Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Critical Planning and DesignPatsy Healey and Collaborative Planning (2005): Re-thinking Democracy in the ‘Reasoning in Public’ Arena

Critical Planning and Design: Patsy Healey and Collaborative Planning (2005): Re-thinking... [The interpretation of the notion of citizenship has led some authors to the conclusion of the necessity of overcoming a ‘restricted conception’ of citizenship, in order to gain a more inclusive recognition of a cosmopolitan, rather than a mere universal, recognition of rights. So, three core issues are tightly intertwined in this paper: the controversial issue of citizenship in its multiple facets: the formal that is institutional, the substantial and the denied one; the role of planning and its ethical implications; and the very idea of democracy in its dichotomy: institutional versus substantial. Patsy Healey’s work offers us a wide set of normative perspectives and intellectual stimuli, with all the challenges of their applicability and transferability, in order to nurture (a more substantial) democracy. In all the work of Healey, planning is considered a way to enhance and re-enchant democracy, due to the long history of planning’s normative interest in richly participative democratic processes. In line with Patsy’s work, this paper considers planning as a way to enhance and re-enchant democracy.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Critical Planning and DesignPatsy Healey and Collaborative Planning (2005): Re-thinking Democracy in the ‘Reasoning in Public’ Arena

Part of the The Urban Book Series Book Series
Editors: Perrone, Camilla
Lo Piccolo, Francesco
Critical Planning and Design — Jul 24, 2022
Download PDF
13 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/critical-planning-and-design-patsy-healey-and-collaborative-planning-tg0YNv3rth
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022
ISBN
978-3-030-93106-3
Pages
117 –130
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-93107-0_10
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[The interpretation of the notion of citizenship has led some authors to the conclusion of the necessity of overcoming a ‘restricted conception’ of citizenship, in order to gain a more inclusive recognition of a cosmopolitan, rather than a mere universal, recognition of rights. So, three core issues are tightly intertwined in this paper: the controversial issue of citizenship in its multiple facets: the formal that is institutional, the substantial and the denied one; the role of planning and its ethical implications; and the very idea of democracy in its dichotomy: institutional versus substantial. Patsy Healey’s work offers us a wide set of normative perspectives and intellectual stimuli, with all the challenges of their applicability and transferability, in order to nurture (a more substantial) democracy. In all the work of Healey, planning is considered a way to enhance and re-enchant democracy, due to the long history of planning’s normative interest in richly participative democratic processes. In line with Patsy’s work, this paper considers planning as a way to enhance and re-enchant democracy.]

Published: Jul 24, 2022

Keywords: Citizenship; Collaborative planning; Participation; Patsy Healey; Democracy

There are no references for this article.