Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[6.1 There is an apparent freedom of the will—Our actions presuppose free decisions—Is there a natural necessity in the world?—Feldman[aut] Feldman, R.,’s rejection of a contextualist solution to the problem of free will: determinism and scepticism—Wright[aut] Wright, C., on even-handedness and factivity—Contextualism at work: Lewis’[aut] Lewis, D., infallibilist view and Williams’[aut] Williams, M., concerns. 6.2 Aristotle’s[aut] Aristotle structural account of the actualization of potentialities in contrast with Aquinas’[aut] Aquinas, St. T., totalitarianism of the “divine intellect”—Is creativity at risk?—Our making in general as necessitated. 6.3 The question of possible worlds: Lewis’ modal realism—What does it mean for a possibility to be unactualized?—The lack of a hierarchy of importance among possibilia—Idea of interdependency of choices—Does it make sense to talk about alternatives to the actual world?—Infinite variations comprise both infinite actions and infinite reactions—Inoperability of a unique source of causation—The need for the right multiplicity, which nevertheless results in an abstract possibility.]
Published: Oct 31, 2018
Keywords: Factivity; Free will; Infallibilism; Lewis; Modal realism; Scepticism
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.