Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[This chapter is an autoethnography of a critical qualitative open-ended narrative researcher/professor navigating skepticism surrounding her motives and methodology from a research participant and a quantitative social scientist. An interviewee’s questions about why she would be interested in elders’ personal narratives of memory loss crystallize the challenges of developing rapport as an outsider in the research field. The author asserts that a “hyper-embodied” approach to personal narrative research offers opportunities to embrace shared physical and social vulnerability, pursue empathetic connection, and transform culture through storytelling. Back at her office, a conversation with a colleague crystallizes the tensions surrounding the differing goals of positivist social scientific versus critical/post-structural performance research. The author reflects on the hopes and possibilities of personal narrative research.]
Published: Nov 9, 2017
Keywords: Autoethnography; Narrative Inquiry; Qualitative Methods Class; audienceAudience; Performance Ethnography
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.