Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Cozzolino, Veronica Pepe, F. Morlando, L. Cimorelli, A. D’Aniello, R. Morte, D. Pianese (2017)
Exact Solution of the Dam-Break Problem for Constrictions and Obstructions in Constant Width Rectangular ChannelsJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 143
Cheng Zhang, J. Kirby, F. Shi, G. Ma, S. Grilli (2021)
A two-layer non-hydrostatic landslide model for tsunami generation on irregular bathymetry. 1. Theoretical basisOcean Modelling, 159
(2000)
Finite-Difference TVD Scheme
M. Louge, Mark Tuccio, E. Lander, P. Connors (1996)
Capacitance measurements of the volume fraction and velocity of dielectric solids near a grounded wallReview of Scientific Instruments, 67
K. Winter (2006)
The Participation Rights of Looked After Children in their Health Care: A Critical Review of the ResearchThe International Journal of Children's Rights, 14
Cheng Zhang, J. Kirby, F. Shi, G. Ma, S. Grilli (2021)
A two-layer non-hydrostatic landslide model for tsunami generation on irregular bathymetry. 2. Numerical discretization and model validationOcean Modelling, 160
C. Ancey, R. Iverson, M. Rentschler, R. Denlinger (2008)
An exact solution for ideal dam‐break floods on steep slopesWater Resources Research, 44
Q. Zou, P. Cui, Jing He, Yu Lei, Shusong Li (2019)
Regional risk assessment of debris flows in China—An HRU-based approachGeomorphology
(2014)
Debris flow rheology and movement
P. Cui, Xiao-qing Chen, Yuyi Waqng, Kai-heng Hu, Yong Li (2005)
Jiangjia Ravine debris flows in south-western China
G. Nagl, J. Hübl, R. Kaitna (2020)
Velocity profiles and basal stresses in natural debris flowsEarth Surface Processes and Landforms, 45
C Ancey (2008)
W01430Water Resour Res, 44
C Ancey (2006)
4J Non-Newton Fluid, 142
I. Frigaard, C. Nouar (2005)
On the usage of viscosity regularisation methods for visco-plastic fluid flow computationJournal of Non-newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 127
R. Iverson, D. George (2014)
A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy. I. Physical basisProceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 470
A. Leonardi, F. Wittel, M. Mendoza, Roman Vetter, H. Herrmann (2014)
Particle–Fluid–Structure Interaction for Debris Flow Impact on Flexible BarriersComputer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 31
P. Bartelt, O. Buser, K. Platzer (2006)
Fluctuation-dissipation relations for granular snow avalanchesJournal of Glaciology, 52
Dao-chuan Liu, Y. You, Jin-feng Liu, Yong Li, Guang-ze Zhang, Dong Wang (2019)
Spatial-temporal distribution of debris flow impact pressure on rigid barrierJournal of Mountain Science, 16
A. Armanini, M. Larcher, M. Odorizzi (2011)
Dynamic impact of a debris flow front against a vertical wall, 2011
J. Sánchez, F. Bouchut, E. Fernández-Nieto, A. Mangeney, G. Narbona-Reina (2020)
A two-layer shallow flow model with two axes of integration, well-balanced discretization and application to submarine avalanchesJ. Comput. Phys., 406
O. Castro-Orgaz, K. Hutter, J. Giráldez, W. Hager (2015)
Nonhydrostatic granular flow over 3‐D terrain: New Boussinesq‐type gravity waves?Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 120
P. Cui, Chao Zeng, Yu Lei (2015)
Experimental analysis on the impact force of viscous debris flowEarth Surface Processes and Landforms, 40
A. Chorin (1997)
A Numerical Method for Solving Incompressible Viscous Flow ProblemsJournal of Computational Physics, 135
C. Hirt, B. Nichols (1981)
Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundariesJournal of Computational Physics, 39
(2016)
Particle–fluid– structure interaction for debris flow impact on flexible structures. Comput-Aided Civ
Kofei Liu, C. Mei (1994)
ROLL WAVES ON A LAYER OF A MUDDY FLUID FLOWING DOWN A GENTLE SLOPE : A BINGHAM MODELPhysics of Fluids, 6
R. Kaitna, W. Dietrich, L. Hsu (2014)
Surface slopes, velocity profiles and fluid pressure in coarse-grained debris flows saturated with water and mudJournal of Fluid Mechanics, 741
Hong-Xin Chen, L. Zhang (2014)
EDDA 1.0: integrated simulation of debris flow erosion, deposition and property changesGeoscientific Model Development, 8
P. Lin, P. Liu (1998)
A numerical study of breaking waves in the surf zoneJournal of Fluid Mechanics, 359
F. Tiefenbacher, M. Kern (2004)
Experimental devices to determine snow avalanche basal friction and velocity profilesCold Regions Science and Technology, 38
O Castro-Orgaz, K Hutter, JV Giraldez (2015)
Nonhydrostatic granular flow over 3 ? D terrain: New Boussinesq ? type gravity waves?J Geophys Res-Earth, 120
J. Major, T. Pierson (1992)
Debris flow rheology: Experimental analysis of fine‐grained slurriesWater Resources Research, 28
RM Iverson, DL George (2014)
A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy. I. Physical basisP Roy Soc A-Math Phy, 470
(2001)
Mud flow-slow and fast. Geomorphological fluid mechanics
(2019)
Spatial-temporal distribution of debris flow impact pressure on rigid structure
(1970)
Mobilization of debris flows
(2020)
Velocity profiles and basal stresses
P. Lagrée, L. Staron, S. Popinet (2011)
The granular column collapse as a continuum: validity of a two-dimensional Navier–Stokes model with a μ(I)-rheologyJournal of Fluid Mechanics, 686
