Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/committing-fallacies-and-the-appearance-condition-ZIbdPIw80m
References (41)
-
L. McIntyre (2021)
How to Talk to a Science Denier -
(Aristotle. 1928. Topics. In The works of Aristotle translated into English, vol 1 (trans: Pickard-Cambridge, W.A.). London: Oxford University Press.)
Aristotle. 1928. Topics. In The works of Aristotle translated into English, vol 1 (trans: Pickard-Cambridge, W.A.). London: Oxford University Press.Aristotle. 1928. Topics. In The works of Aristotle translated into English, vol 1 (trans: Pickard-Cambridge, W.A.). London: Oxford University Press., Aristotle. 1928. Topics. In The works of Aristotle translated into English, vol 1 (trans: Pickard-Cambridge, W.A.). London: Oxford University Press.
-
Frans Eemeren (2010)
Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation -
(1974)
vols. VII-VIII, ed -
(Bacon, Francis. 1620/2000. The new organon, eds. L. Jardine and M. Silverthorne, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.)
Bacon, Francis. 1620/2000. The new organon, eds. L. Jardine and M. Silverthorne, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Bacon, Francis. 1620/2000. The new organon, eds. L. Jardine and M. Silverthorne, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., Bacon, Francis. 1620/2000. The new organon, eds. L. Jardine and M. Silverthorne, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
James Burnham, P. Wheelwright (1932)
Introduction to philosophical analysis -
(1955)
/56. Seeing and seeing as -
(Aristotle. Nichomachean Ethics. Many translations.)
Aristotle. Nichomachean Ethics. Many translations.Aristotle. Nichomachean Ethics. Many translations., Aristotle. Nichomachean Ethics. Many translations.
-
(Mill, John Stuart. 1843. A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive. In The collected works of John Stuart Mill, vols. VII-VIII, ed. J.M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1974)
Mill, John Stuart. 1843. A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive. In The collected works of John Stuart Mill, vols. VII-VIII, ed. J.M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1974Mill, John Stuart. 1843. A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive. In The collected works of John Stuart Mill, vols. VII-VIII, ed. J.M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1974, Mill, John Stuart. 1843. A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive. In The collected works of John Stuart Mill, vols. VII-VIII, ed. J.M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1974
-
Bertha Manninen (2018)
EquivocationHard Choices, Easy Answers
-
S. Reynolds (2000)
The argument from illusionNoûs, 34
-
(1928)
Sophistical refutations -
(Braine, David. 2021. ‘Hovering ship’ photographed off UK coast in rare optical illusion. https://globalnews.ca/news/7679642/floating-ship-optical-illusion-superior-mirage/. Accessed April 7, 2021.)
Braine, David. 2021. ‘Hovering ship’ photographed off UK coast in rare optical illusion. https://globalnews.ca/news/7679642/floating-ship-optical-illusion-superior-mirage/. Accessed April 7, 2021.Braine, David. 2021. ‘Hovering ship’ photographed off UK coast in rare optical illusion. https://globalnews.ca/news/7679642/floating-ship-optical-illusion-superior-mirage/. Accessed April 7, 2021., Braine, David. 2021. ‘Hovering ship’ photographed off UK coast in rare optical illusion. https://globalnews.ca/news/7679642/floating-ship-optical-illusion-superior-mirage/. Accessed April 7, 2021.
-
(NASA Science. 2020. The moon illusion: Why does the moon look so big sometimes. https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/1191/the-moon-illusion-why-does-the-moon-look-so-big-sometimes/ [audio, accessed 2021 04 22])
NASA Science. 2020. The moon illusion: Why does the moon look so big sometimes. https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/1191/the-moon-illusion-why-does-the-moon-look-so-big-sometimes/ [audio, accessed 2021 04 22]NASA Science. 2020. The moon illusion: Why does the moon look so big sometimes. https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/1191/the-moon-illusion-why-does-the-moon-look-so-big-sometimes/ [audio, accessed 2021 04 22], NASA Science. 2020. The moon illusion: Why does the moon look so big sometimes. https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/1191/the-moon-illusion-why-does-the-moon-look-so-big-sometimes/ [audio, accessed 2021 04 22]
-
C. Tindale (2020)
The Anthropology of Argument -
(2021)
Hovering ship’ photographed off UK coast in rare optical illusion -
(Moore, G. E. 1921. What is philosophy? In Some main problems of philosophy. London: George Allen and Unwin )
Moore, G. E. 1921. What is philosophy? In Some main problems of philosophy. London: George Allen and UnwinMoore, G. E. 1921. What is philosophy? In Some main problems of philosophy. London: George Allen and Unwin , Moore, G. E. 1921. What is philosophy? In Some main problems of philosophy. London: George Allen and Unwin
-
C. Novaes (2020)
The Role of Trust in ArgumentationInformal Logic
-
Ralph Johnson (1987)
The blaze of her splendors: Suggestions about revitalizing fallacy theoryArgumentation, 1
-
(Vesey, G.N.A. 1955/56. Seeing and seeing as. In Perceiving, sensing and knowing, ed. R.J. Swartz, 68–83. New York: Doubleday, 1965.)
