Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Empiricism and Philosophy of PhysicsInduction and Concept Formation

Empiricism and Philosophy of Physics: Induction and Concept Formation [The topic of this chapter is the induction problem. The views of Hume, Goodman, Quine and Wittgenstein are discussed, and their common stance, that inductive thinking is a natural habit among us humans, is stressed. Such natural habits make up the basis for concept formation, a point made by e.g. Wittgenstein in On Certainty. The demand for ultimate justification of induction should be rejected as a rationalistic mistake.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Empiricism and Philosophy of PhysicsInduction and Concept Formation

Part of the Synthese Library Book Series (volume 434)

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/empiricism-and-philosophy-of-physics-induction-and-concept-formation-0RwQE30JQu
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021
ISBN
978-3-030-64952-4
Pages
73 –89
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-64953-1_5
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[The topic of this chapter is the induction problem. The views of Hume, Goodman, Quine and Wittgenstein are discussed, and their common stance, that inductive thinking is a natural habit among us humans, is stressed. Such natural habits make up the basis for concept formation, a point made by e.g. Wittgenstein in On Certainty. The demand for ultimate justification of induction should be rejected as a rationalistic mistake.]

Published: Jan 14, 2021

There are no references for this article.