dynamics in soils amended with biochar: a review. Soil 1016/j. catena. 2021. 105607 Biol Biochem 162:108416. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. soilb io. 2021. 108416 Fu H, Ma S, Xu S, Duan R, Cheng G, Zhao P (2021b) Hierarchically porous mag- Cui Q, Xia J, Yang H, Liu J, Shao P (2021a) Biochar and effective microorganisms netic biochar as an efficient amendment for cadmium in water and soil: promote Sesbania cannabina growth and soil quality in the coastal performance and mechanism. Chemosphere 281:130990. https:// doi. saline-alkali soil of the Yellow River Delta, China. Sci Total Environ org/ 10. 1016/j. chemo sphere. 2021. 130990 756:143801. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2020. 143801 Fu Y, Zhang A, Guo T, Zhu Y, Shao Y (2021c) Biochar and hyperthermophiles Cui Y, Mao F, Zhang J, He Y, Tong YW, Peng Y (2021b) Biochar enhanced high- as additives accelerate the removal of antibiotic resistance genes and solid mesophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste: cell viability and mobile genetic elements during composting. Materials (basel). https:// methanogenic pathways. Chemosphere 272:129863. https:// doi. org/ 10. doi. org/ 10. 3390/ ma141 85428 1016/j. chemo sphere. 2021. 129863 Gao B, Wang Y, Huang L, Liu S (2021) Study on the performance of Cuong DV, Wu PC, Chen LI, Hou CH (2021) Active MnO2/biochar composite HNO -modified biochar for enhanced medium temperature anaerobic for efficient As(III) removal: insight into the mechanisms of redox digestion of food waste. Waste Manag 135:338–346. https:// doi. org/ 10. transformation and adsorption. Water Res 188:116495. https:// doi. org/ 1016/j. wasman. 2021. 09. 020 10. 1016/j. watres. 2020. 116495 Godlewska P, Ok YS, Oleszczuk P (2021) The dark side of black gold: ecotoxico- Deng B, Yuan X, Siemann E, Wang S, Fang H, Wang B, Gao Y, Shad N, Liu X, logical aspects of biochar and biochar-amended soils. J Hazard Mater Zhang W, Guo X, Zhang L (2021) Feedstock particle size and pyrolysis 403:123833. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jhazm at. 2020. 123833 temperature regulate effects of biochar on soil nitrous oxide and Gopinath A, Divyapriya G, Srivastava V, Laiju AR, Nidheesh PV, Kumar MS (2021) carbon dioxide emissions. Waste Manag 120:33–40. https:// doi. org/ 10. Conversion of sewage sludge into biochar: a potential resource in 1016/j. wasman. 2020. 11. 015 water and wastewater treatment. Environ Res 194:110656. https:// doi. Deng Y, Xia J, Zhao R, Liu X, Xu J (2021b) Modified biochar promotes the direct org/ 10. 1016/j. envres. 2020. 110656 interspecies electron transfer between iron-reducing bacteria and Guenet B, Gabrielle B, Chenu C, Arrouays D, Balesdent J, Bernoux M, Bruni E, methanogens in high organic loading co-digestion. Bioresour Technol Caliman JP, Cardinael R, Chen S, Ciais P, Desbois D, Fouche J, Frank S et al 342:126030. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2021. 126030 (2021) Can N O emissions offset the benefits from soil organic carbon Devi P, Saroha AK (2014) Risk analysis of pyrolyzed biochar made from paper storage? Glob Chang Biol 27:237–256. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ gcb. mill effluent treatment plant sludge for bioavailability and eco-toxicity 15342 of heavy metals. Bioresour Technol 162:308–315. https:// doi. org/ 10. Guo X-x, Wu S-b, Wang X-q, Liu H-t (2021) Impact of biochar addition on three- 1016/j. biort ech. 2014. 03. 093 dimensional structural changes in aggregates associated with humus Dong D, Li J, Ying S, Wu J, Han X, Teng Y, Zhou M, Ren Y, Jiang P (2021) Mitiga- during swine manure composting. J Clean Prod 280:124380. https:// doi. tion of methane emission in a rice paddy field amended with biochar-org/ 10. 1016/j. jclep ro. 2020. 124380 based slow-release fertilizer. Sci Total Environ 792:148460. https:// doi. Hagemann N, Joseph S, Schmidt HP, Kammann CI, Harter J, Borch T, Young RB, org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2021. 148460 Varga K, Taherymoosavi S, Elliott KW, McKenna A, Albu M, Mayrhofer Duan Y, Yang J, Guo Y, Wu X, Tian Y, Li H, Awasthi MK (2021) Pollution control C, Obst M et al (2017) Organic coating on biochar explains its nutrient in biochar-driven clean composting: emphasize on heavy metal pas- retention and stimulation of soil fertility. Nat Commun 8:1089. https:// sivation and gaseous emissions mitigation. J Hazard Mater 420:126635. doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41467- 017- 01123-0 https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jhazm at. 2021. 126635 Hao S, Zhu X, Liu Y, Qian F, Fang Z, Shi Q, Zhang S, Chen J, Ren ZJ (2018) Dutta S, He M, Xiong X, Tsang DCW (2021) Sustainable management and recy- Production temperature effects on the structure of hydrochar-derived cling of food waste anaerobic digestate: a review. Bioresour Technol dissolved organic matter and associated toxicity. Environ Sci Technol 341:125915. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2021. 125915 52:7486–7495. