Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Raudino offers a wide array of anecdotal evidence from his fieldwork experience as a UN and EU civil servant in Angola (2005–2006), South Africa (2007–2008) and Afghanistan (2013–2016) to introduce some of the critical questions setting the systematic research developed in the book. Why official development assistance (ODA) to Africa—which since the 1960s has costed seven times the value of the Marshall Plan without producing any safe result to speak of—has never been discontinued? Why pro-poor development organizations such as the World Bank are so fiercely contested in “beneficiary” countries? Why the countries that have managed to graduate in the last 40 years—mainly in South-East Asia and the Far East—are those that received the lowest levels of ODA in their history, while implementing public policies that have often been at loggerheads with those promoted by international financial institutions?]
Published: Nov 27, 2016
Keywords: European Union; Beneficiary Country; Sustainable Economic Growth; Capital Flight; Official Development Assistance
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.