Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Foucault and the Modern InternationalPolitical Spirituality: Parrhesia, Truth and Factical Finitude

Foucault and the Modern International: Political Spirituality: Parrhesia, Truth and Factical... [This chapter adapts Foucault’s “analytic of finitude” to provide an analytical framework. It does so by first drawing a distinction between soteriological finitude, in which things are encountered sub specie aeternitatis, and modern factical finitude in which things are posited ad infinitum. If modern philosophy seeks to give concrete epistemic form to factical finitude, modern politics seeks to give it concrete political form via the application of positive knowledge. Encountering factical finitude’s order of things ad infinitum, modern rule becomes committed to the infinite government of finitely knowable things. The problematic of truth and rule continues, nonetheless, to contest the hegemony that positive knowledge and rule has attempted to exercise in modern times: for “the manifestation of truth is much more than making known” (Government of the Living: 77). The chapter goes on to adapt Foucault’s later preoccupation with political spirituality and the courage of truth, largely but not exclusively focused on the classical world, to an analytic of the intersection of modern truth, rule and spectacle. Given Foucault’s proscription of it, why, and how, spectacle? Because no truth teller has ever claimed that truth is transparent. As Foucault therefore also notes, truth telling requires, “ways of making truth itself appear against the background of the unknown, the hidden, the invisible and unrepresentable” (Government of the Living: 6).] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Foucault and the Modern InternationalPolitical Spirituality: Parrhesia, Truth and Factical Finitude

Part of the The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy Book Series
Editors: Bonditti, Philippe; Bigo, Didier; Gros, Frédéric
Dillon, Michael
Foucault and the Modern International — Feb 8, 2017
Download PDF
17 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/foucault-and-the-modern-international-political-spirituality-parrhesia-Ux07zB76EE
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan US
Copyright
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017. The author(s) has/have asserted their right(s) to be identified as the author(s) of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988.
ISBN
978-1-349-95098-0
Pages
79 –96
DOI
10.1057/978-1-137-56153-4_5
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[This chapter adapts Foucault’s “analytic of finitude” to provide an analytical framework. It does so by first drawing a distinction between soteriological finitude, in which things are encountered sub specie aeternitatis, and modern factical finitude in which things are posited ad infinitum. If modern philosophy seeks to give concrete epistemic form to factical finitude, modern politics seeks to give it concrete political form via the application of positive knowledge. Encountering factical finitude’s order of things ad infinitum, modern rule becomes committed to the infinite government of finitely knowable things. The problematic of truth and rule continues, nonetheless, to contest the hegemony that positive knowledge and rule has attempted to exercise in modern times: for “the manifestation of truth is much more than making known” (Government of the Living: 77). The chapter goes on to adapt Foucault’s later preoccupation with political spirituality and the courage of truth, largely but not exclusively focused on the classical world, to an analytic of the intersection of modern truth, rule and spectacle. Given Foucault’s proscription of it, why, and how, spectacle? Because no truth teller has ever claimed that truth is transparent. As Foucault therefore also notes, truth telling requires, “ways of making truth itself appear against the background of the unknown, the hidden, the invisible and unrepresentable” (Government of the Living: 6).]

Published: Feb 8, 2017

Keywords: Political Economy; Modern Time; Truth Teller; Modern Politics; Modern Subject

There are no references for this article.