Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Doni, G. Ricchiuti (2011)
Market Equilibrium in the Presence of Green Consumers and Responsible Firms: A Comparative Statics AnalysisO&M: Firms & Other Social Institutions eJournal
AC Chao, JY Lee, LFS Wang, S Pauline (2016)
Corporate social responsibility, trade liberalization and global welfare”Trade liberalization: global policies, benefits and economic risks
(2001)
Green Paper: Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility
K. Fujiwara (2007)
Partial Privatization in a Differentiated Mixed OligopolyJournal of Economics, 92
C Benassi, M Castellani, M Mussoni (2016)
Price equilibrium and willingness to pay in a vertically differentiated mixed duopolyJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 125
L. Fanti, D. Buccella (2017)
The effects of corporate social responsibility on entryEconomia e Politica Industriale, 44
Juan Bárcena-Ruiz, Quan Dong, Leonard Wang (2019)
Foreign-owned firms and partial privatization of state holding corporationsThe Japanese Economic Review, 71
L. Filippini, C. Vergari (2017)
Vertical Integration Smooths Innovation DiffusionThe B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 17
L. Fanti, D. Buccella (2017)
Corporate social responsibility, profits and welfare with managerial firmsInternational Review of Economics, 64
M. Kopel, Björn Brand (2011)
Socially Responsible Firms and Endogenous Choice of Strategic IncentivesCorporate Governance: Social Responsibility & Social Impact eJournal
Charlie Chen, Qian Liu, Jiefen Li, Leonard Wang (2016)
Corporate social responsibility and downstream price competition with retailer's effortInternational Review of Economics & Finance, 46
Qian Liu, Leonard Wang, Charlie Chen (2019)
Upstream privatization in mixed markets with retailer's effortsThe North American Journal of Economics and Finance
Constantine Manasakis, Evangelos Mitrokostas, Emmanuel Petrakis (2013)
Certification of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities in Oligopolistic Markets (Certification Des Activités De Responsabilité Sociale Des Compagnies Dans Des Marchés Oligopolistiques)SRPN: Corporate Social Responsibility Issues (Topic)
Leonard Wang, Ya-Chin Wang, Lihong Zhao (2012)
Tariff Policy and Welfare in an International Duopoly with Consumer‐Friendly InitiativePublic Economics: Fiscal Policies & Behavior of Economic Agents eJournal
Gregory Goering (2008)
Socially concerned firms and the provision of durable goodsEconomic Modelling, 25
Lisa Planer-Friedrich, Marco Sahm (2019)
Strategic corporate social responsibility, imperfect competition, and market concentrationJournal of Economics, 129
Jie Li, Xingtang Wang, Baomin Dong, Eden Yu (2019)
Corporate Social Responsibility, Vertical Product Differentiation and International CompetitionMonetary Economics eJournal
B. Brand, Michael Grothe (2013)
Social responsibility in a bilateral monopolyJournal of Economics, 115
Chih-Chen Liu, Leonard Wang, Sang‐Ho Lee (2015)
Strategic environmental corporate social responsibility in a differentiated duopoly marketEconomics Letters, 129
M. Kopel (2014)
Price and Quantity Contracts in a Mixed Duopoly with a Socially Concerned …FirmERN: Other Organizations & Markets: Formal & Informal Structures (Topic)
V. Kalashnikov, V. Bulavsky, N. Kalashnykova, F. Perez (2011)
Mixed oligopoly with consistent conjecturesEur. J. Oper. Res., 210
Toshihiro Matsumura (1998)
Partial privatization in mixed duopolyJournal of Public Economics, 70
M Kopel, B Brand (2012)
Socially responsible firms and endogenous choice of strategic incentivesEconomic Modelling, 29
S. Arora, S. Gangopadhyay (1995)
Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcomplianceJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 28
(2019)
Mixed oligopoly, costreducing research and development, and privatization
M Kopel (2015)
Price and quantity contracts in a mixed duopoly with a socially concerned firmManagerial and Decision Economics, 36
Corrado Benassi, Massimiliano Castellani, Maurizio Mussoni (2015)
Price Equilibrium and Willingness to Pay in a Vertically Differentiated Mixed DuopolyERN: Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Externalities (Topic)
Toshihiro Matsumura, Akira Ogawa (2014)
Corporate Social Responsibility or Payoff Asymmetry? A Study of an Endogenous Timing GameSouthern Economic Journal, 81
