Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Angela Scribben, W. Ng, R. Burdisso (2006)
Effectiveness of a Serpentine Inlet Duct Flow Control Technique at Design and Off-Design Simulated Flight ConditionsJournal of Turbomachinery-transactions of The Asme, 128
K. Saha, Sidh Singh, V. Seshadri, S. Mukhopadhyay (2007)
Computational Analysis on Flow Through Transition s-Diffusers: Effect of Inlet ShapeJournal of Aircraft, 44
A. Plas, M. Sargeant, V. Madani, D. Crichton, E. Greitzer, T. Hynes, C. Hall (2007)
Performance of a Boundary Layer Ingesting (BLI) propulsion system
D. Tsinoglou, G. Koltsakis, D. Missirlis, K. Yakinthos (2004)
Transient modelling of flow distribution in automotive catalytic convertersApplied Mathematical Modelling, 28
B. Willis, D. Davis (1996)
Boundary layer development downstream of a bleed mass flow removal region
Jaehwan Choi, Somin Cheon, Y. Choe, W. Hong, Chongam Kim (2012)
Study on Concept Design of Supersonic Inlet and Flow Control of Bleeding under Operating ConditionJournal of The Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences, 40
Minsuk Choi, Jun-Y. Park, J. Baek (2005)
Effects of the Inlet Boundary Layer Thickness on the Flow in an Axial Compressor(II) - Loss Mechanism -Transactions of The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers B, 29
R. Menzies (2001)
Computational Investigation of Flows in Diffusing S-shaped Intakes, 41
M. Liou, T. Benson (2010)
Optimization of Bleed for Supersonic Inlet
M. Debiasi, M. Herberg, Zeng Yan, S. Dhanabalan, Mann Tsai (2008)
Control of Flow Separation in S-ducts via Flow Injection and Suction
D. Ki (1997)
An Experimental Study on the Intake Boundary Layer Diverters for Transonic AircraftJournal of The Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences, 25
B. Willis, D. Davis, W. Hingst (1995)
Flow Coefficient Behavior for Boundary Layer Bleed Holes and Slots
J. Wagner, R. Dring, H. Joslyn (1983)
Axial compressor middle stage secondary flow study
JH Wagner, RP Dring, HD Joslyn (1985)
Inlet boundary layer effects in an axial compressor rotor: part 1, 2J Eng Gas Turbines Power, 107
G. Harloff, Gregory Smith (1996)
Supersonic-inlet boundary-layer bleed flowAIAA Journal, 34
(1991)
Air intakes for high speed vehicles
R. Menzies (2002)
Investigation of S-shaped intake aerodynamics using computational fluid dynamics
B. Lee, Chongam Kim (2007)
Automated design methodology of turbulent internal flow using discrete adjoint formulationAerospace Science and Technology, 11
(1997)
The prediction of Intake/S-bend diffuser flow using various two-equation turbulence model variants including non-linear Eddy viscosity formulations
Minsuk Choi, Jun-Y. Park, J. Baek (2005)
Effects of the Inlet Boundary Layer Thickness on the Flow in an Axial Compressor (I) - Hub Corner Stall and Tip Leakage Flow -Transactions of The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers B, 29
H. Weltens, H. Bressler, F. Terres, H. Neumaier, D. Rammoser (1993)
Optimisation of Catalytic Converter Gas Flow Distribution by CFD Prediction
S. Lefantzi, D. Knight (2002)
Automated Design Optimization of a Three-Dimensional S-Shaped Subsonic DiffuserJournal of Propulsion and Power, 18
Jihyeong Lee, Jin-Soo Cho (2018)
Effect of aspect ratio of elliptical inlet shape on performance of subsonic diffusing S-ductJournal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 32
(2012)
GARTEUR AD/AG-43 application of CFD high offset intake diffusers
F. Menter (1994)
Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applicationsAIAA Journal, 32
The effects of the boundary layer suction (BLS) near the S-duct inlet on the flow distortion of the S-duct were analyzed using a commercial computational fluid dynamics tool. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of shape factors on the location and length of the BLS for the RAE M 2129 S-duct with the inlet shape AR (0.75,0). The performance of the S-duct is influenced by the boundary layer thickness for duct flow and the counter-rotating vortex position on the engine face. All of the cases upon applying BLS were confirmed as having a different boundary layer thickness and the counter-rotating vortex at the engine face was confirmed. The PS (0,0.1) case has the thinnest boundary layer and the counter-rotating vortex is the farthest from the starboard side, while the PS (0.06,0.08) case has the thickest boundary layer and the counter-rotating vortex is located near the starboard side. In conclusion, it was confirmed that BLS has a significant influence on the flow distortion for the applied position compared to the applied length. Additionally, the PS (0,0.1) case applied near duct inlet showed the least flow distortion, and the PS (0.06,0.08) case located near the cowl lip showed the largest flow distortion.
International Journal of Aeronautical & Space Sciences – Springer Journals
Published: May 24, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.