Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Editorial: Accountability—Judging the Judges

Editorial: Accountability—Judging the Judges Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1998 As all of our readers know, the practice of psy- Not everyone, of course, who edits need be an ac- chiatry has been brutally carved up and decapitated complished author. We use a record of personal pub- by the insurance industry for the past few years. One lications as a selection criterion for the Annals repercussion has been weakening of the academic fi- Editorial Board, though, even for those who are not ber of our professional fabric. For most of us, writing currently in academic positions. papers is a very difficult endeavor. The average fac- I thought it would be interesting in this last issue ulty member now has precious little time for the con- of our 10th year to offer our Editorial Board mem- templation and cogitation necessary to really polish bers the opportunity to expose themselves profes- a manuscript, much less gather and analyze the sionally to the audience, both authors and readers, needed data. Striking a balance between scientific they have been serving for the past decade. All of precision and readability can be exhausting for the the papers in this issue have been personally re- author. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Annals of Clinical Psychiatry Springer Journals

Editorial: Accountability—Judging the Judges

Rich, Charles
Annals of Clinical Psychiatry , Volume 10 (4) – Oct 13, 2004
Download PDF
1 page

Editorial: Accountability—Judging the Judges

Abstract

Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1998 As all of our readers know, the practice of psy- Not everyone, of course, who edits need be an ac- chiatry has been brutally carved up and decapitated complished author. We use a record of personal pub- by the insurance industry for the past few years. One lications as a selection criterion for the Annals repercussion has been weakening of the academic fi- Editorial Board, though, even for those who are not ber of our professional fabric....
Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/editorial-accountability-judging-the-judges-AVsHfcqWZl
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by American Academy of Clinical Psychiatrists
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Neurology; Psychiatry; Psychopharmacology
ISSN
1040-1237
eISSN
1573-3238
DOI
10.1023/A:1022385811003
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1998 As all of our readers know, the practice of psy- Not everyone, of course, who edits need be an ac- chiatry has been brutally carved up and decapitated complished author. We use a record of personal pub- by the insurance industry for the past few years. One lications as a selection criterion for the Annals repercussion has been weakening of the academic fi- Editorial Board, though, even for those who are not ber of our professional fabric. For most of us, writing currently in academic positions. papers is a very difficult endeavor. The average fac- I thought it would be interesting in this last issue ulty member now has precious little time for the con- of our 10th year to offer our Editorial Board mem- templation and cogitation necessary to really polish bers the opportunity to expose themselves profes- a manuscript, much less gather and analyze the sionally to the audience, both authors and readers, needed data. Striking a balance between scientific they have been serving for the past decade. All of precision and readability can be exhausting for the the papers in this issue have been personally re- author.

Journal

Annals of Clinical Psychiatry – Springer Journals

Published: Oct 13, 2004

There are no references for this article.