Gregory Goering (2014)
The Profit‐Maximizing Case for Corporate Social Responsibility in a Bilateral MonopolyManagerial and Decision Economics, 35
L Lambertini, A Palestini, A Tampieri (2016)
CSR in an asymmetric duopoly with environmental externalitySouthern Economic Journal, 83
Aurora García-Gallego, Nikolaos Georgantzís (2009)
Market Effects of Changes in Consumers' Social ResponsibilityMicroeconomics: Production
N Doni, G Ricchiuti (2013)
Market equilibrium in the presence of green consumers and responsible firms: A comparative statics analysisResource and Energy Economics, 35
Gregory Goering (2012)
Corporate social responsibility and marketing channel coordinationResearch in Economics, 66
Gregory Goering (2007)
The strategic use of managerial incentives in a non-profit firm mixed duopolyManagerial and Decision Economics, 28
L. Fanti, D. Buccella (2017)
Corporate social responsibility in a game-theoretic contextEconomia e Politica Industriale, 44
(2018)
Optimal privatization and subsidization policy in mixed oligopoly : Relevance of an efficiency gap
G. Fraja, Flavio Delbono (1989)
ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES OF A PUBLIC ENTERPRISE IN OLIGOPOLY, 41
Constantine Manasakis, Evangelos Mitrokostas, E. Petrakis (2018)
Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility by a Multinational FirmPSN: Multi-National Corporations (MNCs) (International) (Topic)
Sang‐Ho Lee, Yoshihiro Tomaru (2017)
Output and R&D subsidies in a mixed oligopolyOper. Res. Lett., 45
Qian Liu, Leonard Wang, Charlie Chen (2018)
CSR in an oligopoly with foreign competition: Policy and welfare implicationsEconomic Modelling
Yang-Ming Chang, Hung‐Yi Chen, Leonard Wang, Shih‐Jye Wu (2014)
Corporate Social Responsibility and International Competition: A Welfare AnalysisERN: Other Organizations & Markets: Firms & Other Social Institutions (Topic)
Aleix Calveras, J. Ganuza (2018)
Corporate Social Responsibility and Product QualityEmployee Social Responsibility & HR Practices eJournal
L. Lambertini, A. Palestini, A. Tampieri (2014)
CSR in an Asymmetric Duopoly with Environmental ExternalitiesERN: Stochastic & Dynamic Games (Topic)
Seung-Leul Kim, Sang‐Ho Lee, Toshihiro Matsumura (2019)
Corporate social responsibility and privatization policy in a mixed oligopolyJournal of Economics
K. Ouattara (2017)
Strategic privatization in a mixed duopoly with a socially responsible firmEconomics Bulletin, 37
L. Nett (1993)
MIXED OLIGOPOLY WITH HOMOGENEOUS GOODSAnnals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 64
In this paper, we consider that the public firm competes with a private firm caring about consumer surplus in vertically differentiated market. We explore the privatization policy, and the relationship between the optimal degree of privatization and the CSR degree of private firm. We find that if the public firm produces low-quality products, the government should adopt a policy of privatization, and the optimal degree of privatization is decreasing (increasing) in the CSR degree of private firm, if the cost difference of quality is sufficiently small (large). However, if the public firm produces high-quality products and the cost difference of quality is sufficiently large (small), the government should (not) adopt a policy of privatization. The government's privatization policy is related to the difference in quality and cost of the products produced by firms. We further analyze the endogenous selection of product quality between public firm and private firm and find that if the quality gap between high-quality products and low-quality products is sufficiently large, both firms will choose to produce high-quality products. If the product quality gap is of medium-intensity, the public firm chooses to produce low-quality products, and the private firm chooses to produce high-quality products. However, if the product quality gap is sufficiently small, there is no Nash equilibrium.
The Japanese Economic Review – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 1, 2022
Keywords: Vertical product differentiation; Mixed oligopoly; Corporate social responsibility; Privatization policy; Cost-difference quality; L13; L33; L50; H4
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.