Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Delay and Probability Discounting of Legal Outcomes

Delay and Probability Discounting of Legal Outcomes Legal consequences, including incarceration and contact with the criminal justice system, dramatically impact the lives of many individuals and their families. Though approximately 95% of convictions in state courts are resolved by defendants’ guilty pleas, and the majority of guilty pleas are reached via plea bargaining, there have been relatively few empirical studies assessing the impact of impulsive and risky decision-making strategies in plea-bargaining arrangements. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the degree to which the magnitude of potential legal consequences and the type of legal consequence (prison time vs. sex-offender registration and notification requirements) affect discounting of hypothetical legal consequences as a function of changes in (a) the probability of receiving the consequence or (b) the delay to receiving the consequence in a sample of 486 undergraduates. Overall, participants were more impulsive when plea bargains involved sex-offender registration and notification consequences compared to only prison time. For both prison time and sex-offender registration, participants were less impulsive when they were facing larger potential sentences (e.g., 1-year sentence vs. 25-year sentence). Additionally, participants discounted legal outcomes at different rates based on the probability of conviction, with no differences in discounting observed across consequence type (i.e., prison time and sex-offender registration) or magnitude (e.g., 1-year sentence vs. 25-year sentence). http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Behavior and Social Issues Springer Journals

Delay and Probability Discounting of Legal Outcomes

Falligant, John; Pence, Sacha
Behavior and Social Issues , Volume 28 (1) – Apr 29, 2019
Download PDF
13 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/delay-and-probability-discounting-of-legal-outcomes-tX8fCsTvyK
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright
Subject
Psychology; Clinical Psychology; Personality and Social Psychology
ISSN
1064-9506
eISSN
2376-6786
DOI
10.1007/s42822-019-00011-0
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Legal consequences, including incarceration and contact with the criminal justice system, dramatically impact the lives of many individuals and their families. Though approximately 95% of convictions in state courts are resolved by defendants’ guilty pleas, and the majority of guilty pleas are reached via plea bargaining, there have been relatively few empirical studies assessing the impact of impulsive and risky decision-making strategies in plea-bargaining arrangements. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the degree to which the magnitude of potential legal consequences and the type of legal consequence (prison time vs. sex-offender registration and notification requirements) affect discounting of hypothetical legal consequences as a function of changes in (a) the probability of receiving the consequence or (b) the delay to receiving the consequence in a sample of 486 undergraduates. Overall, participants were more impulsive when plea bargains involved sex-offender registration and notification consequences compared to only prison time. For both prison time and sex-offender registration, participants were less impulsive when they were facing larger potential sentences (e.g., 1-year sentence vs. 25-year sentence). Additionally, participants discounted legal outcomes at different rates based on the probability of conviction, with no differences in discounting observed across consequence type (i.e., prison time and sex-offender registration) or magnitude (e.g., 1-year sentence vs. 25-year sentence).

Journal

Behavior and Social Issues – Springer Journals

Published: Apr 29, 2019

References

  • Offenders have higher delay-discounting rates than non-offenders after controlling for differences in drug and alcohol abuse
    Arantes, J; Berg, ME; Lawlor, D; Grace, RC
  • Plea bargaining outside the shadow of trial
    Bibas, S
  • Temporal discounting and utility for health and money
    Chapman, GB
  • Reconsidering the relationship between cognitive psychology and plea bargaining
    Covey, RD
  • Using a self-control training procedure to increase appropriate behavior
    Dixon, MR; Hayes, LJ; Binder, LM; Manthey, S; Sigman, C; Zdanowski, DM
  • Differential effects of amount on temporal and probability discounting of gains and losses
    Estle, SJ; Green, L; Myerson, J; Holt, DD
  • Discounting of monetary and directly consumable rewards
    Estle, SJ; Green, L; Myerson, J; Holt, DD
  • Juveniles' competence to stand trial: A comparison of adolescents' and adults' capacities as trial defendants
    Grisso, Thomas; Steinberg, Laurence; Woolard, Jennifer; Cauffman, Elizabeth; Scott, Elizabeth; Graham, Sandra; Lexcen, Fran; Reppucci, N. Dickon; Schwartz, Robert
  • A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards
    Green, L; Myerson, J
  • Plea bargaining and convicting the innocent: The role of the prosecutor, the defense counsel, and the judge
    Hessick, FA; Saujani, R
  • Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting
    Johnson, MW; Bickel, WK
  • Plea bargaining recommendations by criminal defense attorneys: Evidence strength, potential sentence, and defendant preference
    Kramer, GM; Wolbransky, M; Heilbrun, K
  • Cognitive and academic functioning of juvenile detainees: Implications for correctional populations and public health
    Lansing, AE; Washburn, JJ; Abram, KM; Thomas, UC; Welty, LJ; Teplin, LA
  • Sex offender registration and notification policy increases juvenile plea bargains
    Letourneau, EJ; Armstrong, KS; Bandyopadhyay, D; Sinha, D
  • Effects of South Carolina’s sex offender registration and notification policy on deterrence of adult sex crimes
    Letourneau, EJ; Levenson, JS; Bandyopadhyay, D; Armstrong, KS; Sinha, D
  • Translational research in behavior analysis: Historical traditions and imperative for the future
    Mace, FC; Critchfield, TS
  • Impulsivity: The behavioral and neurologic science of discounting
    Madden, GJ; Johnson, PS
  • Delay and probability discounting in humans: An overview
    McKerchar, TL; Renda, CR
  • The subjective value of delayed and probabilistic outcomes: Outcome size matters for gains but not for losses
    Mitchell, SH; Wilson, VB
  • Discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards: Processes and traits
    Myerson, J; Green, L; Hanson, JS; Holt, DD; Estle, SJ
  • Area under the curve as a measure of discounting
    Myerson, J; Green, L; Warusawitharana, M
  • Delay discounting: Trait variable?
    Odum, AL
  • Prospects behind bars: Analyzing decisions under risk in a prison population
    Pachur, T; Hanoch, Y; Gummerum, M
  • Evaluating adolescent decision-making in legal contexts
    Scott, ES; Reppucci, ND; Woolard, JL
  • On several factors that control rates of discounting
    Weatherly, JN
  • Probability discounting of legal and non-legal scenarios: Discounting varies as a function of the outcome, the recipient’s race, and the discounter’s sex
    Weatherly, JN; Kehn, A
  • Gambling behind the walls: A behavior-analytic perspective
    Weatherly, JN; Montes, KS; Peters, D; Wilson, AN
  • Probability discounting of legal and non-legal outcomes
    Weatherly, JN; Wise, RA; Derenne, A
  • Risk-taking tendencies in prisoners and nonprisoners: Does gender matter?
    Wichary, S; Pachur, T; Li, M
  • The Adam Walsh Act
    Zgoba, Kristen M.; Miner, Michael; Levenson, Jill; Knight, Raymond; Letourneau, Elizabeth; Thornton, David