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acs. est. 7b049 83 El-Naggar A, El-Naggar AH, Shaheen SM, Sarkar B, Chang SX, Tsang DCW, Rin- He J, Ren S, Zhang S, Luo G (2021) Modification of hydrochar increased klebe J, Ok YS (2019) Biochar composition-dependent impacts on soil the capacity to promote anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technol nutrient release, carbon mineralization, and potential environmental 341:125856. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2021. 125856 risk: a review. J Environ Manage 241:458–467. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. Hsu CJ, Cheng YH, Huang YP, Atkinson JD, Hsi HC (2021) A novel synthesis of jenvm an. 2019. 02. 044 sulfurized magnetic biochar for aqueous Hg(II) capture as a potential Wu et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 18 of 21 method for environmental remediation in water. Sci Total Environ Liang J, Luo L, Li D, Varjani S, Xu Y, Wong JWC (2021a) Promoting anaerobic 784:147240. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2021. 147240 co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste with different types of Hu Z, Miao Z, Chen H, Wu J, Wu W, Ren Y, Jiang E (2021) Chemical looping gasi- conductive materials: performance, stability, and underlying mecha- fication of biochar to produce hydrogen-rich syngas using Fe/Ca-based nism. Bioresour Technol 337:125384. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. oxygen carrier prepared by coprecipitation. J Energy Inst 94:157–166. 2021. 125384 https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. joei. 2020. 12. 006 Liang JF, Li QW, Gao JQ, Feng JG, Zhang XY, Hao YJ, Yu FH (2021b) Biochar- Hu J, Jia Z, Zhao S, Wang W, Zhang Q, Liu R, Huang Z (2021a) Activated char compost addition benefits Phragmites australis growth and soil prop - supported Fe–Ni catalyst for syngas production from catalytic gasifica- erty in coastal wetlands. Sci Total Environ 769:145166. https:// doi. org/ tion of pine wood. Bioresour Technol 340:125600. https:// doi. org/ 10. 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2021. 145166 1016/j. biort ech. 2021. 125600 Liang JF, Li QW, Gao JQ, Feng JG, Zhang XY, Wu YQ, Yu FH (2021c) Biochar Huang XC, Zhu SS, Zhang HL, Huang YC, Wang XD, Wang Y, Chen D (2021) rhizosphere addition promoted Phragmites australis growth and Biochar nanoparticles induced distinct biological effects on freshwater changed soil properties in the Yellow River Delta. Sci Total Environ algae via oxidative stress, membrane damage, and nutrient depletion. 761:143291. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2020. 143291 ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9:10761–10770. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acssu Liao S, Pan B, Li H, Zhang D, Xing B (2014) Detecting free radicals in biochars schem eng. 1c018 14 and determining their ability to inhibit the germination and growth Inyang MI, Gao B, Yao Y, Xue Y, Zimmerman A, Mosa A, Pullammanappallil P, Ok of corn, wheat and rice seedlings. Environ Sci Technol 48:8581–8587. YS, Cao X (2015) A review of biochar as a low-cost adsorbent for aque-https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ es404 250a ous heavy metal removal. Crit Rev Env Sci Tec 46:406–433. https:// doi. Liao J, Hu A, Zhao Z, Liu X, Jiang C, Zhang Z (2021) Biochar with large specific org/ 10. 1080/ 10643 389. 2015. 10968 80 surface area recruits N O-reducing microbes and mitigate N O emis- 2 2 Islam MS, Kwak JH, Nzediegwu C, Wang S, Palansuriya K, Kwon EE, Naeth MA, sion. Soil Biol Biochem 156:108212. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. soilb io. El-Din MG, Ok YS, Chang SX (2021) Biochar heavy metal removal in 2021. 108212 aqueous solution depends on feedstock type and pyrolysis purging Lieke T, Zhang XC, Steinberg CEW, Pan B (2018) Overlooked risks of biochars: gas. Environ Pollut 281:117094. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. envpol. 2021. persistent free radicals trigger neurotoxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans. 117094 Environ Sci Technol 52:7981–7987. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acs. est. Jellali S, Khiari B, Usman M, Hamdi H, Charabi Y, Jeguirim M (2021) Sludge-8b013 38 derived biochars: a review on the influence of synthesis conditions on Liu L, Huang L, Huang R, Lin H, Wang D (2021a) Immobilization of heavy met- pollutants removal efficiency from wastewaters. Renew Sust Energ Rev als in biochar derived from co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and calcium 144:111068. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. rser. 2021. 111068 sulfate. J Hazard Mater 403:123648. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jhazm at. Jiang Z, Yang S, Pang Q, Xu Y, Chen X, Sun X, Qi S, Yu W (2021) Biochar 2020. 123648 improved soil health and mitigated greenhouse gas emission from Liu L, Ye Q, Wu Q, Liu T, Peng S (2021b) Eec ff t of biochar addition on sludge controlled irrigation paddy field: insights into microbial diversity. J aerobic composting and greenbelt utilization. Environ Technol Inno Clean Prod 318:128595. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jclep ro. 2021. 128595 21:101279. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. eti. 2020. 