Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Chulho Jung, K. Krutilla, R. Boyd (1996)
Incentives for Advanced Pollution Abatement Technology at the Industry Level: An Evaluation of Policy AlternativesJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30
Clara Villegas-Palacio, J. Coria (2010)
On the interaction between imperfect compliance and technology adoption: taxes versus tradable emissions permitsJournal of Regulatory Economics, 38
S. Borghesi, M. Montini, A. Barreca (2016)
The European Emission Trading System and Its Followers: Comparative Analysis and Linking PerspectivesThe European Emission Trading System and Its Followers
C. Fischer, I. Parry, W. Pizer (2003)
Instrument Choice for Environmental Protection When Technological Innovation is EndogenousJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45
A. Keeler (1991)
Noncompliant firms in transferable discharge permit markets: Some extensionsJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 21
C. Marcantonini, Jordi Teixidó-Figueras, Stefano Verde, X. Labandeira (2017)
Low-carbon innovation and investment in the EU ETS
P. Downing, L. White (1986)
Innovation in pollution controlJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 13
T. Requate (2005)
Dynamic incentives by environmental policy instruments—a surveyEcological Economics, 54
W., David Montgomery (1972)
Markets in Licenses and Efficient Pollution Control Programs" Journal of Economic Theory
S. Borghesi (2014)
Water tradable permits: a review of theoretical and case studiesJournal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57
(1966)
The structuring of atmospheric pollution control systems
J. Willis, J. Dales (1969)
Pollution, Property, and PricesUniversity of Toronto Law Journal, 19
C. Perthuis, F. Convery, D. Ellerman (2010)
Pricing Carbon: The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme
E.E.C. Damme (1994)
Evolutionary game theory
Carmen Arguedas, Eva Camacho, J. Zofío (2010)
Environmental Policy Instruments: Technology Adoption Incentives with Imperfect ComplianceEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 47
David Malueg (1989)
Emission credit trading and the incentive to adopt new pollution abatement technologyJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 16
E. Baker, E. Shittu (2004)
Firm Incentives to Promote Technological Change in Pollution Control : Comment
J. Stranlund (2017)
The Economics of Enforcing Emissions MarketsReview of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11
R. Coase (1960)
The Problem of Social CostThe Journal of Law and Economics, 3
A. Marin (1991)
Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control: Comment☆Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 21
A. Malik (1990)
Markets for Pollution Control when Firms Are NoncompliantJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 18
J. Hofbauer (1988)
The theory of evolution and dynamical systemsActa Applicandae Mathematica, 18
Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations
This paper studies the evolutionary dynamics of a market regulated by an auctioned emission trading system with a price floor in which there exist three populations of firms that interact strategically: (i) non-polluting, (ii) polluting and compliant, (iii) polluting but non-compliant. Firms that adopt a non-polluting technology need no permits to operate, while firms that use a polluting technology can either buy the required permits (and be compliant) or not (being non-compliant). The latter do not buy emission permits and face the risk to be sanctioned if discovered. From the analysis of the model emerges that all three types of firms coexist at the equilibrium only under specific parameter values. More precisely, it can generically be excluded the coexistence between non-polluting firms and non-compliant polluting ones. The regulatory authority can favor the extinction of non-compliant firms by increasing their probability of being discovered and/or the sanction level. Moreover, the regulatory authority can favor the diffusion of innovation by increasing the permits price floor since polluting-compliant firms exit the market and new non-polluting firms enter the market. However, this policy instrument should be used with caution because it tends to increase also the number of non-compliant firms.
"Economia Politica" – Springer Journals
Published: Jul 19, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.