Vesey, G.N.A. 1955/56. Seeing and seeing as. In Perceiving, sensing and knowing, ed. R.J. Swartz, 68–83. New York: Doubleday, 1965.Vesey, G.N.A. 1955/56. Seeing and seeing as. In Perceiving, sensing and knowing, ed. R.J. Swartz, 68–83. New York: Doubleday, 1965., Vesey, G.N.A. 1955/56. Seeing and seeing as. In Perceiving, sensing and knowing, ed. R.J. Swartz, 68–83. New York: Doubleday, 1965.
-
P. Madigan (2020)
The Murder of Professor Schlick: The Rise and Fall of the Vienna Circle. By DavidEdmonds. Pp. xiv, 313, Princeton/London, Princeton University Press, 2020, $25.16.The Heythrop Journal
-
F. Eemeren (2018)
Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective -
(Aristotle. 1954. Rhetoric. Trans. W. Rhys Roberts. New York: Modern Library.)
Aristotle. 1954. Rhetoric. Trans. W. Rhys Roberts. New York: Modern Library.Aristotle. 1954. Rhetoric. Trans. W. Rhys Roberts. New York: Modern Library., Aristotle. 1954. Rhetoric. Trans. W. Rhys Roberts. New York: Modern Library.
-
The moon illusion : Why does the moon look so big sometimes -
J. Mill (2009)
A System Of Logic Ratiocinative And Inductive Vol 1 of 2 -
(2020)
Give the standard treatment of fallacies a chance! Cognitive and rhetorical insights into fallacy processingFrom argument schemes to argumentative relations in the wild
-
R. Gregory (1969)
Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing -
(1987)
Perception : Cultural differences -
D. Walton (2010)
Why Fallacies Appear to Be Better Arguments than They AreLogic & Philosophy of Mathematics eJournal
-
D. Walton, E. Krabbe (1995)
Commitment In Dialogue -
K. Michaelian (2017)
A Critical Introduction to TestimonyThe Philosophical Quarterly, 67
-
Committing Fallacies and the Appearance Condition -
S. Oswald, Thierry Herman (2019)
Give the Standard Treatment of Fallacies a Chance! Cognitive and Rhetorical Insights into Fallacy ProcessingArgumentation Library
-
(Aristotle. 1928. Sophistical refutations. W.A. Pickard-Cambridge (trans). In The works of Aristotle translated into English, vol 1. London: Oxford University Press.)
Aristotle. 1928. Sophistical refutations. W.A. Pickard-Cambridge (trans). In The works of Aristotle translated into English, vol 1. London: Oxford University Press.Aristotle. 1928. Sophistical refutations. W.A. Pickard-Cambridge (trans). In The works of Aristotle translated into English, vol 1. London: Oxford University Press., Aristotle. 1928. Sophistical refutations. W.A. Pickard-Cambridge (trans). In The works of Aristotle translated into English, vol 1. London: Oxford University Press.
-
Ruth Chambers (1973)
TopicsCommunity College Review, 1
-
(Whately, Richard. 1846. Elements of rhetoric. Edited by Douglas Ehninger. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.)
Whately, Richard. 1846. Elements of rhetoric. Edited by Douglas Ehninger. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Whately, Richard. 1846. Elements of rhetoric. Edited by Douglas Ehninger. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press., Whately, Richard. 1846. Elements of rhetoric. Edited by Douglas Ehninger. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
-
(Ayer, A. J. 1940. The argument from illusion. In Perception and the external world, ed. R. J. Hirst, 128–34. New York: Macmillan, 1965.)
Ayer, A. J. 1940. The argument from illusion. In Perception and the external world, ed. R. J. Hirst, 128–34. New York: Macmillan, 1965.Ayer, A. J. 1940. The argument from illusion. In Perception and the external world, ed. R. J. Hirst, 128–34. New York: Macmillan, 1965., Ayer, A. J. 1940. The argument from illusion. In Perception and the external world, ed. R. J. Hirst, 128–34. New York: Macmillan, 1965.
-
F. Bacon, L. Jardine, M. Silverthorne (2008)
The New Organon -
新津 米造 (1956)
The elements of rhetoric -
A. Diemer (1964)
[WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY?].Die Medizinische Welt, 20
-
C. Tindale (2019)
An Introduction to the Study of Fallaciousness
- Publisher
- Springer Journals
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
- ISSN
- 0920-427X
- eISSN
- 1572-8374
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10503-023-09606-9
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
This appearance condition of fallacies refers to the phenomenon of weak arguments, or moves in argumentation, appearing to be okay when really they aren’t. Not all theorists agree that the appearance condition should be part of the conception of fallacies but this essay explores some of the consequences of including it. In particular, the differences between committing a fallacy, causing a fallacy and observing a fallacy are identified. The remainder of the paper is given over to discussing possible causes of mistakenly perceiving weak argumentation moves as okay. Among these are argument caused misperception, perspective caused misperception, discursive environment caused misperception and perceiver caused misperception. The discussion aims to be sufficiently general so that it can accommodate different models and standards of argumentation that make a place for fallacies.
Journal
Argumentation – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 1, 2023
Keywords: Fallacy; Appearance condition; Committing a fallacy; Causing a fallacy; Observing a fallacy; Aristotle; Perceiving that; Perceiving as; Argument caused misperception; Perspective caused misperception; Discursive environment caused misperception; Perceiver caused misperception; Francis Bacon