Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. McNamar (2004)
New Technology Can Help Avoid a Second Enron
Gunjan Samtani (2002)
Extensible Markup Language (XML)
WM Sinnett (2006)
XBRL: A ?Revolution? in corporate reporting?Financial Executive, 22
Ronald Premuroso, Somnath Bhattacharya (2008)
Do early and voluntary filers of financial information in XBRL format signal superior corporate governance and operating performance?Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst., 9
Ronald Premuroso, Somnath Bhattacharya (2007)
Is There a Relationship between Firm Performance, Corporate Governance, and a Firm's Decision to Form a Technology Committee?Corporate Finance: Governance
LD Brown, ML Caylor (2006)
Corporate governance and firm valuationJournal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25
A. Savage, Joseph Callaghan (2007)
Animal Testing and Legitimization: Evidence of Social Investment and Corporate DisclosureAccounting and The Public Interest, 7
John Stantial (2007)
ROI on XBRL: Interactive Data Cuts Reporting Costs TodayJournal of accountancy, 203
J. Boritz, W. No (2007)
Auditing an XBRL Instance Document: The Case of United Technologies Corporation
F. Hodge, S. Jollineau, Laureen Maines (2004)
Does Search-Facilitating Technology Improve the Transparency of Financial Reporting?Financial Accounting
J. Boritz, W. No (2008)
Auditing XBRL-Related Documents: The Case of United Technologies Corporation
R. Pinsker, Shaomin Li (2008)
Costs and benefits of XBRL adoption: early evidenceCommun. ACM, 51
L. Brown, M. Caylor (2006)
Corporate Governance and Firm ValuationS&P Global Market Intelligence Research Paper Series
EM Heffes (2007)
Interactive data: Is the SEC's priority your priority?Financial Executive, 23
FD Hodge, JJ Kennedy, LA Maines (2004)
Does search-facilitating technology improve the transparency of financial reporting?The Accounting Review, 79
We examine a sample of voluntary eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) adopters, who are using the US Securities and Exchange Commission's Voluntary Filing Program, and compare them to pair-matched companies based on industry, size and governance score availability. We then explore internal and external characteristics of this sample to determine whether or not there are systematic differences between the voluntary filers and their control sample counterparts. We find that these early XBRL adopters are bigger, less financially leveraged and have lower corporate governance ratings than those of the control group. These variables are also effective in discriminating between companies adopting and not voluntarily adopting XBRL in the United States. Comparisons of liquidity, profitability and external risk measures provide no evidence of group differences. We conclude that larger and visible companies that are intrinsically riskier seek to improve their corporate governance appearance by cost-effectively and voluntarily adopting XBRL in US regulatory and corporate environments. Despite the results relating to these early XBRL adopters, we believe that XBRL will play a significant role in both internal and financial reporting, and that it will have a significant impact on corporations, investors, analysts, regulators and various other corporate stakeholders.
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 27, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.