Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Convenience Voting and TechnologyEvaluating Voting Policy Success: Voter Satisfaction

Convenience Voting and Technology: Evaluating Voting Policy Success: Voter Satisfaction [As seen in Chapter 4, the ability of voting legislation to influence aggregate outcomes is somewhat limited. Although there appears to be improvement in Uniform and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA) ballot return rates and UOCAVA ballot acceptance rates after the implementation of the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment (MOVE) Act, military and overseas voter turnout remains low. However, public policy influences not only aggregate macro-level outcomes, but also micro-level individual variables. In contrast to Chapter 4, this chapter looks at the impact of public policy on the individual voter. How have voters responded to changes in the voting process? Are voters more satisfied with the process than in previous years? In this chapter, I use data from the Overseas Vote Foundation (OVF) 2008 and 2010 postelection voter surveys (whose methodology is described in detail in Chapter 2) to examine whether the implementation of electronic transmission methods in the MOVE Act impacted the individual’s perception of the voting process.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Convenience Voting and TechnologyEvaluating Voting Policy Success: Voter Satisfaction

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/convenience-voting-and-technology-evaluating-voting-policy-success-mofkBI6yni
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan US
Copyright
© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2014
ISBN
978-1-349-48546-8
Pages
93 –109
DOI
10.1057/9781137391070_5
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[As seen in Chapter 4, the ability of voting legislation to influence aggregate outcomes is somewhat limited. Although there appears to be improvement in Uniform and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA) ballot return rates and UOCAVA ballot acceptance rates after the implementation of the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment (MOVE) Act, military and overseas voter turnout remains low. However, public policy influences not only aggregate macro-level outcomes, but also micro-level individual variables. In contrast to Chapter 4, this chapter looks at the impact of public policy on the individual voter. How have voters responded to changes in the voting process? Are voters more satisfied with the process than in previous years? In this chapter, I use data from the Overseas Vote Foundation (OVF) 2008 and 2010 postelection voter surveys (whose methodology is described in detail in Chapter 2) to examine whether the implementation of electronic transmission methods in the MOVE Act impacted the individual’s perception of the voting process.]

Published: Oct 30, 2015

Keywords: Registration Process; Voter Turnout; Vote Process; Request Process; American Election

There are no references for this article.