101279 Johnravindar D, Wong JWC, Chakraborty D, Bodedla G, Kaur G (2021) Food Liu Y, Paskevicius M, Wang H, Parkinson G, Wei J, Asif Akhtar M, Li C-Z (2021c) waste and sewage sludge co-digestion amended with different Insights into the mechanism of tar reforming using biochar as a cata- biochars: VFA kinetics, methane yield and digestate quality assessment. lyst. Fuel 296:120672. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. fuel. 2021. 120672 J Environ Manage 290:112457. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jenvm an. 2021. Low YW, Yee KF (2021) A review on lignocellulosic biomass waste into biochar- 112457 derived catalyst: current conversion techniques, sustainable applica- Kamali M, Jahaninafard D, Mostafaie A, Davarazar M, Gomes APD, Tarelho LAC, tions and challenges. Biomass Bioenerg 154:106245. https:// doi. org/ 10. Dewil R, Aminabhavi TM (2020) Scientometric analysis and scien-1016/j. biomb ioe. 2021. 106245 tific trends on biochar application as soil amendment. Chem Eng J Lu H, Chen XH, Mo CH, Huang YH, He MY, Li YW, Feng NX, Katsoyiannis A, Cai 395:125128. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. cej. 2020. 125128 QY (2021) Occurrence and dissipation mechanism of organic pollutants Khan Z, Khan MN, Zhang K, Luo T, Zhu K, Hu L (2021) The application of during the composting of sewage sludge: a critical review. Bioresour biochar alleviated the adverse effects of drought on the growth, physi- Technol 328:124847. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2021. 124847 ology, yield and quality of rapeseed through regulation of soil status Lyu H, He Y, Tang J, Hecker M, Liu Q, Jones PD, Codling G, Giesy JP (2016) Eec ff t and nutrients availability. Ind Crop Prod 171:113878. https:// doi. org/ 10. of pyrolysis temperature on potential toxicity of biochar if applied to 1016/j. indcr op. 2021. 113878 the environment. Environ Pollut 218:1–7. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. Kim YJ, Hyun J, Yoo SY, Yoo G (2021) The role of biochar in alleviating soil envpol. 2016. 08. 014 drought stress in urban roadside greenery. Geoderma 404:115223. Ma Q, Chen W, Jin Z, Chen L, Zhou Q, Jiang X (2021) One-step synthesis of https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. geode rma. 2021. 115223 microporous nitrogen-doped biochar for efficient removal of CO and Kostas ET, Durán-Jiménez G, Shepherd BJ, Meredith W, Stevens LA, Williams H S. Fuel 289:119932. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. fuel. 2020. 119932 OSA, Lye GJ, Robinson JP (2020) Microwave pyrolysis of olive pomace Malyan SK, Kumar SS, Fagodiya RK, Ghosh P, Kumar A, Singh R, Singh L (2021) for bio-oil and bio-char production. Chem Eng J 387:123404. https:// Biochar for environmental sustainability in the energy-water-agroeco- doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. cej. 2019. 123404 system nexus. Renew Sust Energ Rev 149:111379. https:// doi. org/ 10. Lehmann J, Cowie A, Masiello CA, Kammann C, Woolf D, Amonette JE, 1016/j. rser. 2021. 111379 Cayuela ML, Camps-Arbestain M, Whitman T (2021) Biochar in climate Mannan MA, Mia S, Halder E, Dijkstra FA (2021) Biochar application rate does change mitigation. Nat Geosci 14:883–892. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ not improve plant water availability in soybean under drought stress. s41561- 021- 00852-8 Agr Water Manage 253:106940. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. agwat. 2021. Leppäkoski L, Marttila MP, Uusitalo V, Levänen J, Halonen V, Mikkilä MH (2021) 106940 Assessing the carbon footprint of biochar from willow grown on Mansoor S, Kour N, Manhas S, Zahid S, Wani OA, Sharma V, Wijaya L, Alyemeni marginal lands in Finland. Sustainability. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ su131 MN, Alsahli AA, El-Serehy HA, Paray BA, Ahmad P (2021) Biochar as a 810097 tool for effective management of drought and heavy metal toxicity. Li C, Bair DA, Parikh SJ (2018) Estimating potential dust emissions from biochar Chemosphere 271:129458. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. chemo sphere. amended soils under simulated tillage. Sci Total Environ 625:1093–1101. 2020. 129458 https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2017. 12. 249 Manya JJ (2012) Pyrolysis for biochar purposes: a review to establish current Li Q, Long R, Chen H, Chen F, Wang J (2020) Visualized analysis of global green knowledge gaps and research needs. Environ Sci Technol 46:7939– buildings: development, barriers and future directions. J Clean Prod 7954. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ es301 029g 245:118775. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jclep ro. 2019. 118775 Mazhar SH, Li X, Rashid A, Su J, Xu J, Brejnrod AD, Su JQ, Wu Y, Zhu YG, Zhou Lian F, Xing B (2017) Black carbon (Biochar) in water/soil environments: SG, Feng R, Rensing C (2021) Co-selection of antibiotic resistance molecular structure, sorption, stability, and potential risk. Environ Sci genes, and mobile genetic elements in the presence of heavy metals Technol 51:13517–13532. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acs. est. 7b025 28 Wu  et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 19 of 21 in poultry farm environments. Sci Total Environ 755:142702. https:// doi. Shafawi AN, Mohamed AR, Lahijani P, Mohammadi M (2021) Recent advances org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2020. 