Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Markus Dertwinkel-Kalt, Justus Haucap, Christian Wey (2016)
Procompetitive dual pricingEuropean Journal of Law and Economics, 41
ES Sartzetakis (1997)
Raising rivals? costs strategies via emission permits marketsReview of Industrial Organization, 12
H Kim, S Sim (2015)
Price discrimination and sequential contracting in monopolistic input marketsEconomics Letters, 128
F. Herweg, Daniel Müller (2016)
Discriminatory nonlinear pricing, fixed costs, and welfare in intermediate-goods marketsInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 46
M Katz (1987)
The welfare effects of third-degree price discrimination in intermediate good marketsAmerican Economic Review, 77
Hyunchul Kim, Seung-Gyu Sim (2014)
Price Discrimination and Sequential Contracting in Monopolistic Input MarketsMicroeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information eJournal
A Arya, B Mittendorf (2010)
Input price discrimination when buyers operate in multiple marketsJournal of Industrial Economics, 58
R Inderst, T Valletti (2009)
Price discrimination in input marketsRAND Journal of Economics, 40
Anil Arya, B. Mittendorf (2010)
Input Price Discrimination When Buyers Operate in Multiple MarketsWiley-Blackwell: Journal of Industrial Economics
Narumon Saardchom (2014)
Design Patent War: Apple versus SamsungSouth Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 3
Chin-Sheng Chen (2017)
Price Discrimination in Input Markets and Quality DifferentiationReview of Industrial Organization, 50
Duarte Brito, Markos Tselekounis, Helder Vasconcelos (2019)
Input price discrimination in the presence of downstream vertical differentiationEconomics Letters
Chin-Sheng Chen (2021)
Input Price Discrimination and Allocation EfficiencyReview of Industrial Organization, 60
U. Akgün, I. Chioveanu (2018)
Wholesale Price Discrimination: Innovation Incentives and Upstream CompetitionERN: Other Macroeconomics: Monetary & Fiscal Policies (Topic)
S. Salop, D. Scheffman (1987)
Cost-Raising StrategiesJournal of Industrial Economics, 36
FMS Morton, C Shapiro (2014)
Strategic patent acquisitionsAntitrust Law Journal, 79
R. Inderst, T. Valletti (2006)
Price Discrimination in Input MarketsIO: Regulation
F. Herweg, Daniel Müller (2012)
Price Discrimination in Input Markets: Downstream Entry and EfficiencyMarketing Science eJournal
F Herweg, D Müller (2014)
Price discrimination in input markets: Quantity discounts and private informationEconomic Journal, 124
SC Salop, DT Scheffman (1983)
Raising rivals? costsAmerican Economic Review, 73
U Akgün, I Chioveanu (2019)
Wholesale price discrimination: Innovation incentives and upstream competitionJournal of Economics & Management Strategy, 28
F Herweg, D Müller (2012)
Price discrimination in input markets: Downstream entry and efficiencyJournal of Economics & Management Strategy, 21
F. Herweg, Daniel Müller (2013)
Price Discrimination in Input Markets: Quantity Discounts and Private InformationMicroeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information eJournal
Daniel O'Brien (2002)
The Welfare Effects of Third Degree Price Discrimination in Intermediate Good Markets: The Case of Bargaining
P DeGraba (1990)
Input market price discrimination and the choice of technologyAmerican Economic Review, 80
Kuo‐Feng Kao, Cheng‐Hau Peng (2012)
Production efficiency, input price discrimination, and social welfareAsia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 19
Yoshihiro Yoshida (2000)
Third-Degree Price Discrimination in Input Markets: Output and WelfareThe American Economic Review, 90
A Arya (2010)
846Journal of Industrial Economics, 58
U Akgün (2019)
510Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 28
Romain Lestage (2021)
Input price discrimination and non-controlling vertical shareholdingJournal of Regulatory Economics, 59
R. Inderst, G. Shaffer (2009)
Market power, price discrimination, and allocative efficiency in intermediate‐goods marketsThe RAND Journal of Economics, 40
Ioannis Pinopoulos (2020)
Input Price Discrimination and Upstream R&D InvestmentsReview of Industrial Organization, 57
This research analyzes the effects of input price discrimination when downstream firms have incentives for raising rivals’ costs. In the model, an input monopolist chooses unit prices for the input sold to two downstream firms via either discriminatory pricing or uniform pricing. Results show that the more efficient firm has stronger incentives than the less efficient firm to undertake cost-raising activities. Relative to uniform pricing, the more efficient firm causes a smaller amount of cost increase to the rival firm under discriminatory pricing. In contrast, discriminatory pricing may induce the less efficient firm to make a greater amount of cost increase. We find that input price discrimination could benefit both consumers and downstream firms and hence is socially desirable.
The Japanese Economic Review – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 29, 2022
Keywords: Input price discrimination; Vertically related markets; Raising rivals’ costs; Welfare; D42; L13; L43
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.