Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Epistemology of DecisionEvolutionary Economics and Biological Complexity

Epistemology of Decision: Evolutionary Economics and Biological Complexity [According to some theorists, economic phenomena that determine wealth are prioritized in research. This “substantial” definition is often contrasted with the “formal” definition by Lionel Robbins (1935), stating that economic science owes its unity and specificity to the fact that it studies contradictory choices. The agent has limited resources to distribute between different objectives, and he must choose to sacrifice some objectives for the benefit of others. This definition, by intrinsically linking economics to the theory of choice, has led economics, as a science, to focus on human behavior as a relationship between ends and means. In other words, economics is the science of choosing the most advantageous option among several alternatives, depending on one’s context and needs. The aim is therefore to make the most favorable long-term choice. However, in everyday life, many possibilities arise when we make an important decision; thus, the consequences of our choices are not clearly predictable or known a priori. In this complex and uncertain environment, our choices have consequences that become more or less attractive over time. Experience allows an agent to accumulate knowledge about the consequences of different choices and to develop preferences for some. If an agent understands the consequences associated with each choice, uncertainty decreases, and decisions are driven by the agent’s preference or by risk aversion.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Epistemology of DecisionEvolutionary Economics and Biological Complexity

Part of the SpringerBriefs in Philosophy Book Series
Epistemology of Decision — Sep 11, 2012

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/epistemology-of-decision-evolutionary-economics-and-biological-b5mnTz081t
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2013
ISBN
978-94-007-5427-0
Pages
65 –94
DOI
10.1007/978-94-007-5428-7_3
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[According to some theorists, economic phenomena that determine wealth are prioritized in research. This “substantial” definition is often contrasted with the “formal” definition by Lionel Robbins (1935), stating that economic science owes its unity and specificity to the fact that it studies contradictory choices. The agent has limited resources to distribute between different objectives, and he must choose to sacrifice some objectives for the benefit of others. This definition, by intrinsically linking economics to the theory of choice, has led economics, as a science, to focus on human behavior as a relationship between ends and means. In other words, economics is the science of choosing the most advantageous option among several alternatives, depending on one’s context and needs. The aim is therefore to make the most favorable long-term choice. However, in everyday life, many possibilities arise when we make an important decision; thus, the consequences of our choices are not clearly predictable or known a priori. In this complex and uncertain environment, our choices have consequences that become more or less attractive over time. Experience allows an agent to accumulate knowledge about the consequences of different choices and to develop preferences for some. If an agent understands the consequences associated with each choice, uncertainty decreases, and decisions are driven by the agent’s preference or by risk aversion.]

Published: Sep 11, 2012

Keywords: Natural Selection; Mechanistic Explanation; Propositional Attitude; Complex Adaptive System; Propositional Knowledge

There are no references for this article.