142702 in developing engineered biochar for C O capture: an insight into Mazhkoo S, Dadfar H, HajiHashemi M, Pourali O (2021) A comprehensive the biochar modification approaches. J Environ Chem Eng 9:106869. experimental and modeling investigation of walnut shell gasification https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jece. 2021. 106869 process in a pilot-scale downdraft gasifier integrated with an internal Shan G, Li W, Gao Y, Tan W, Xi B (2021) Additives for reducing nitrogen loss dur- combustion engine. Energ Convers Manage 231:113836. https:// doi. ing composting: a review. J Clean Prod 307:127308. https:// doi. org/ 10. org/ 10. 1016/j. encon man. 2021. 1138361016/j. jclep ro. 2021. 127308 Nan Q, Xin L, Qin Y, Waqas M, Wu W (2021) Exploring long-term effects of Shen Y, Yu Y, Zhang Y, Urgun-Demirtas M, Yuan H, Zhu N, Dai X (2021) Role of biochar on mitigating methane emissions from paddy soil: a review. redox-active biochar with distinctive electrochemical properties to pro- Biochar 3:125–134. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s42773- 021- 00096-0 mote methane production in anaerobic digestion of waste activated Nazir MH, Ayoub M, Zahid I, Shamsuddin RB, Yusup S, Ameen M, Zulqarnain sludge. J Clean Prod 278:123212. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jclep ro. 2020. QMU (2021) Development of lignin based heterogeneous solid acid 123212 catalyst derived from sugarcane bagasse for microwave assisted- Shi Z, Campanaro S, Usman M, Treu L, Basile A, Angelidaki I, Zhang S, Luo G transesterification of waste cooking oil. Biomass Bioenerg 146:105978. (2021) Genome-centric metatranscriptomics analysis reveals the role of https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biomb ioe. 2021. 105978 hydrochar in anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. Environ Sci Nidheesh PV, Gopinath A, Ranjith N, Praveen Akre A, Sreedharan V, Suresh Technol 55:8351–8361. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acs. est. 1c019 95 Kumar M (2021) Potential role of biochar in advanced oxidation Shi Z, Usman M, He J, Chen H, Zhang S, Luo G (2021b) Combined microbial processes: a sustainable approach. Chem Eng J 405:126582. https:// doi. transcript and metabolic analysis reveals the different roles of hydro - org/ 10. 1016/j. cej. 2020. 126582 char and biochar in promoting anaerobic digestion of waste activated Oleszczuk P, Koltowski M (2018) Changes of total and freely dissolved polycy- sludge. Water Res 205:117679. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. watres. 2021. clic aromatic hydrocarbons and toxicity of biochars treated with various 117679 aging processes. Environ Pollut 237:65–73. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. Shin J, Park D, Hong S, Jeong C, Kim H, Chung W (2021) Influence of activated envpol. 2018. 01. 073 biochar pellet fertilizer application on greenhouse gas emissions and Purkayastha D, Mishra U, Biswas S (2014) A comprehensive review on Cd(II) carbon sequestration in rice (Oryza sativa L.) production. Environ Pollut removal from aqueous solution. J Water Process Eng 2:105–128. https:// 285:117457. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. envpol. 2021. 117457 doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jwpe. 2014. 05. 009 Singh G, Mavi MS, Choudhary OP, Gupta N, Singh Y (2021) Rice straw biochar Qi C, Wang R, Jia S, Chen J, Li Y, Zhang J, Li G, Luo W (2021a) Biochar amend- application to soil irrigated with saline water in a cotton-wheat system ment to advance contaminant removal in anaerobic digestion of improves crop performance and soil functionality in north-west India. organic solid wastes: a review. Bioresource Technol 341:125827. https:// J Environ Manage 295:113277. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jenvm an. 2021. doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2021. 125827 113277 Qi L, Ma Z, Chang SX, Zhou P, Huang R, Wang Y, Wang Z, Gao M (2021b) Song C, Zhao Y, Pan D, Wang S, Wu D, Wang L, Hao J, Wei Z (2021) Heavy Biochar decreases methanogenic archaea abundance and methane metals passivation driven by the interaction of organic fractions emissions in a flooded paddy soil. Sci Total Environ 752:141958. https:// and functional bacteria during biochar/montmorillonite-amended doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2020. 141958 composting. Bioresource Technol 329:124923. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. Qi Q, Sun C, Zhang J, He Y, Wah Tong Y (2021c) Internal enhancement biort ech. 2021. 124923 mechanism of biochar with graphene structure in anaerobic digestion: Su C, Tao A, Zhao L, Wang P, Wang A, Huang X, Chen M (2021) Roles of modi- the bioavailability of trace elements and potential direct interspecies fied biochar in the performance, sludge characteristics, and microbial electron transfer. Chem Eng J 406:126833. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. cej. community features of anaerobic reactor for treatment food waste. 2020. 126833 Sci Total Environ 770:144668. