Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Forecasting European high-growth Firms - A Random Forest Approach

Forecasting European high-growth Firms - A Random Forest Approach High-growth firms (HGFs) have aroused considerable interest both by researchers and policymakers mainly because of their substantial contribution to job creation and to the advancement of the surrounding economy (Acs et al., Small Bus Res Summ (328):1–92 2008, Schreyer 2000). Any initiative to foster HGFs requires the ability to reliably anticipate them. There seems to be a consensus in previous mainly regression-based studies on the impossibility of such a prediction (Coad, Doc Trav Centre d’Econ Sorbonne 24:1–72 2007b). Using a novel random forest (RF) based approach and a recent data set (2004–2014) covering 179970 unique firms from nine European countries, we show the potential of a true out-of-sample prediction: depending on the country, we were able to determine up to 39% of all HGFs by selecting only ten percent of all firms. The RF algorithm is both used to determine relevant predictors and for the actual prediction and pattern analysis. Both the selection of the best RF and the cross-country comparisons are based on a Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis. We find that most accurate HGF predictions are possible in GB, France, and Italy and largely confirm this ranking using Venkatraman’s unpaired test. Apart from the firm’s size, age, and past growth, the sales per employee, the fixed assets ratio, and the debt ratio are quite important. Our “typical” HGFs determined using RF prototypes have been older and bigger than the remaining firms, which is counterintuitive and atypical in literature. Based on our finding, typical HGFs are not start-ups, which questions current political funding strategies. Apart from that, our results do not support and rather refute the existence of a survivorship bias. Moreover, approximately every fourth HGF remains to be a HGF in the next period. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png "Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade" Springer Journals

Forecasting European high-growth Firms - A Random Forest Approach

Download PDF
42 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/forecasting-european-high-growth-firms-a-random-forest-approach-n18H83GaXv

References (100)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
Subject
Economics; Industrial Organization; Political Economy/Economic Policy; R & D/Technology Policy; European Integration; Microeconomics; International Economics
ISSN
1566-1679
eISSN
1573-7012
DOI
10.1007/s10842-017-0257-0
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

High-growth firms (HGFs) have aroused considerable interest both by researchers and policymakers mainly because of their substantial contribution to job creation and to the advancement of the surrounding economy (Acs et al., Small Bus Res Summ (328):1–92 2008, Schreyer 2000). Any initiative to foster HGFs requires the ability to reliably anticipate them. There seems to be a consensus in previous mainly regression-based studies on the impossibility of such a prediction (Coad, Doc Trav Centre d’Econ Sorbonne 24:1–72 2007b). Using a novel random forest (RF) based approach and a recent data set (2004–2014) covering 179970 unique firms from nine European countries, we show the potential of a true out-of-sample prediction: depending on the country, we were able to determine up to 39% of all HGFs by selecting only ten percent of all firms. The RF algorithm is both used to determine relevant predictors and for the actual prediction and pattern analysis. Both the selection of the best RF and the cross-country comparisons are based on a Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis. We find that most accurate HGF predictions are possible in GB, France, and Italy and largely confirm this ranking using Venkatraman’s unpaired test. Apart from the firm’s size, age, and past growth, the sales per employee, the fixed assets ratio, and the debt ratio are quite important. Our “typical” HGFs determined using RF prototypes have been older and bigger than the remaining firms, which is counterintuitive and atypical in literature. Based on our finding, typical HGFs are not start-ups, which questions current political funding strategies. Apart from that, our results do not support and rather refute the existence of a survivorship bias. Moreover, approximately every fourth HGF remains to be a HGF in the next period.

Journal

"Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade" – Springer Journals

Published: Aug 10, 2017

There are no references for this article.