Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C Ayim, A Kassahun, C Addison, B Tekinerdogan (2022)
Adoption of ICT innovations in the agriculture sector in Africa: a review of the literatureAgric Food Secur, 11
H Chesbrough, C Lettl, T Ritter (2018)
Value creation and value capture in open innovationJ Prod Innov Manag, 35
C Alexandre, A Toillier, S Mignon (2022)
Exploring the nature of dynamic capabilities and enabling environments for service innovation in the Global South: the case of digital agro-advisory services in Burkina FasoJ Innov Econ Manag, 39
G Carletto, M Ruel, P Winters, A Zezza (2015)
Farm-level pathways to improved nutritional status: introduction to the special issueJ Dev Stud, 51
K Saito, S Diack, I Dieng, MK N’Diaye (2015)
On-farm testing of a nutrient management decision-support tool for rice in the Senegal River valleyComput Electron Agric, 116
J Sarron, D Beillouin, J Huat, JM Koffi, J Diatta, É Malézieux, E Faye (2022)
Digital agriculture to fulfil the shortage of horticultural data and achieve food security in sub-Saharan AfricaActa Horticulturae, 1348
ET Berthet, GM Hickey, L Klerkx (2018)
Opening design and innovation processes in agriculture: Insights from design and management sciences and future directionsAgric Syst, 165
JC Aker, I Ghosh, J Burrell (2016)
The promise (and pitfalls) of ICT for agriculture initiativesAgric Econ, 47
A Rouyre, A-S Fernandez (2019)
Managing knowledge sharing-protecting tensions in coupled innovation projects among several competitorsCalif Manage Rev, 62
L Klerkx, E Jakku, P Labarthe (2019)
A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: new contributions and a future research agendaNJAS - Wageningen J Life Sci, 90–91
M Lacoste, S Cook, M McNee (2022)
On-farm experimentation to transform global agricultureNat Food, 3
G Blundo-Canto, B Triomphe, G Faure, D Barret, HE de RomemontA (2019)
Building a culture of impact in an international agricultural research organization: process and reflective learningRes Eval, 28
J Sumberg, J Heirman, C Raboanarielina, A Kaboré (2013)
From agricultural research to ?product development? what role for user feedback and feedback loops?Outlook on Agriculture, 42
M McCampbell, C Schumann, L Klerkx (2021)
Good intentions in complex realities: challenges for designing responsibly in digital agriculture in low-income countriesSociol Rural
C Abras, D Maloney-Krichmar, J Preece, W In Bainbridge (2004)
User-centered designEncyclopedia of human-computer interaction
B Ezeomah, R Duncombe (2019)
The role of digital platforms in disrupting agricultural value chains in developing countriesIFIP Adv Inf Commun Technol, 551
S Ollila, M Elmquist (2011)
Managing open innovation: exploring challenges at the interfaces of an open innovation arenaCreat Innov Manag, 20
H Kool, JA Andersson, KE Giller (2020)
Reproducibility and external validity of on-farm experimental research in AfricaExp Agric, 56
ED Lioutas, C Charatsari, G La Rocca, M De Rosa (2019)
Key questions on the use of big data in farming: an activity theory approachNJAS - Wagening J Life Sci, 90–91
M Richardson, R Coe, K Descheemaeker (2021)
Farmer research networks in principle and practiceInt J Agric Sustain, 0
NT Anderson, KB Walsh, D Wulfsohn (2021)
Technologies for forecasting tree fruit load and harvest timing?from ground, sky and timeAgronomy, 11
J Mendes, TM Pinho, F Neves dos Santos, JJ Sousa, E Peres, J Boaventura-Cunh, M Cunha, R Morais (2020)
Smartphone applications targeting precision agriculture practices?a systematic reviewAgronomy, 10
SS Chaurasia, N Kaul, B Yadav, D Shukla (2020)
Open innovation for sustainability through creating shared value-role of knowledge management system, openness and organizational structureJ Knowl Manag, 24
R Fabregas, M Kremer, F Schilbach (2019)
Realizing the potential of digital development: the case of agricultural adviceScience, 366
S Cook, J Cock, T Oberthür, M Fisher (2013)
On-farm experimentationBetter Crops, 97
AM McGahan, MLAM Bogers, H Chesbrough, M Holgersson (2021)
Tackling societal challenges with open innovationCalif Manage Rev, 63