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2020. Qi QX, Sun C, Cristhian C, Zhang TY, Zhang JX, Tian HL, He YL, Tong YW (2021d) 144668 Enhancement of methanogenic performance by gasification biochar Sugiarto Y, Sunyoto NMS, Zhu M, Jones I, Zhang D (2021) Eec ff t of biochar in on anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technol 330:124993. https:// doi. enhancing hydrogen production by mesophilic anaerobic digestion of org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2021. 124993 food wastes: the role of minerals. Int J Hydrogen Energ 46:3695–3703. Qiu X, Zhou G, Wang H, Wu X (2021) The behavior of antibiotic-resistance https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ijhyd ene. 2020. 10. 256 genes and their relationships with the bacterial community and heavy Sugiarto Y, Sunyoto NMS, Zhu M, Jones I, Zhang D (2021a) Eec ff t of biochar metals during sewage sludge composting. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf addition on microbial community and methane production during 216:112190. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ecoenv. 2021. 112190 anaerobic digestion of food wastes: The role of minerals in biochar. Rai PK, Lee SS, Zhang M, Tsang YF, Kim KH (2019) Heavy metals in food Bioresour Technol 323:124585. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2020. crops: health risks, fate, mechanisms, and management. Environ Int 124585 125:365–385. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. envint. 2019. 01. 067 Sun R, Wang J, Peng Y, Wang H, Chen Q (2021) Mitigation of arsenic accumula- Reay DS, Davidson EA, Smith KA, Smith P, Melillo JM, Dentener F, Crutzen PJ tion in arugula (Eruca sativa Mill.) using Fe/Al/Zn impregnated biochar (2012) Global agriculture and nitrous oxide emissions. Nat Clim Change composites. Environ Sci Pollut R 28:4136–4146. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ 2:410–416. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ nclim ate14 58s11356- 020- 10476-x Ren MN, Yu XJ, Mujumdar AS, Yagoub AA, Chen L, Zhou CS (2021) Visualizing Sun H, Sun S, Feng D, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Wu J, Qin Y (2021a) Mecha- the knowledge domain of pulsed light technology in the food field: a nism of coke formation and corresponding gas fraction characteristics scientometrics review. Innov Food Sci Emerg 74:102823. https:// doi. in biochar-catalyzed tar reforming during corn straw pyrolysis. Fuel Pro- org/ 10. 1016/j. ifset. 2021. 102823 cess Technol 221:106903. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. fuproc. 2021. 106903 Reynel-Ávila HE, Camacho-Aguilar KI, Bonilla-Petriciolet A, Mendoza-Castillo DI, Sun T, Xu Y, Sun Y, Wang L, Liang X, Zheng S (2021c) Cd immobilization and soil González-Ponce HA, Trejo-Valencia R, Azevedo DCS (2021) Engineered quality under Fe-modified biochar in weakly alkaline soil. Chemosphere magnetic carbon-based adsorbents for the removal of water priority 280:130606. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. chemo sphere. 2021. 130606 pollutants: an overview. Adsorpt Sci Technol 2021:1–41. https:// doi. org/ Tian H, Yang J, Xu R, Lu C, Canadell JG, Davidson EA, Jackson RB, Arneth A, 10. 1155/ 2021/ 99174 44 Chang J, Ciais P, Gerber S, Ito A, Joos F, Lienert S et al (2019) Global soil SafahaniLangeroodi AR, Mancinelli R, Radicetti E (2021) Contribution of nitrous oxide emissions since the preindustrial era estimated by an biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to sustainable cultivation of ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models: magnitude, attribution, and sunflower under semi-arid environment. Field Crop Res 273:108292. uncertainty. Glob Chang Biol 25:640–659. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ gcb. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. fcr. 2021. 108292 14514 Shabbir A, Saqib M, Murtaza G, Abbas G, Imran M, Rizwan M, Naeem MA, Tomczyk B, Siatecka A, Gao Y, Ok YS, Bogusz A, Oleszczuk P (2020) The conver- Ali S, Rashad Javeed HM (2021) Biochar mitigates arsenic-induced tion of sewage sludge to biochar as a sustainable tool of PAHs exposure human health risks and phytotoxicity in quinoa under saline conditions reduction during agricultural utilization of sewage sludges. J Hazard by modulating ionic and oxidative stress responses. Environ Pollut Mater 392:122416. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jhazm at. 2020. 122416 287:117348. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. envpol. 2021. 117348 Wu et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 20 of 21 Tong S, Zhang S, Yin H, Wang J, Chen M (2021) Study on co-hydrothermal Wu P, Wang ZY, Bolan NS, Wang HL, Wang YJ, Chen WF (2021) Visualizing treatment combined with pyrolysis of rice straw/sewage sludge: the development trend and research frontiers of biochar in 2020: a biochar properties and heavy metals behavior. J Anal Appl Pyrol scientometric perspective. Biochar 3:419–436. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ 155:105074. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jaap. 2021. 