Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Davis, Tracy Thompson (1994)
A Social Movement Perspective on Corporate ControlAdministrative Science Quarterly, 39
E. Fama (2007)
Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm Author ( s ) :
J. Sarkar, Subrata Sarkar (2000)
Large Shareholder Activism in Corporate Governance in Developing Countries: Evidence from IndiaInternational Review of Finance, 1
P Gompers, JL Ishi, A Metrick (2003)
Corporate governance and equity pricesQuarterly Journal of Economics, 118
T. Eisenberg, S. Sundgren, M. Wells (1998)
Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms 1 We wish to thank Asiakastieto Oy for fuJournal of Financial Economics
April Klein (1998)
Firm Performance and Board Committee Structure1The Journal of Law and Economics, 41
V Kamesam (2002)
Cooperative Banks in India: Strengthening through corporate governanceRBI Bulletin, LVI
GF Maassen (1999)
An International Comparison of Corporate Governance Models
Phani Bv, V. Reddy, N. Ramachandran, A. Bhattacharyya (2005)
Insider Ownership, Corporate Governance and Corporate PerformanceCorporate Finance: Governance
M. Jensen (1988)
Takeovers: Their Causes and ConsequencesCorporate Finance: Governance
M. Kohlbeck, Brian Mayhew (2004)
Related Party Transactions
JE Core, RW Holthausen, DF Larcker (1999)
Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performanceJournal of Financial Economics, 51
H. Skaife, D. Collins, Ryan LaFond (2004)
The Effects of Corporate Governance on Firms' Credit RatingsCorporate Finance: Capital Structure & Payout Policies eJournal
L. Lowenstein (1996)
Financial Transparency and Corporate Governance: You Manage What You MeasureColumbia Law Review, 96
I. Millstein, P. Macavoy (1998)
The Active Board of Directors and Improved Performance of the Large Publicly-Traded CorporationColumbia Law Review, 98
Michael Jensen, W. Meckling (1976)
Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control UnitLSN: Law & Finance: Empirical (Topic)
Anil Shivdasani, M. Zenner (2004)
Best Practices in Corporate Governance: What Two Decades of Research RevealsJournal of Applied Corporate Finance, 16
E. Fama, M. Jensen (1983)
Agency Problems and Residual ClaimsThe Journal of Law and Economics, 26
K John, LW Senbet (1998)
Corporate governance and board effectivenessJournal of Banking and Finance, 22
Anup Agrawal, C. Knoeber (1995)
Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and ShareholdersJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31
T Mitton (2002)
A cross-firm analysis of the impact of corporate governance on the East Asian financial crisisJournal of Financial Economics, 64
C. Campbell, Charles Wasley (1999)
Stock-based incentive contracts and managerial performance: the case of Ralston Purina CompanyJournal of Financial Economics, 51
A Shleifer, RW Vishny (1993)
CorruptionQuarterly Journal of Economics, 108
J Bédard, SM Chtourou, L Courteau (2004)
The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings managementAuditing, 23
Andrei Shleifer, Robert Vishny (1996)
A Survey of Corporate GovernanceOrganizations & Markets eJournal
H. Tehranian, Marcia Cornett, A. Marcus, A. Saunders (2006)
Earnings Management, Corporate Governance, and True Financial PerformanceFEN: Behavioral Finance (Topic)
MM Blair (1995)
Ownership and Control: Rethinking Corporate Governance of the Twenty-First Century
N. Vafeas (1999)
Board meeting frequency and firm performanceJournal of Financial Economics, 53
A Shleifer, RW Vishny (1997)
A Survey of corporate governanceThe Journal of Finance, 52
Kose John, Lemma Senbet (1997)
Corporate Governance and Board EffectivenessEntrepreneurship & Management eJournal
MC Jensen, WH Meckling (1976)
Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structureJournal of Financial Economics, 3
Angela Morgan, A. Poulsen (2001)
Linking pay to performance--compensation proposals in the S&P 500Journal of Financial Economics, 62
Stuart Rosenstein, Jeffrey Wyatt (1990)
Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth☆Journal of Financial Economics, 26
D. Hambrick (1987)
The Top Management Team: Key to Strategic SuccessCalifornia Management Review, 30
D Yermack (2003)
Renumeration, retention and reputation incentives for outside directorsThe Journal of Finance, 59
April Klein (2002)
Economic Determinants of Audit Committee IndependenceAccounting review: A quarterly journal of the American Accounting Association, 77
Sanjai Bhagat, Bernard Black (1998)
The Non-Correlation between Board Independence And Long-Term Firm PerformanceSPGMI: Compustat Fundamentals (Topic)
Karen Wruck (1989)
Equity ownership concentration and firm value: Evidence from private equity financingsJournal of Financial Economics, 23
KH Wruck (1989)
Equity ownership concentration and firm valueJournal of Financial Economics, 23
Lawrence Abbott, Susan Parker, Gary Peters (2004)
Audit Committee Characteristics and RestatementsEar and Hearing, 23
A. Demirguc-Kunt, R. Levine (1996)
Stock markets, corporate finance, and economic growth : an overviewThe World Bank Economic Review, 10
J. Core, Robert Holthausen, D. Larcker (1999)
Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance 1 The financial supJournal of Financial Economics
CM Jensen (1988)
Takeovers: Their causes and consequencesJournal of Economic Perspectives, 2
Diganta Mukherjee, T. Ghose (2004)
An analysis of corporate performance and governance in India: Study of some selected industries
D. Yermack (1996)
Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directorsJournal of Financial Economics, 40
M. Jensen (2001)
Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function*Business Ethics Quarterly, 12
Benjamin Hermalin, M. Weisbach (1998)
Endogenously Chosen Boards of Directors and Their Monitoring of the CEOThe American Economic Review, 88
D. Yermack (2002)
Remuneration, Retention, and Reputation Incentives for Outside DirectorsIO: Firm Structure
B Hall, J Liebman (1998)
Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113
M. Jensen (1993)
The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control SystemsCGA: Governance & Internal Control Systems (Topic)
S Bhagat, B Black (2002)
The non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performanceJournal of Corporation Law, 27
Todd Mitton (2002)
A Cross-Firm Analysis of the Impact of Corporate Governance on the East Asian Financial CrisisJournal of Financial Abstracts eJournal
R. Morck, Andrei Shleifer, Robert Vishny (1988)
Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical AnalysisJournal of Financial Economics, 20
Sanjai Bhagat, Andrei Shleifer, Robert Vishny (1990)
Hostile Takeovers in the 1980s: The Return to Corporate Specialization, 1990
AM Pettigrew (1992)
On studying management elitesStrategic Management Journal, 13
J Allen (2005)
Secretary General, ACGA at the SPARX Value Creation Roundtable
Sudipt Dutta (1997)
Family business in India
Rafael Porta, Florencio López‐de‐Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, Robert Vishny (1996)
Law and FinanceJournal of Political Economy, 106
A. Pettigrew (1992)
On studying managerial elitesSouthern Medical Journal, 13
MC Jensen (1993)
The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systemsJournal of Finance, 48
C. Himmelberg, R. Hubbard, Darius Palia, Anup Agrawal, George Baker, Sudipto Bhattacharya, Steve Bond, Charles Calomiris, Harold Demsetz, Rob Hansen, Laurie Hodrick, Randy Kroszner, Mark Mitchell, Andrew Samwick, Bill Schwert, Scott Stern, Rob Vishny, Karen Wruck, Darius Palia (1999)
Understanding the Determinants of Managerial Ownership and the Link Between Ownership and PerformanceJournal of Financial Economics, 53
B. Hall, Jeffrey Liebman (1997)
Are CEOS Really Paid Like Bureaucrats?Organizations & Markets eJournal
LJ Abbott, S Parker, GF Peters (2004)
Audit committee characteristics and restatements: A study of the efficacy of certain Blue Ribbon Committee recommendationsAuditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23
A Shivdasani, M Zenner (2004)
Best practices in corporate governance: What two decades of research revealsThe Bank of American Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 16
Pradeep Chhibber, S. Majumdar (1999)
Foreign Ownership and Profitability: Property Rights, Control, and the Performance of Firms in Indian Industry*The Journal of Law and Economics, 42
IM Millstein, PW MacAvoy (1998)
The active board of directors and performance of the large publicly traded corporationColumbia Law Review, 98
Jean Be´dard, S. Chtourou, Lucie Courteau (2004)
The Effect of Audit Committee Expertise, Independence, and Activity on Aggressive Earnings ManagementEar and Hearing, 23
EF Fama (1980)
Agency problems and the theory of the firmJournal of Political Economy, 88
T Eisenberg, S Sundgren, MT Wells (1998)
Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firmsJournal of Financial Economics, 48
M Jensen (2001)
Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective functionEuropean Financial Management Journal, 7
Gregory Maassen (1999)
An International Comparison of Corporate Governance Models: a study on the formal independence and governance of one-tier and two-tier corporate boards of directors in the United States of America, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands
This study analyses the impact of corporate governance (CG) mechanisms on valuations of selected companies in Fast Moving Consumer Goods and Information Technology sectors in India. The study is carried out for the period 2002–2006 because improvement initiatives of CG were undertaken during the period. The panel data regression method is used to examine the impact of CG factors on market valuation. Data consisting of a sample of 30 companies for the entire five-year period represent the database for this study. Results obtained showed an overall strong significant relationship between CG and market value of a firm. Of all the CG mechanisms (representing CG) studied, however, only shareholders' rights, and value creation for stakeholders, emerged as important for impact on the valuation. The findings are expected to have practical implications for directors, owners and regulators to formulate the CG codes and guidelines.
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 18, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.