Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Although civil law and common law systems differ in their substantive law, and differ in the character of their institutions of law-making, law-interpretation, and law-application, they also differ in their methods of reasoning and in their use of authority. This chapter focuses on these differences in reasoning and treatment of authority. It does so, however, not so much as an end in itself, but as an entry into aspects of the thinking of Roscoe Pound. Pound, one of the founders of the discipline of sociology of law, was also profoundly interested in European law, comparative law, and legal classification more than any other American (and common law) legal theorist of the early and middle twentieth century. By looking at Pound’s interest in legal classification, including the classification of legal systems, through the lens of Pound’s own sociological interests, we can learn much about Pound and also about the similarities and differences between common law and civil law orders.]
Published: Jan 1, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.