105074s42773- 021- 00120-3 Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Morris S, Chan KY, Downie A, Rust J, Joseph S, Cowie Wu Y, Liu J, Shaaban M, Hu R (2021b) Dynamics of soil N O emissions and A (2009) Eec ff ts of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste functional gene abundance in response to biochar application in the on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant Soil 327:235–246. presence of earthworms. Environ Pollut 268:115670. https:// doi. org/ 10. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11104- 009- 0050-x1016/j. envpol. 2020. 115670 Wang C, Wang Y, Herath HMSK (2017) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) Xiao X, Chen B, Chen Z, Zhu L, Schnoor JL (2018) Insight into multiple and in biochar—their formation, occurrence and analysis: a review. Org multilevel structures of biochars and their potential environmental Geochem 114:1–11. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. orgge ochem. 2017. 09. 001 applications: a critical review. Environ Sci Technol 52:5027–5047. Wang X, Li C, Li Z, Yu G, Wang Y (2019) Eec ff t of pyrolysis temperature on https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acs. est. 7b064 87 characteristics, chemical speciation and risk evaluation of heavy metals Xiong Q, Wu X, Lv H, Liu S, Hou H, Wu X (2021) Influence of rice husk addition in biochar derived from textile dyeing sludge. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf on phosphorus fractions and heavy metals risk of biochar derived from 168:45–52. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ecoenv. 2018. 10. 022 sewage sludge. Chemosphere 280:130566. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. Wang J, Zhao Z, Zhang Y (2021a) Enhancing anaerobic digestion of kitchen chemo sphere. 2021. 130566 wastes with biochar: link between different properties and critical Xu Z, He M, Xu X, Cao X, Tsang DCW (2021) Impacts of different activation mechanisms of promoting interspecies electron transfer. Renew Energ processes on the carbon stability of biochar for oxidation resistance. 167:791–799. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. renene. 2020. 11. 153 Bioresour Technol 338:125555. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2021. Wang M, Zhao Z, Zhang Y (2021b) Magnetite-contained biochar derived 125555 from fenton sludge modulated electron transfer of microorganisms Yang J, Pan B, Li H, Liao SH, Zhang D, Wu M, Xing BS (2016) Degradation of in anaerobic digestion. J Hazard Mater 403:123972. https:// doi. org/ 10. p-Nitrophenol on biochars: role of persistent free radicals. Environ Sci 1016/j. jhazm at. 2020. 123972 Technol 50:694–700. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acs. est. 5b040 42 Wang SP, Wang L, Sun ZY, Wang ST, Shen CH, Tang YQ, Kida K (2021c) Biochar Yang X, Ng W, Wong BSE, Baeg GH, Wang CH, Ok YS (2019) Characterization addition reduces nitrogen loss and accelerates composting process by and ecotoxicological investigation of biochar produced via slow pyroly- affecting the core microbial community during distilled grain waste sis: effect of feedstock composition and pyrolysis conditions. J Hazard composting. Bioresour Technol 337:125492. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. Mater 365:178–185. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jhazm at. 2018. 10. 047 biort ech. 2021. 125492 Yang Q, Zhou H, Bartocci P, Fantozzi F, Masek O, Agblevor FA, Wei Z, Yang Wang X, Chang VW, Li Z, Chen Z, Wang Y (2021d) Co-pyrolysis of sewage H, Chen H, Lu X, Chen G, Zheng C, Nielsen CP, McElroy MB (2021) sludge and organic fractions of municipal solid waste: synergistic Prospective contributions of biomass pyrolysis to China’s 2050 carbon effects on biochar properties and the environmental risk of heavy reduction and renewable energy goals. Nat Commun 12:1698. https:// metals. J Hazard Mater 412:125200. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jhazm at. doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41467- 021- 21868-z 2021. 125200 Yang D, Yang S, Wang L, Xu J, Liu X (2021a) Performance of biochar-supported Wang Y, Akdeniz N, Yi S (2021e) Biochar-amended poultry mortality compost- nanoscale zero-valent iron for cadmium and arsenic co-contaminated ing to increase compost temperatures, reduce ammonia emissions, soil remediation: insights on availability, bioaccumulation and health and decrease leachate’s chemical oxygen demand. Agr Ecosyst Environ risk. Environ Pollut 290:118054. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. envpol. 2021. 315:107451. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. agee. 2021. 107451 118054 Wang Z, Shen R, Ji S, Xie L, Zhang H (2021f ) Eec ff ts of biochar derived from Yang D, Yang S, Yuan H, Wang F, Wang H, Xu J, Liu X (2021b) Co-benefits of sewage sludge and sewage sludge/cotton stalks on the immobiliza- biochar-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron in simultaneously sta- tion and phytoavailability of Pb, Cu, and Zn in sandy loam soil. J Hazard bilizing soil heavy metals and reducing their bioaccessibility. J Hazard Mater 419:126468. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jhazm at. 2021. 126468 Mater 418:126292. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jhazm at. 2021. 