Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Description of SituationsThe Correspondence Theory of Truth

Description of Situations: The Correspondence Theory of Truth [3.1 Bolzano’s[aut] Bolzano, B., understanding of the matter—Some classic views: Aquinas[aut] Aquinas, St. T.,, Kant[aut] Kant, I., and Wittgenstein[aut] Wittgenstein, L.,—Lewis[aut] Lewis, D.,’ criticism—Rapports between our cognition and the world: a question of justification—Rejection of an anthropocentric position—Varieties of intelligence. 3.2 The lack of a comprehensive perceptual apparatus or integration scheme in animals – Knowing and simple being acquainted with—Challenging the canonicity of the human intellect through an extended conception of knowledge: difference between knowledge proper and knowledge*—Sosa[aut] Sosa, E., on metaphorical knowledge attributions—The manifold correspondences and truths that a multispecies perspective entails—Notion of agreement structure: parallels with Davidson’s[aut] Davidson, D., “conceptual scheme”. 3.3 Correspondence and relativism—Kant[aut] Kant, I., on the “thing in itself”: its unknowability—Why correspondism is inconsistent: aspectual and full knowledge—Bolzano[aut] Bolzano, B., contra Kant—The shortcomings of transcendental schematism—Bolzano’s “propositions in themselves”: consequences of this view. 3.4 How a proposition in itself works—Our mental impressions include many more details than what is propositionally synthesized—The Aristotelian concepts of “substance”, “accident” and “form”: the circumstance of there existing accidents of accidents—Processes of differentiation—Phrasing and propositional instantiation—Helmholtz’s[aut] Helmholtz, H. v., “unconscious inferences”—The primacy of the world over any subjectivism. 3.5 Bolzano’s[aut] Bolzano, B., “truths in themselves” and the performativity of our judgments—Knowledge as an acknowledgement of truth: the bedrock that resists all correspondences—Tragesser[aut] Tragesser, R. S., on Bolzano and Frege[aut] Frege, G.,.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Description of SituationsThe Correspondence Theory of Truth

Download PDF
7 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/description-of-situations-the-correspondence-theory-of-truth-vSTNyC5qYp
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018
ISBN
978-3-030-00153-7
Pages
19 –26
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-00154-4_3
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[3.1 Bolzano’s[aut] Bolzano, B., understanding of the matter—Some classic views: Aquinas[aut] Aquinas, St. T.,, Kant[aut] Kant, I., and Wittgenstein[aut] Wittgenstein, L.,—Lewis[aut] Lewis, D.,’ criticism—Rapports between our cognition and the world: a question of justification—Rejection of an anthropocentric position—Varieties of intelligence. 3.2 The lack of a comprehensive perceptual apparatus or integration scheme in animals – Knowing and simple being acquainted with—Challenging the canonicity of the human intellect through an extended conception of knowledge: difference between knowledge proper and knowledge*—Sosa[aut] Sosa, E., on metaphorical knowledge attributions—The manifold correspondences and truths that a multispecies perspective entails—Notion of agreement structure: parallels with Davidson’s[aut] Davidson, D., “conceptual scheme”. 3.3 Correspondence and relativism—Kant[aut] Kant, I., on the “thing in itself”: its unknowability—Why correspondism is inconsistent: aspectual and full knowledge—Bolzano[aut] Bolzano, B., contra Kant—The shortcomings of transcendental schematism—Bolzano’s “propositions in themselves”: consequences of this view. 3.4 How a proposition in itself works—Our mental impressions include many more details than what is propositionally synthesized—The Aristotelian concepts of “substance”, “accident” and “form”: the circumstance of there existing accidents of accidents—Processes of differentiation—Phrasing and propositional instantiation—Helmholtz’s[aut] Helmholtz, H. v., “unconscious inferences”—The primacy of the world over any subjectivism. 3.5 Bolzano’s[aut] Bolzano, B., “truths in themselves” and the performativity of our judgments—Knowledge as an acknowledgement of truth: the bedrock that resists all correspondences—Tragesser[aut] Tragesser, R. S., on Bolzano and Frege[aut] Frege, G.,.]

Published: Oct 31, 2018

Keywords: Anthropocentrism; Bolzano; Correspondism; Kant; Relativism; Truth

There are no references for this article.