Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
CD Smart, B Schneider, CL Blomquist, LJ Guerra, NA Harrison, U Ahrens (1996)
Phytoplasma specific PCR primers based on sequences of 16S-23SrRNA spacer regionAppl Environ Microbiol, 62
JJ Doyle, JL Doyle (1990)
Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissueFocus, 12
DP Martin, B Murrell, M Golden, A Khoosal, B Muhire (2015)
RDP4: detection and analysis of recombination patterns in virus genomesVirus Evol, 1
AF Omar, X Foissac (2012)
Occurrence and incidence of phytoplasmas of the 16SrII-D subgroup on solanaceous and cucurbit crops in EgyptEur J Plant Pathol, 133
L Zamora, K Acosta, B Pinol, M Quinones, A Bertaccini (2014)
First report of ?Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris? (16SrI group) causing stunt of tomato in CubaNew Dis Rep, 30
N Arayamanesh, AM Al- Subhi, R Snoball, G Yan, KHM Siddique (2011)
Fairst report of bituminaria witches broom in australia caused by a 16SrII phytoplasmasPlant Dis, 956
E Choueiri, P Salar, F Jreijiri, S El-Zammar, R Massaad, H Abdul-Nour (2007)
Occurrence and distribution of Candidatus Phytoplasma trifoli associated with diseases of solanaceous crops in LebanonEur J Plant Pathol, 118
W Wei, RE Davis, IM Lee, Y Zhao (2007)
Computer simulated RFLP analysis of 16SrRNA genes: identification of ten new phytoplasma groupsInt J Syst Evol Microbiol, 57
N Galtier, M Gouy, C Gautier (1996)
SEA VIEW and PHYLO WIN: two graphic tools for sequence alignment and molecular phylogenyComput Appl Biosci, 12
DH Huson, D Bryant (2006)
Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studiesMol Biol Evol, 23
Y Zhao, W Wei, IM Lee, J Shao, X Suo, RE Davis (2009)
Construction of an interactive online phytoplasma classification tool, iPhyClassifier, and its application in analysis of the peach X-disease phytoplasma group (16SrIII)Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 59
DT White, LL Blackall, PT Scott, KB Walsh (1998)
Phylogenetic positions of phytoplasmas associated with dieback, yellow crinkle and mosaic diseases of papaya, and their proposed inclusion in ?Candidatus Phytoplasma australiense? and a new taxon?, Candidatus Phytoplasma australasiaInt J Syst Bacteriol, 48
LM Lee, RW Hammond, RE Davis, DE Gundersen (1993)
Universal amplification and analysis of pathogen 16SrDNA for classification and identification of mycoplasma like organismsPhytopathology, 83
(2004)
?Candidatus Phytoplasma?, a taxon for the wallless, non-helical prokaryotes that colonise plant phloem and insectsInt J Syst Evol Microbiol, 54
R Harling, Y Arocha, V Harju, C Tobing, E Boa, P Kelly, R Peeder (2009)
First report of 16SrII Candidatus phytoplasma aurantifolia infecting chilli and tamarillo in IndonesiaNew Dis Rep, 19
J Singh, A Rani, P Kumar, VK Baranwal, PL Saroj, A Sirohi (2012)
First report of a 16SrII-D phytoplasma ?Candidatus Phytoplasma australasia? associated with a tomato disease in IndiaNew Dis Rep, 26
APO Amaral-Mello, IP Bedendo, LEA Camargo (2006)
Sequence heterogeneity in the 16S rDNA of tomato big bud phytoplasma belonging to group 16SrIIIJ Phytopathol, 154
IM Lee, KD Bottner-Parker, Y Zhao, RE Davis, NA Harrison (2010)
Phylogenetic analysis and delineation of phytoplasmas based on secY gene sequencesInt J Syst Evol Microbiol, 60
R Hernandez-perez, JC Noa-Carrazana, R Gaspar, P Mata, N Flores-Estevez (2009)
Detection of phytoplasma on Indian Fig (Opuntia ficus-indics Mill) in Mexico central regionJ Biol Sci, 9
V Venkataravanappa, CNL Reddy, P Swarnalatha, KS Shankarappa, M Krishna Reddy (2017)
Detection and characterization of ?Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris? associated with little leaf disease of bitter gourd from India by 16SrRNA phylogenetic and RFLP (in vitro and virtual) analysisArch Biol Sci, 69
RI Davis, B Schneider, K Gibb (1997)
Detection and differentiation of phytoplasmas in AustraliaAust J Agric Res, 48
A Bertaccini, B Duduk (2009)
Phytoplasma and phytoplasma diseases: a review of recent researchPhytopathol Mediterr, 48
IM Lee, DE Gundersen-Rindal, RE Davis, IM Bartoszyk (1998)
Revised classification scheme of phytoplasmas based on RFLP analysis of 16SrRNA and ribosomal protein gene sequencesInt J Syst Bacteriol, 48
SJ Deng, C Hiruki (1991)
Amplification of 16S ribosomal-RNA genes from culturable and nonculturable mollicutesJ Microbiol Methods, 14
DE Gundersen, IM Lee (1996)
Ultrasensitive detection of phytoplasmas by nested-PCR assays using two universal primer pairsPhytopathol Mediterr, 35
H Nishigawa, K Oshima, S Kakizawa, H Jung, T Kuboyama, S Miyata, M Ugaki, S Namba (2002)
Evidence of intermolecular recombination between extra-chromosomal DNAs in phytoplasma: a trigger for the biological diversity of phytoplasmaMicrobiology, 148
S Kumar, G Stecher, K Tamura (2016)
MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasetsMol Biol Evol, 33
W Wei, IM Lee, RE Davis, X Suo, Y Zhao (2008)
Automated RFLP pattern comparison and similarity coefficient calculation for rapid delineation of new and distinct phytoplasma 16Sr subgroup lineagesInt J Syst Evol Microbiol, 58
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-017-0960-y RESEARCH ARTICLE Detection, Characterization and In-Silico Analysis of Candidatus Phytoplasma australasiae Associated with Big Bud Disease of Tomato in India 1,2 3 2 4 • • • • V. Venkataravanappa P. Swarnalatha Sujoy Saha C. N. Lakshminarayana Reddy M. Krishna Reddy Received: 27 February 2017 / Revised: 19 December 2017 / Accepted: 27 December 2017 The National Academy of Sciences, India 2018 Abstract Tomato plants showing witches broom symp- TBB-Vns showed similarity coefficient of 0.68–0.95. Since toms were collected from different states of India. The threshold similarity coefficient for classifying the phyto- presence of phytoplasma infection was confirmed by PCR plasma into new subgroup is set at 0.97, the strain under using phytoplasma-specific primer of 16S rRNA and SecY study significantly distinct from the representative strains gene. The sequence analysis of 16S rRNA and SecY gene in the subgroups of pea nut witches broom. Further, the of eight tomato big bud phytoplasmas showed maximum phylogenetic analysis of tomato big bud phytoplasmas nucleotide (nt) identity of 95–100% with Peanut WB group revealed that, they are closely clustered with peanut wit- (16SrII). Further in-silico RFLP analysis of 16S rRNA ches’-broom strains
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 12, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.