Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Carraro (2016)
A Bottom-Up, Non-Cooperative Approach to Climate Change Control: Assessment and Comparison of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs)Environmental Economics eJournal
N. Pidgeon (2012)
Public understanding of, and attitudes to, climate change: UK and international perspectives and policyClimate Policy, 12
Melissa Dell, Benjamin Jones, B. Olken (2013)
What Do We Learn from the Weather? The New Climate-Economy LiteratureERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Agriculture
C. Goose, Bob SavannahUSFWS (2004)
Glossary of TermsMachine Learning, 30
D. Motta, Ronaldo Seroa, Jørgen Villy, Jacob Ipsen, Anne Olhoff, M. Brix (2012)
The Emissions Gap Report 2012
M. Balakrishnan, Maya Haridasan, Prakash Linga, Hongzhou Liu, Venugopalan Ramasubramanian, Sean Rhea, Manpreet Singh, Vidhyashankar Venkatraman, V. Vishnumurthy, K. Walsh, Bernard Wong, Ming Zhong (2005)
Workshop ReportThe New Zealand dental journal, 75 340
A. Hof, M. Elzen, Annemiek Admiraal, Mark Roelfsema, D. Gernaat, D. Vuuren (2017)
Global and regional abatement costs of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and of enhanced action to levels well below 2 °C and 1.5 °CEnvironmental Science & Policy, 71
S. Fujimori, I. Kubota, Hancheng Dai, Kiyoshi Takahashi, T. Hasegawa, Jing-Yu Liu, Y. Hijioka, T. Masui, Maho Takimi (2016)
Will international emissions trading help achieve the objectives of the Paris Agreement?Environmental Research Letters, 11
J. Weyant, E. Kriegler (2014)
Preface and introduction to EMF 27Climatic Change, 123
As contained in the report of the Conference of the Parties on its twenty-first session
European Council Conclusions. EUCO 169/14, 23 and 24 October
Anthony Leiserowitz (2007)
International Public Opinion, Perception, and Understanding of Global Climate Change
Kimberly Petoussi (2016)
European Union treaties : Treaty on European Union, Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Joseph Aldy, W. Pizer, W. Pizer, M. Tavoni, M. Tavoni, M. Tavoni, L. Reis, L. Reis, Keigo Akimoto, G. Blanford, C. Carraro, C. Carraro, C. Carraro, L. Clarke, J. Edmonds, G. Iyer, H. Mcjeon, R. Richels, S. Rose, F. Sano (2016)
Economic tools to promote transparency and comparability in the Paris AgreementNature Climate Change, 6
C. Field, V. Barros, T. Stocker, Q. Dahe, D. Dokken, K. Ebi, M. Mastrandrea, K. Mach, G. Plattner, S. Allen, M. Tignor, P. Midgley (2012)
Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
J. Greene, Valerie Caracelli, W. Graham (1989)
Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation DesignsEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11
I. Lorenzoni, A. Leiserowitz, M. Doria, W. Poortinga, N. Pidgeon (2006)
Cross‐National Comparisons of Image Associations with “Global Warming” and “Climate Change” Among Laypeople in the United States of America and Great BritainJournal of Risk Research, 9
Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of the EU and its Member States. Submission by Latvia and the European Commission on behalf of the European Union and its Member States
D. Revel (2015)
World Energy Outlook Special Report 2015: Energy and Climate Change
Roy Bennett (1957)
From the Bottom UpAAPG Bulletin, 41
D. McCollum, Y. Nagai, K. Riahi, G. Marangoni, K. Calvin, R. Pietzcker, J. Vliet, B. Zwaan (2013)
LIMITS Special Issue on Durban Platform scenarios Energy investments under climate policy: a comparison of global models
A. Bostrom, M. Morgan, Baruch Fischhoff, D. Read (1994)
What Do People Know About Global Climate Change? 1. Mental ModelsRisk Analysis, 14
Johannes Gütschow, M. Jeffery, M. Schaeffer, B. Hare (2018)
Extending Near‐Term Emissions Scenarios to Assess Warming Implications of Paris Agreement NDCsEarth's Future, 6
N. Höhne, T. Kuramochi, C. Warnecke, F. Röser, Hanna Fekete, M. Hagemann, T. Day, R. Tewari, M. Kurdziel, S. Sterl, Sofia Gonzales (2017)
The Paris Agreement: resolving the inconsistency between global goals and national contributionsClimate Policy, 17
Keigo Akimoto, F. Sano, B. Tehrani (2017)
The analyses on the economic costs for achieving the nationally determined contributions and the expected global emission pathwaysEvolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 14
The European Green Deal, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. COM (2019) 640 final
C Carraro (2016)
A bottom-up. Non-cooperative approach to climate change control: assessment and comparison of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs)Journal of Sustainable Development, 9
Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDCs)
J Wolf, SC Moser (2011)
Individual understandings, perceptions, and engagement with climate change: Insights from in-depth studies across the worldClimate Change, 2
(2006)
30-country poll finds worldwide consensus that climate change is a serious problem
J. Wolf, S. Moser (2011)
Individual understandings, perceptions, and engagement with climate change: insights from in‐depth studies across the worldWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2
