Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[The rational choice theory (TRC), in its standard interpretation, is not presented as a causal theory, but as a formal-normative theory. Experimental economics, replacing the standard assumptions regarding the interpretation of the TRC’s more realistic assumptions - for example, a utility function that includes social preferences - has allowed us to improve the prediction. However, experimental economics has failed to overcome another theoretical difficulty that affects the TRC, the absence of a formal causal link to the entities hypothesized. In the end we are before the same problem Chomskyan linguistics faced. Chomsky, in fact, proposed a formal model of explanation of linguistic competency assuming a division into elements (e.g., verbal or nominal groups) and operations (the rules of formation and transformation of sentences).]
Published: Sep 11, 2012
Keywords: Rational Choice Theory; Pesendorfer; Mirror Neurons; Ultimatum Game; Colin Camerer
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.