V Bellon-Maurel, C Huyghe (2017)
Putting agricultural equipment and digital technologies at the cutting edge of agroecologyOCL, 24
J Sarron, É Malézieux, CAB Sané, É Faye (2018)
Mango yield mapping at the orchard scale based on tree structure and land cover assessed by UAVRemote Sensing, 10
M Burke, D Lobell (2017)
Satellite-based assessment of yield variation and its determinants in smallholder African systemsProc Natl Acad Sci
H Baumüller (2018)
The little we know: an exploratory literature review on the utility of mobile phone-enabled services for smallholder farmersJ Int Dev, 30
E Beza, J Steinke, J Van Etten, P Reidsma, C Fadda, S Mittra, P Mathur, L Kooistra (2017)
What are the prospects for citizen science in agriculture? Evidence from three continents on motivation and mobile telephone use of resource-poor farmersPloS ONE, 12
S Cook, EL Jackson, MJ Fisher, D Baker, D Diepeveen (2021)
Embedding digital agriculture into sustainable Australian food systems: pathways and pitfalls to value creationInt J Agric Sustain, 0
L Klerkx, D Rose (2020)
Dealing with the game-changing technologies of Agriculture 4.0: how do we manage diversity and responsibility in food system transition pathways?Glob Food Sec, 24
L Wiseman, J Sanderson, A Zhang, E Jakku (2019)
Farmers and their data: an examination of farmers? reluctance to share their data through the lens of the laws impacting smart farmingNJAS - Wagening J Life Sci, 90–91
N de Roo, JA Andersson, TJ Krupnik (2019)
On-farm trials for development impact? The organisation of research and the scaling of agricultural technologiesExp Agric, 55
C Stitzlein, S Fielke, A Fleming, E Jakku, M Mooij (2020)
Participatory design of digital agriculture technologies: bridging gaps between science and practiceRural Ext Innov Syst J, 16
This study is based on the observation that many digital tools and services for agriculture do not put farmers’ expectations and interests first, resulting in top-down research and development. On-Farm Experimentation (OFE) contributes to overcoming these limitations because it places farmers at the center of innovation processes, while ensuring rich interactions with various value chain actors. The richness of OFE is in part explained by the diversity of stakeholders involved and the co-learning that results from their interactions. Studies in management and social sciences show that such open innovation processes can be difficult to manage. Aligning the visions and interests of the different stakeholders, fostering the sharing of resources and knowledge to produce value, and sharing the value created in an equitable manner remain a real challenge. Although these issues can refine the understanding of the mechanisms that condition the success of OFE, they have yet to be sufficiently analyzed. Recent publications underline the need to explore the organizational and managerial aspects of OFE to facilitate its implementation in various contexts. This work proposes to fill this gap by providing ten key lessons for conducting OFE with the aim of creating shared value, i.e., developing innovative technologies and practices that benefit all parties but, first and foremost, farmers. These ten key lessons stem from the reflexive monitoring of an OFE process aimed at developing the SoYield® decision support system for helping mango value chain actors to estimate fruit production in Africa. This reflexive monitoring was conducted by the main actors involved in this process, namely, farmers, a private firm and research centers. These key lessons lay the foundations for strengthening a community of practice on OFE implementation and for facilitating its development worldwide. This study also provides insights into the contributions and limitations of digital tools for conducting OFE.
Agronomy for Sustainable Development – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 1, 2023
Keywords: User-centered design; Value creation and capture; Open innovation; Digital agriculture; Fruit value chain; Mango
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.