T. Spencer, Roberta Pierfederici, H. Waisman, M. Colombier, C. Bertram, E. Kriegler, Gunnar Luderer, Florian Humpenöder, A. Popp, O. Edenhofer, M. Elzen, D. Vuuren, H. Soest, M. Kainuma, T. Masui, K. Oshiro, Keigo Akimoto, B. Tehrani, F. Sano, Junichiro Oda, A. Köberle, A. Szklo, André Lucena, J. Portugal-Pereira, P. Rochedo, Aayushi Awasthy, M. Shrivastava, R. Mathur, J. Rogelj, J. Jewell, K. Riahi (2015)
Beyond the Numbers: Understanding the Transformation Induced by INDCs
J. Weyant, E. Kriegler, G. Blanford, V. Krey, J. Edmonds, K. Riahi, R. Richels, M. Tavoni (2014)
Special issue: The EMF27 Study on Global Technology and Climate Policy Strategies
MJ Dell, BF Hones, BA Olke (2014)
What Do We Learn from the Weather? The New Climate-Economy LiteratureJournal of Economic Literature, 52
Panagiotis Fragkos, N. Tasios, Leonidas Paroussos, P. Capros, Stella Tsani (2017)
Energy system impacts and policy implications of the European Intended Nationally Determined Contribution and low-carbon pathway to 2050Energy Policy, 100
Toon Vandyck, K. Keramidas, B. Saveyn, A. Kitous, Z. Vrontisi (2016)
A global stocktake of the Paris pledges: Implications for energy systems and economyGlobal Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions, 41
J. Rogelj, M. Elzen, N. Höhne, T. Fransen, Hanna Fekete, H. Winkler, R. Schaeffer, Fu Sha, K. Riahi, M. Meinshausen (2016)
Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °CNature, 534
(2015)
Energy and climate change: World energy outlook special report
W. Nordhaus (2015)
Climate Clubs: Overcoming Free-riding in International Climate Policy †The American Economic Review, 105
(2007)
Gallup’s pulse of democracy: Environment
Rhona Smith (2015)
Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
E. Kriegler, J. Weyant, G. Blanford, V. Krey, L. Clarke, J. Edmonds, A. Fawcett, Gunnar Luderer, K. Riahi, R. Richels, S. Rose, M. Tavoni, D. Vuuren (2014)
The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategiesClimatic Change, 123
CB Field, V Barros, TF Stocker, D Qin, DJ Dokken, KL Ebi, MD Mastrandrea, KJ Mach, G-K Plattner, SK Allen, M Tignor, PM Midgley (2012)
Glossary of termsManaging the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC)
E. Kriegler, M. Tavoni, T. Aboumahboub, Gunnar Luderer, K. Calvin, Gauthier Demaere, V. Krey, K. Riahi, H. Rösler, M. Schaeffer, D. Vuuren (2013)
WHAT DOES THE 2 C TARGET IMPLY FOR A GLOBAL CLIMATE AGREEMENT IN 2020? THE LIMITS STUDY ON DURBAN PLATFORM SCENARIOSClimate Change Economics, 04
M. Allen, H. Coninck, O. Dube, O. Hoegh‐Guldberg, D. Jacob (2018)
Technical Summary. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways
G. Iyer, J. Edmonds, A. Fawcett, N. Hultman, Jameel Alsalam, G. Asrar, K. Calvin, L. Clarke, Jared Creason, Minji Jeong, P. Kyle, James McFarland, Anupriya Mundra, P. Patel, Wenjing Shi, H. Mcjeon (2015)
The contribution of Paris to limit global warming to 2 °CEnvironmental Research Letters, 10
S. Moolgavkar (1994)
Biological models of carcinogenesis and quantitative cancer risk assessment.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 14 6
(2009)
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS
M Peeters (2019)
An EU law perspective on the Paris Agreement: Will the EU consider strengthening its mitigation effort?Climate Law, 6
D. Hone (2017)
The Paris Agreement
N. Pidgeon, C. Butler (2009)
Risk analysis and climate changeEnvironmental Politics, 18
Sujata Gupta, D. Tirpak, A. Boncheva, J. Gupta, N. Höhne, G. Konoan, C. Kolstad, J. Kruger, A. Michaelowa, J. Pershing, S. Murase, T. Saijo, A. Sari, Nicholas Burger (2007)
Policies, Instruments and Cooperative Arrangements
M. Peeters (2016)
An EU Law Perspective on the Paris Agreement: Will the EU Consider Strengthening Its Mitigation Effort?SRPN: Legal Issues (Topic)
(2020)
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 (European Climate Law)
The Paris Agreement targets and an increasingly large public opinion movement world-wide require to progressively raise the ambition of the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC). The European Union (EU) could play a crucial role in this process being one of the first Parties to submit its NDC and to call for the integration of the ratchet-up mechanism for ambition in the Paris Agreement. An enhanced EU NDC, therefore, would convey a powerful signal to the other UNFCCC Parties, reinforce the credibility of EU climate policy, and confirm the EU as a global “climate leader”. This paper examines whether and how the EU could enhance its NDC. For this purpose, it proposes some of the most likely and accredited options that could be pursued to achieve this goal. To dig deeper into this issue, the paper presents the results of a survey conducted among experts (scholars, practitioners, negotiators) and non-experts (students), using a mixed methods research design that combines qualitative and quantitative analyses to provide an ex-ante assessment of the selected policy options. The survey’s results show that increasing the EU NDC ambition is perceived as hard but feasible by both groups of interviewees. However, the non-experts’ group considers more options to be feasible showing in general a more optimistic attitude towards enhancing the EU NDC.
Economia Politica – Springer Journals
Published: Jul 1, 2022
Keywords: Paris Agreement; EU Nationally Determined Contribution; GHG emissions reduction; EU ETS; Climate ambition; F53; E61; E64; Q58; Q54
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.