Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Education is multi-functional in any society. Education ensures continuity of life; as individuals in a society get old and die off, a new generation is birthed that needs to be inculcated into the values, mores, culture and way of life of society. Education can and should also act as a change agent in a society and the curriculum should be fashioned in such a way as to constantly question given assumptions of society and institute practical ways of enforcing change. However, there are also certain unintended functions of education, among which is the promotion of some knowledge forms over others, thereby granting affirmation to a section of people above the rest. Educationists, therefore, must be critical about the constitution of textbooks, course materials and curriculum content in relation to the social constitution of the learners. How does the curriculum affirm the knowledge forms, values and ideals of a segment of the society while ignoring, de-emphasizing or even ridiculing that of another?]
Published: May 1, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.