126292 Wang Z, Tian Q, Guo J, Wu R, Zhu H, Zhang H (2021g) Co-pyrolysis of sewage Yang F, Du Q, Sui L, Cheng K (2021c) One-step fabrication of artificial humic sludge/cotton stalks with K CO for biochar production: improved acid-functionalized colloid-like magnetic biochar for rapid heavy metal 2 3 biochar porosity and reduced heavy metal leaching. Waste Manag removal. Bioresour Technol 328:124825. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort 135:199–207. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. wasman. 2021. 08. 042ech. 2021. 124825 Weidemann E, Buss W, Edo M, Masek O, Jansson S (2018) Influence of Yang Q, Mašek O, Zhao L, Nan H, Yu S, Yin J, Li Z, Cao X (2021d) Country-level pyrolysis temperature and production unit on formation of selected potential of carbon sequestration and environmental benefits by utiliz- PAHs, oxy-PAHs, N-PACs, PCDDs, and PCDFs in biochar—a screening ing crop residues for biochar implementation. Appl Energ 282:116275. study. Environ Sci Pollut R 25:3933–3940. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. apene rgy. 2020. 116275 s11356- 017- 0612-z Yang S, Chen Z, Wen Q (2021f ) Impacts of biochar on anaerobic digestion Wen E, Yang X, Chen H, Shaheen SM, Sarkar B, Xu S, Song H, Liang Y, Rinklebe of swine manure: methanogenesis and antibiotic resistance genes J, Hou D, Li Y, Wu F, Pohorely M, Wong JWC et al (2021) Iron-modified dissemination. Bioresour Technol 324:124679. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biochar and water management regime-induced changes in plant biort ech. 2021. 124679 growth, enzyme activities, and phytoavailability of arsenic, cadmium Yang T, Xu Y, Huang Q, Sun Y, Liang X, Wang L, Qin X, Zhao L (2021g) An and lead in a paddy soil. J Hazard Mater 407:124344. https:// doi. org/ 10. efficient biochar synthesized by iron-zinc modified corn straw for simul- 1016/j. jhazm at. 2020. 124344 taneously immobilization Cd in acidic and alkaline soils. Environ Pollut Woolf D, Amonette JE, Street-Perrott FA, Lehmann J, Joseph S (2010) Sustain- 291:118129. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. envpol. 2021. 118129 able biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nat Commun. https:// Yang Z, Sun T, Kleindienst S, Straub D, Kretzschmar R, Angenent LT, Kappler A doi. org/ 10. 1038/ ncomm s1053 (2021h) A coupled function of biochar as geobattery and geoconduc- Woolf D, Lehmann J, Ogle S, Kishimoto-Mo AW, McConkey B, Baldock J (2021) tor leads to stimulation of microbial Fe(III) reduction and methanogen- Greenhouse gas inventory model for biochar additions to soil. Environ esis in a paddy soil enrichment culture. Soil Biol Biochem 163:108446. Sci Technol 55:14795–14805. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acs. est. 1c024 25https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. soilb io. 2021. 108446 Wu P, Ata-Ul-Karim ST, Singh BP, Wang HL, Wu TL, Liu C, Fang GD, Zhou DM, Yin Y, Yang C, Li M, Zheng Y, Ge C, Gu J, Li H, Duan M, Wang X, Chen R (2021) Wang YJ, Chen WF (2019) A scientometric review of biochar research Research progress and prospects for using biochar to mitigate green- in the past 20 years (1998–2018). Biochar 1:23–43. https:// doi. org/ 10. house gas emissions during composting: a review. Sci Total Environ 1007/ s42773- 019- 00002-9 798:149294. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2021. 149294 Wu P, Wang Z, Wang H, Bolan NS, Wang Y, Chen W (2020) Visualizing the Yu Q, Sun C, Liu R, Yellezuome D, Zhu X, Bai R, Liu M, Sun M (2021) Anaerobic emerging trends of biochar research and applications in 2019: a sci- co-digestion of corn stover and chicken manure using continuous entometric analysis and review. Biochar 2:135–150. https:// doi. org/ 10. stirred tank reactor: the effect of biochar addition and urea pretreat - 1007/ s42773- 020- 00055-1 ment. Bioresour Technol 319:124197. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2020. 124197 Wu  et al. Biochar (2023) 5:6 Page 21 of 21 Yuan D, Yuan H, He X, Hu H, Qin S, Clough T, Wrage-Mönnig N, Luo J, He X, biochar-supported zerovalent iron. Chemosphere 263:127871. https:// Chen M, Zhou S (2021) Identification and verification of key func-doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. chemo sphere. 2020. 127871 tional groups of biochar influencing soil N O emission. Biol Fert Soils Zhou S, Wen X, Cao Z, Cheng R, Qian Y, Mi J, Wang Y, Liao X, Ma B, Zou Y, Wu 57:447–456. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00374- 021- 01541-9 Y (2021c) Modified cornstalk biochar can reduce ammonia emis- Zailan Z, Tahir M, Jusoh M, Zakaria ZY (2021) A review of sulfonic group bear- sions from compost by increasing the number of ammonia-oxidizing ing porous carbon catalyst for biodiesel production. Renew Energ bacteria and decreasing urease activity. Bioresour Technol 319:124120. 175:430–452. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. renene. 2021. 05. 030https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2020. 124120 Zhang M, Wang Y (2021) Impact of biochar supported nano zero-valent iron Zhou Z, Li Z, Zhang Z, You L, Xu L, Huang H, Wang X, Gao Y, Cui X (2021d) on anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste: methane Treatment of the saline-alkali soil with acidic corn stalk biochar and its production, performance stability and microbial community structure. effect on the sorghum yield in western Songnen Plain. Sci Total Environ Bioresour Technol 340:125715. