Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Grossman, E. Helpman (2001)
Integration vs. Outsourcing in Industry EquilibriumIO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets
D Hedge, D Hicks (2008)
The maturation of global corporate R&D: evidence from the activity of US foreign subsidiariesRes Policy, 37
M Ganco (2013)
Cutting the Gordian knot: the effect of knowledge complexity on employee mobility and entrepreneurshipStrateg Manag J, 334
Qin Yang, Crystal Jiang (2007)
Location advantages and subsidiaries’ R&D activities in emerging economies: Exploring the effect of employee mobilityAsia Pacific Journal of Management, 24
Pol Antràs, E. Helpman (2003)
Global SourcingJournal of Political Economy, 112
Pamela Smith (1999)
Are Weak Patent Rights a Barrier to U.S. ExportsJournal of International Economics, 48
W. Leininger (1993)
More efficient rent-seeking — A Münchhausen solutionPublic Choice, 75
Direct Investment Abroad, all majority-owned foreign affiliates
Hao Jia, S. Skaperdas, Samarth Vaidya (2013)
Contest functions : theoretical foundations and issues in estimationInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 31
E. Lai, Raymond Riezman, Ping Wang (2005)
Outsourcing of innovationEconomic Theory, 38
M. Taylor (1993)
TRIPS, Trade, and Technology TransferCanadian Journal of Economics, 26
P. Moncada-Paternò-Castello, M. Vivarelli, P. Voigt (2011)
Drivers and Impacts in the Globalization of Corporate R&D: An Introduction Based on the European ExperienceSRPN: Globalization (Sustainability) (Topic)
Nannan Lundin, S. Serger (2007)
Globalization of R&D and China – Empirical Observations and Policy Implications
K. Baik (1994)
Effort Levels in Contests with Two Asymmetric PlayersSouthern Economic Journal, 61
Claude d'Aspremont-Lynden, A. Jacquemin (1988)
Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with SpilloversThe American Economic Review, 78
M. Demirbag, K. Glaister (2010)
Factors Determining Offshore Location Choice for R&D Projects: A Comparative Study of Developed and Emerging RegionsMicroeconomics: Production
A. Glass, Xiaodong Wu (2007)
Intellectual property rights and quality improvementJournal of Development Economics, 82
Karolina Ekholm, K. Hakkala (2003)
Location of R&D and High-Tech Production by Vertically Integrated MultinationalsCorporate Finance: Governance
A. Gambardella, Martin Ganco, Florence Honoré (2015)
Using What You Know: Patented Knowledge in Incumbent Firms and Employee EntrepreneurshipOrgan. Sci., 26
E. Helpman (1992)
Innovation, Imitation, and Intellectual Property RightsNBER Working Paper Series
K Ekholm, K Hakkala (2007)
Location of R&D and high-tech production by vertically integrated multinationalsEcon J, 117
L. Colombo, H. Dawid, M. Piva, M. Vivarelli (2017)
Does easy start-up formation hamper incumbents’ R&D investment?Small Business Economics, 49
A. Lewin, S. Massini, C. Peeters (2009)
Why are companies offshoring innovation? The emerging global race for talentJournal of International Business Studies, 40
Marcus Keupp, Sascha Friesike, M. Zedtwitz (2012)
How do foreign firms patent in emerging economies with weak appropriability regimes? Archetypes and motivesResearch Policy, 41
Juan Alcácer, Minyuan Zhao (2012)
Local R&D Strategies and Multilocation Firms: The Role of Internal LinkagesManag. Sci., 58
Banri Ito, Ryuhei Wakasugi (2007)
What factors determine the mode of overseas R&D by multinationals? Empirical evidenceResearch Policy, 36
M. Kamien, E. Muller, I. Zang (1992)
Research Joint Ventures and R&D CartelsThe American Economic Review, 82
Martin Ganco (2013)
Cutting the Gordian knot: The effect of knowledge complexity on employee mobility and entrepreneurshipSouthern Medical Journal, 34
S Carnahan, R Agarwal, BA Campbell (2012)
Heterogeneity in turnover: the effect of relative compensation dispersion of firms on the mobility and entrepreneurship of extreme performersStrateg Manag J, 33
Yifei Sun, Debin Du, Li Huang (2010)
Foreign R&D in Developing Countries: Empirical Evidence from Shanghai, China
P. Gustafsson, P. Segerstrom (2011)
North–South Trade with Multinational Firms and Increasing Product VarietyWiley-Blackwell: International Economic Review
Subhasish Chowdhury, Roman Sheremeta (2010)
A generalized Tullock contestPublic Choice, 147
(2003)
The impact of trade on intra - industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity
M. Connolly (1998)
The Dual Nature of Trade: Measuring its Impact on Imitation and GrowthDevelopment Economics
(2001)
The NBER patent citation data file: lessons, insights and methodological tools. No. w8498
Clàudia Canals, Fuat Şener (2014)
Offshoring and intellectual property rights reformJournal of Development Economics, 108
D. Hegde, D. Hicks (2007)
The Maturation of Global Corporate R&D: Evidence from the Activity of U.S. Foreign SubsidiariesEwing Marion Kauffman Foundation Research Paper Series
Minyuan Zhao (2006)
Conducting R&D in Countries with Weak Intellectual Property Rights ProtectionManag. Sci., 52
S. Skaperdas (1996)
Contest success functionsEconomic Theory, 7
Marcus Keupp, Angela Beckenbauer, O. Gassmann (2009)
How Managers Protect Intellectual Property Rights in China Using De Facto StrategiesIO: Productivity
Spyros Arvanitis, Heinz Hollenstein (2010)
How Do Different Motives for R&D Investment in Foreign Locations Affect Domestic Firm Performance? An Analysis Based on Swiss Panel Micro DataERN: Panel Data Models (Single) (Topic)
E. Dinopoulos, P. Segerstrom (2010)
Intellectual property rights, multinational firms and economic growthJournal of Development Economics, 92
Miguel Fonseca (2009)
An experimental investigation of asymmetric contestsInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 27
M. Baye, Heidrun Hoppe (2003)
The strategic equivalence of rent-seeking, innovation, and patent-race gamesGames Econ. Behav., 44
H. Simon (1991)
The Architecture of Complexity, 106
Seth Carnahan, Rajshree Agarwal, Benjamin Campbell (2012)
Heterogeneity in turnover: The effect of relative compensation dispersion of firms on the mobility and entrepreneurship of extreme performersSouthern Medical Journal, 33
While multinational firms from developed countries have used researchers from emerging areas to assist in the adaption of an existing product, few multinational firms have carried out innovative R&D, or R&D for the creation of a new product, in these areas. Using the threat of imitation and wage differences of researchers across regions, this study proposes a partial equilibrium model to explain the lack of innovative R&D in developing countries. I build a North-South model examining a single firm’s choice of research locations. The model predicts that weak IPR-protection in developing countries does not necessarily explain the lack of Southern research. In some situations, reduced IPR-protection can even increase Southern research. Harsh competition resulting from information leaks coupled with weak IPR-protection can explain much of the lack of innovative research investment in the developing world. My model also predicts that firms with low research needs, or firms in low-tech industries, locate their R&D in the North. Firms with medium research need locate in both countries while the firms with the largest research needs, or firms in high-tech industries, locate research in just the South.
"Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade" – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 12, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.