Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Buchberger S Grayman W M (2008)
Proceedings of the 10th Annual Water Distribution Systems Analysis Conference WDSA2008Proceedings of the 10th Annual Water Distribution Systems Analysis Conference WDSA2008
N. Khanal, S. Buchberger, S. McKenna (2006)
Distribution System Contamination Events: Exposure, Influence, and SensitivityJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 132
citation_title=Security vulnerability self-assessment guide for small drinking water systems serving populations between (2002)
Security vulnerability self-assessment guide for small drinking water systems serving populations between 3300 and 10000
M. Propato, J. Uber (2004)
Vulnerability of water distribution systems to pathogen intrusion: how effective is a disinfectant residual?Environmental science & technology, 38 13
M. Karim, M. Abbaszadegan, M. LeChevallier (2000)
Pathogen intrusion into potable water distribution system, 100
(2008)
Investigation on a pollution accident of drinking water network with well sources caused by improper use of pesticides
G. Craun, R. Calderon (2001)
Waterborne disease Outbreaks Caused by Distribution System DeficienciesJournal ‐ American Water Works Association, 93
Manuel Rodríguez, J. Sérodes (2001)
Spatial and temporal evolution of trihalomethanes in three water distribution systems.Water research, 35 6
E. Bristow, K. Brumbelow (2005)
Delay between Sensing and Response in Water Contamination EventsJournal of Infrastructure Systems, 12
S. Turgeon, Manuel Rodríguez, M. Thériault, P. Levallois (2004)
Perception of drinking water in the Quebec City region (Canada): the influence of water quality and consumer location in the distribution system.Journal of environmental management, 70 4
K. Martel (2001)
Pathogen Intrusion into Distribution System
W. Grayman, S. Buchberger, W. Samuels (2009)
Hydraulic Models of Buildings for Use in Contamination Studies
Andria Jones, C. Dewey, K. Dore, S. Majowicz, S. McEwen, D. Waltner-Toews, S. Henson, Eric Mathews (2007)
A qualitative exploration of the public perception of municipal drinking waterWater Policy, 9
K. Nilsson, S. Buchberger, R. Clark (2005)
Simulating Exposures to Deliberate Intrusions Into Water Distribution SystemsJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 131
N. Grigg (2003)
Water Infrastructure Security: Performance Metrics
M. Doria, N. Pidgeon, P. Hunter (2009)
Perceptions of drinking water quality and risk and its effect on behaviour: a cross-national study.The Science of the total environment, 407 21
Environmental Protection Agency. Maximum contaminant level thresholds for drinking water. March (2009)
//www.epa.gov/safewater/contaminants/index.html#1
(2007)
Case study on bacillary dysentery caused by contamination of drinking water
Grigg N S. Water infrastructure security (2000)
performance metrics. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Pipeline Engineering and Construction. BaltimoreProceedings of International Conference on Pipeline Engineering and Construction
Casman E Thompson S L (2007)
Implications for public water utilities. In: Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress. TampaProceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress
B. Ezell, J. Farr, I. Wiese (2000)
Infrastructure Risk Analysis of Municipal Water Distribution SystemJournal of Infrastructure Systems, 6
Li Liu, S. Ranjithan, G. Mahinthakumar (2011)
Contamination Source Identification in Water Distribution Systems Using an Adaptive Dynamic Optimization ProcedureJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 137
Stacia Thompson, Elizabeth Casman, P. Fischbeck, M. Small, J. Vanbriesen (2007)
Vulnerability Assessment of a Drinking Water Distribution System: Implications for Public Water Utilities
R. Murray, J. Uber, R. Janke (2006)
Model for Estimating Acute Health Impacts from Consumption of Contaminated Drinking WaterJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 132
Abstract In this paper, it proposed an index system for hazard and vulnerability evaluations of water distribution networks, based on the simulation of contamination events caused by pollutant injections at different junctions. It attempted to answer the following two questions in the case of contamination events: 1) Which are the most hazardous junctions? 2) Which are the most vulnerable junctions? With EPANET toolkit, it simulated the propagation of the contaminant, and calculated the peak concentration of the contaminant and mass delivered at different nodes. According to types of consumers, different weights were assigned to the consumer nodes for assessing the influence of the contaminant on the consumers. Using the method proposed herein, both the hazard index and vulnerability index were calculated for each node in the pipe network. The presented method was therefore applied to the water network of the city of Zhenjiang, which contains two water plants, two booster pump stations with storage tanks. In conclusion, the response time, the relationships between the peak concentration of contaminant and the total absorption are the most important factors in hazard and vulnerability evaluation of the water distribution network.
"Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering" – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 1, 2012
Keywords: Environment, general
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.