Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[In this chapter, Matti Ilmari Niemi sets the stage for a novel approach to legal theory that captures the fundamental intuitions of natural law and positivist theories of law while fending off the core objections against them. Concerning natural law jurisprudence, Niemi argues that this approach properly captures that legal systems share many common values and protect human goods. However, mainstream natural law theorists are problematic because their principles either have a religious foundation or might appear as arbitrary. In turn, while legal positivism captures the factual dimensions of law, it fails to adequately capture the role that principles of morality and justice have in the interpretation of legal materials and the application of laws to specific cases. To overcome these issues, Niemi outlines the foundation of a view of law as an “expression of adopted justice.” In his view, this theory captures both the factual dimension of legal materials emphasized by positivists, while also describing the role of principles and substantive reasons in legal interpretation and the application of these materials.]
Published: Sep 2, 2021
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.