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2021. 797:149190. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2021. 149190 125715 Zhu H, Yang J, Yao R, Wang X, Xie W, Zhu W, Liu X, Cao Y, Tao J (2020) Interac- Zhang P, Zhang X, Li Y, Han L (2020) Influence of pyrolysis temperature tive effects of soil amendments (biochar and gypsum) and salinity on chemical speciation, leaching ability, and environmental risk of on ammonia volatilization in coastal saline soil. CATENA 190:104527. heavy metals in biochar derived from cow manure. Bioresour Technol https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. catena. 2020. 104527 302:122850. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2020. 122850 Zhuang M, Wang H, Qi L, Cui L, Quan G, Yan J (2021) Production of activated Zhang F, Wei Z, Wang JJ (2021a) Integrated application effects of biochar biochar via a self-blowing strategy-supported sulfidated nanoscale and plant residue on ammonia loss, heavy metal immobilization, and zerovalent iron with enhanced reactivity and stability for Cr( VI) reduc- estrogen dissipation during the composting of poultry manure. Waste tion. J Clean Prod 315:128108. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jclep ro. 2021. Manag 131:117–125. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. wasman. 2021. 05. 037 128108 Zhang J, Cui Y, Zhang T, Hu Q, Wah Tong Y, He Y, Dai Y, Wang CH, Peng Y (2021b) Food waste treating by biochar-assisted high-solid anaerobic digestion coupled with steam gasification: enhanced bioenergy gen- eration and porous biochar production. Bioresour Technol 331:125051. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2021. 125051 Zhang Q, Wu Z, Zhang X, Duan P, Shen H, Gunina A, Yan X, Xiong Z (2021c) Biochar amendment mitigated N O emissions from paddy field during the wheat growing season. Environ Pollut 281:117026. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. envpol. 2021. 117026 Zhang Q, Zeng L, Fu X, Pan F, Shi X, Wang T (2021d) Comparison of anaero- bic co-digestion of pig manure and sludge at different mixing ratios at thermophilic and mesophilic temperatures. Bioresour Technol 337:125425. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2021. 125425 Zhang Q, Zhang X, Duan P, Jiang X, Shen H, Yan X, Xiong Z (2021e) The effect of long-term biochar amendment on N2O emissions: experiments with N(15)-O(18) isotopes combined with specific inhibition approaches. Sci Total Environ 769:144533. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2020. Zhang X, Xie H, Liu X, Kong D, Zhang S, Wang C (2021f ) A novel green substrate made by sludge digestate and its biochar: plant growth and greenhouse emission. Sci Total Environ 797:149194. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. scito tenv. 2021. 149194 Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Chen Y (2021g) Biochar mitigates N O emission of microbial denitrification through modulating carbon metabolism and allocation of reducing power. Environ Sci Technol 55:8068–8078. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acs. est. 1c019 76 Zhang X, Yang X, Yuan X, Tian S, Wang X, Zhang H, Han L (2022) Eec ff t of pyrolysis temperature on composition, carbon fraction and abiotic stability of straw biochars: correlation and quantitative analysis. Carbon Res 1:00017. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s44246- 022- 00017-1 Zhao Q, Wang Y, Xu Z, Yu Z (2021) How does biochar amendment affect soil methane oxidation? A review. J Soil Sediment 21:1575–1586. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11368- 021- 02889-z Zhao Q, Xu T, Song X, Nie S, Choi SE, Si C (2021b) Preparation and application in water treatment of magnetic biochar. Front Bioeng Biotech 9:769667. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3389/ fbioe. 2021. 769667 Zhao Z, Cao Y, Li S, Zhang Y (2021c) Eec ff ts of biowaste-derived biochar on the electron transport efficiency during anaerobic acid orange 7 removal. Bioresour Technol 320:124295. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. biort ech. 2020. Zhen Y, Zhu S, Sun Z, Tian Y, Li Z, Yang C, Ma J (2021) Identifying the persistent free radicals (PFRs) formed as crucial metastable intermediates during peroxymonosulfate (PMS) activation by N-Doped carbonaceous materi- als. Environ Sci Technol 55:9293–9304. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acs. est. 1c019 74 Zhou G, Qiu X, Wu X, Lu S (2021a) Horizontal gene transfer is a key determi- nant of antibiotic resistance genes profiles during chicken manure composting with the addition of biochar and zeolite. J Hazard Mater 408:124883. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jhazm at. 2020. 124883 Zhou M, Yang X, Sun R, Wang X, Yin W, Wang S, Wang J (2021b) The contribu- tion of lignocellulosic constituents to Cr( VI) reduction capacity of

Journal

BiocharSpringer Journals

Published: Jan 18, 2023

Keywords: Bibliometric analysis; Citespace; Research hotspots; Toxic metal immobilization; Sustainable application

References