Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Information Exchange as a Means of Collusion: The Case of the Italian Car Insurance Market

Information Exchange as a Means of Collusion: The Case of the Italian Car Insurance Market This paper employs an econometric methodology (the Panzar-Rosse H-statistic) to test the level of competition in the Italian car insurance market, where in 2000 the Antitrust Authority imposed a conspicuous fine on 39 companies for their anti-competitive behavior deriving from an ad hoc information exchange from 1994 onwards. Our set of results shows that during the years 1998–2003 the group of firms whose business in the motor segment exceeds 60% of total gross premiums has earned revenues as if it were under monopoly or collusive oligopoly conditions, and therefore appears to support the decision of the Antitrust Authority. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png "Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade" Springer Journals

Information Exchange as a Means of Collusion: The Case of the Italian Car Insurance Market

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/information-exchange-as-a-means-of-collusion-the-case-of-the-italian-an8Idca2qs

References (49)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
Subject
Economics; Industrial Organization; Economic Policy; R & D/Technology Policy; European Integration; Microeconomics; International Economics
ISSN
1566-1679
eISSN
1573-7012
DOI
10.1007/s10842-008-0047-9
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper employs an econometric methodology (the Panzar-Rosse H-statistic) to test the level of competition in the Italian car insurance market, where in 2000 the Antitrust Authority imposed a conspicuous fine on 39 companies for their anti-competitive behavior deriving from an ad hoc information exchange from 1994 onwards. Our set of results shows that during the years 1998–2003 the group of firms whose business in the motor segment exceeds 60% of total gross premiums has earned revenues as if it were under monopoly or collusive oligopoly conditions, and therefore appears to support the decision of the Antitrust Authority.

Journal

"Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade"Springer Journals

Published: Nov 5, 2008

There are no references for this article.