Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. and H. W. Dixon Aloi (2002)
“Entry Dynamics, Capacity Utilisation and Productivity in a Dynamic Open Economy”, CESifo Working Paper No
Huw Dixon (1987)
A SIMPLE MODEL OF IMPERFECT COMPETITION WITH WALRASIAN FEATURES, 39
B. Heijdra, F. Ploeg (1996)
Keynesian Multipliers and the Cost of Public Funds under Monopolistic Competition.Public Choice
M. Devereux, Allen Head, Beverly Lapham (2000)
Government Spending and Welfare with Returns to SpecializationThe Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 102
P. Weil (1989)
Increasing Returns and Animal SpiritsThe American Economic Review, 79
N. Mankiw (1987)
Imperfect Competition and the Keynesian CrossPolitical Economy (Topic)
(2002)
Entry Dynamics, Capacity Utilisation and Productivity in a Dynamic Open Economy
Gregory Mankiw, M. Whinston, John Geanakoplos, Paul Klemperer (1986)
Free Entry and Social InefficiencyThe RAND Journal of Economics, 17
R. Startz (1989)
Monopolistic Competition as a Foundation for Keynesian Macroeconomic ModelsQuarterly Journal of Economics, 104
D. Meza, M. Perlman (1985)
Increasing returns and the foundation of unemployment theoryJournal of Post Keynesian Economics, 7
N Rankin H W Dixon (1994)
Imperfect Competition and Macroeconomics: a SurveyOxford Economic Papers, 46
J. Gaĺı (1994)
Monopolistic competition, business cycles and the composition of aggregate demandJournal of Economic Theory, 63
R. Solow (1986)
Equilibrium analysis: Monopolistic competition and the multiplier
Russell Cooper, A. John (1988)
Coordinating Coordination Failures in Keynesian ModelsQuarterly Journal of Economics, 103
K. Matsuyama (1995)
Complementarities and Cumulative Processes in Models of Monopolistic CompetitionJournal of Economic Literature, 33
Antonio Fatás (1997)
Multipliers: imperfect competition or increasing returns to scale?Economics Letters, 57
Andreas Hornstein (1993)
Monopolistic competition, increasing returns to scale, and the importance of productivity shocksJournal of Monetary Economics, 31
B. Heijdra (1998)
Fiscal policy multipliers: The role of monopolistic competition, scale economies, and intertemporal substitution in labour supplyInternational Economic Review, 39
Huw Dixon, Neil Rankin (1994)
Imperfect competition and macroeconomics: a survey
P. Sen (2002)
Welfare-improving debt policy under monopolistic competitionJournal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 27
R Solow (1986)
Monopolistic Competition and the Multiplier
Javier Coto-Martínez, Huw Dixon (2001)
Profits, Markups and Entry: Fiscal Policy in an Open EcomomyMacroeconomics eJournal
M. Weitzman (1982)
Increasing Returns and the Foundations of Unemployment TheoryThe Economic Journal, 92
K. Suzumura, Kazuharu Kiyono (1987)
Entry Barriers and Economic WelfareThe Review of Economic Studies, 54
N. Kiyotaki (1988)
Multiple Expectational Equilibria Under Monopolistic CompetitionQuarterly Journal of Economics, 103
Y. Ng (1980)
Macroeconomics with Non-Perfect CompetitionThe Economic Journal, 90
O. Blanchard, N. Kiyotaki (1987)
Monopolistic Competition and the Effects of Aggregate DemandThe American Economic Review, 77
E. Gaygısız, P. Madden (2002)
Macroeconomic coordination failure under oligemporyEconomic Theory, 20
M. Pagano (1990)
Imperfect Competition, Underemployment Equilibria and Fiscal PolicyThe Economic Journal, 100
M. Devereux, Allen Head, Beverly Lapham (1996)
Monopolistic Competition, Increasing Returns, and the Effects of Government SpendingJournal of Money, Credit and Banking, 28
J. Bénassy (1996)
Taste for variety and optimum production patterns in monopolistic competitionEconomics Letters, 52
Charles Thomas (1995)
The Role of Fiscal Policy in an Incomplete Markets FrameworkThe Review of Economic Studies, 62
Abstract In a two-sector model, where one of the sectors is monopolistically competitive and subject to increasing returns to scale but without love for variety, we analyse the effects of a balanced budget fiscal expansion. Such an expansion could increase the welfare of the representative individual, if elasticities of substitution in production and consumption are low. A reorganization of production takes place—increasing returns enabling a rise in real income.
The Japanese Economic Review – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 1, 2009
Keywords: economics, general; microeconomics; macroeconomics/monetary economics//financial economics; econometrics; development economics; economic history
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.