Jian-gang Chen, Xiao-qing Chen, Wan-yu Zhao, Y. You (2018)
Debris Flow Drainage Channel with Energy Dissipation Structures: Experimental Study and Engineering ApplicationJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
(2019)
Regional risk assessment of debris
Jin-bo Tang, Kai-heng Hu (2018)
A debris-flow impact pressure model combining material characteristics and flow dynamic parametersJournal of Mountain Science, 15
C. Mei, Kofei Liu, M. Yuhi (2001)
Mud Flow— Slow and Fast, 582
Xin Huang, Marcelo García (1998)
A Herschel–Bulkley model for mud flow down a slopeJournal of Fluid Mechanics, 374
Ruilin Fan, L. Zhang, Haojie Wang, Xuanmei Fan (2018)
Evolution of debris flow activities in Gaojiagou Ravine during 2008–2016 after the Wenchuan earthquakeEngineering Geology, 235
Kai-heng Hu, F. Wei, Yong Li (2011)
Real‐time measurement and preliminary analysis of debris‐flow impact force at Jiangjia Ravine, ChinaEarth Surface Processes and Landforms, 36
Xingyue Li, Jidong Zhao (2018)
Dam-break of mixtures consisting of non-Newtonian liquids and granular particlesPowder Technology
P. Lin, Yinna Wu, J. Bai, Q. Lin (2011)
A NUMERICAL STUDY OF DAM-BREAK FLOW AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT FROM A QUAKE LAKEJournal of Earthquake and Tsunami, 05
JB Tang, KH Hu (2018)
A debris-flow impact pressure model combining material characteristics and flow dynamic parametersJ Mt Sci-Engl, 15
J. O'brien, P. Julien, W. Fullerton (1993)
Two‐Dimensional Water Flood and Mudflow SimulationJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 119
(2016)
Particle – fluid – structure interaction for debris flow impact on flexible structures
(1997)
The physics of debris
R. Iverson (1997)
The physics of debris flowsReviews of Geophysics, 35
ko-fei Liu, Ming Huang (2006)
Numerical simulation of debris flow with application on hazard area mappingComputational Geosciences, 10
(1986)
A critical review of the research on hyperconcentrated flow in China
L Jing, CY Kwokl, YF Leung (2018)
Runout Scaling and Deposit Morphology of Rapid MudflowsJ Geophys Res-Earth, 123
L. Jing, C. Kwok, Y. Leung, Z. Zhang, L. Dai (2018)
Runout Scaling and Deposit Morphology of Rapid MudflowsJournal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 123
C. Ancey (2007)
Plasticity and geophysical flows: A reviewJournal of Non-newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 142
(1997)
Mudflow Rheology and Dynamics IAHR Monograph Series, Balkema
Cheng-Lung Chen (1988)
Generalized Viscoplastic Modeling of Debris FlowJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 114
(1997)
A perturbation solution for Binghamplastic mudflows
J. Wang, H. Ni, Y. He (2000)
FINITE-DIFFERENCE TVD SCHEME FOR COMPUTATION OF DAM-BREAK PROBLEMSJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 126
H. Vorst (1992)
Bi-CGSTAB: A Fast and Smoothly Converging Variant of Bi-CG for the Solution of Nonsymmetric Linear SystemsSIAM J. Sci. Comput., 13
Mud flows are common phenomena in mountainous areas, which can threaten human safety and cause property losses under certain extreme circumstances. Studying the dynamic characteristics of mud flows, especially in the vertical direction, is helpful for risk reduction and hazard mitigation. In this study, a 2D depth-resolved numerical model based on Herschel-Bulkley rheology was developed to study the vertical structures of unsteady mud flows with a free-surface. The numerical model was solved by the projection method, and the free surface of mud flows was captured through the VOF method. To fully validate this new model, a series of laboratory experiments involving dam break mud flows were conducted, and the mud flow heights, bottom pressures and envelopes of mud residuum were measured. The numerical model proposed in this study was first validated by the steady-state solution for uniform flows of Herschel-Bulkley fluid on an inclined plane. Additionally, the simulated and measured mud flow heights, bottom pressures at different x locations and envelopes with different bed slopes showed good agreement. Furthermore, the numerical results for a Herschel-Bulkley fluid dam break flow were used to validate the proposed model, which further revealed good agreements. After that, the scenarios in which mud flows impact on a structure were numerically studied, and the vertical profiles of the front velocity and impact pressure on the structure were analyzed and discussed. The results show that a plug layer was formed in the mud flow under unsteady and nonuniform flow conditions, and the impact pressure on the structure was dominated by the dynamic pressure. In addition, the vertical position with the maximum impact pressure acting on the structure was not at the bottom or the surface of the mud flows, and the normalized vertical position rose as the yield stress and consistency coefficient increase for Herschel-Bulkley fluids.
Journal of Mountain Science – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 1, 2022
Keywords: Mud flows; Herschel-Bulkley rheology; Depth-resolved model; Numerical simulation; Vertical profiles
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.